Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Philosophical Justification for the Equant in Ptolemy’s Almagest

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Phronesis

In this paper I offer a close reading of Ptolemy’s philosophical defense of the equant in Almagest 9.2. I identify the challenge to the equant that his defense is supposed to meet, characterizing it as a dispute concerning the origin and authority of the astronomer’s first principles (ἀρχαί). I argue that the equant could be taken to violate a principle fundamental to the Almagest’s astronomical project, namely, that the heavenly bodies move only in uniform circular motions. I show that Ptolemy is not unaware of this potential objection, and explore two ways in which he seeks to fend it off.

Affiliations: 1: Department of the Classics, Harvard University 204 Boylston Hall, Harvard Yard, Cambridge ma 02138USA zainaldin@g.harvard.edu

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685284-12341335
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Bernard A. 2010"‘The Significance of Ptolemy’s Almagest for its Early Readers’" Revue de SynthèseVol 131 495 521 [Crossref]
2. Boll F. 1894 Studien über Claudius Ptolemäus: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie und Astrologie Leipzig
3. Bowen A. C. 1994 review of L. C. Taub"Ptolemy’s Universe: The Natural Philosophical and Ethical Foundations of Ptolemy’s Astronomy" Chicago 1993 IsisVol 85 140 141
4. Bowen A. C. 2001"‘La scienza del cielo nel periodo ptolemaico’" Petruccioli S. Storia della scienza.Vol Vol 1: La scienza greco-romana Rome 806 839
5. Bowen A. C. 2002"‘Simplicius and the Early History of Greek Planetary Theory’" Perspectives on ScienceVol 10 155 167 [Crossref]
6. Bowen A. C. 2007"‘The Demarcation of Physical Theory and Astronomy by Geminus and Ptolemy’" Perspectives on ScienceVol 15 327 358 [Crossref]
7. Bowen A. C. 2013 Simplicius on the Planets and Their Motions: In Defense of a Heresy Leiden
8. Duhem P. 1908 ΣΩΖΕΙΝ ΤΑ ΦΑΙΝΟΜΕΝΑ: Essai sur la notion de théorie physique de Platon à Galilée Paris
9. Duke D. W. 2005a"‘Comment on the Origin of the Equant Papers by Evans, Swerdlow, and Jones’" Journal for the History of AstronomyVol 36 1 6 [Crossref]
10. Duke D. W. 2005b"‘The Equant in India: The Mathematical Basis of Ancient Indian Planetary Models’" Archive for History of the Exact SciencesVol 59 563 576 [Crossref]
11. Evans J. 1984"‘On the Function and the Probable Origin of Ptolemy’s Equant’" American Journal of PhysicsVol 52 1080 1089 [Crossref]
12. Feke J. 2009"‘Ptolemy in Philosophical Context: A Study of the Relationships Between Physics, Mathematics, and Theology’" University of Toronto Ph.D. diss.
13. Feke J. 2012"‘Ptolemy’s Defense of Theoretical Philosophy’" ApeironVol 45 61 90 [Crossref]
14. Feke J. 2014"‘Meta-Mathematical Rhetoric: Hero and Ptolemy Against the Philosophers’" Historia MathematicaVol 41 261 276 [Crossref]
15. Feke J., Jones A. 2011"‘Ptolemy’" Gerson L. P. The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late AntiquityVol Vol. 1 Cambridge), 197 209
16. Gamini A. M., Hamedani H. M. 2013"‘Al-Shīrāzī and the Empirical Origin of Ptolemy’s Equant in his Model of the Superior Planets’" Arabic Sciences and PhilosophyVol 23 47 67 [Crossref]
17. Goldstein B. R. 1997"‘Saving the Phenomena: The Background to Ptolemy’s Planetary Theory’" Journal for the History of AstronomyVol 28 1 12 [Crossref]
18. Heiberg J. L. 1898-1903"Claudii Ptolemaei syntaxis mathematica" Claudii Ptolemaei opera quae exstant omniaVol vol. 1 (One vol. in two.) Leipzig
19. Irwin T. 1998 Aristotle’s First Principles Oxford
20. Jones A. 2004"‘A Route to the Ancient Discovery of Non-Uniform Planetary Motion’" Journal for the History of AstronomyVol 35 375 386 [Crossref]
21. Jones R. E. 2012"‘Comments on Weiss: The Unjust Philosophers of Republic 7’" Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient PhilosophyVol 27 95 103
22. Knorr W. R. 1990"‘Plato and Eudoxus on the Planetary Motions’" Journal for the History of AstronomyVol 21 313 329 [Crossref]
23. Lloyd G. E. R. 1978"‘Saving the Appearances’" Classical QuarterlyVol 28 202 222 [Crossref]
24. Miller D. M. 2014 Representing Space in the Scientific Revolution Cambridge [Crossref]
25. Mittelstrass J. 1963 Die Rettung der Phänomene: Geschichte der Anwendung und der Missdeutung eines antiken Forschungsprinzips New York
26. Mueller I. 1992"‘Mathematical Method and Philosophical Truth’" Kraut R. The Cambridge Companion to Plato Cambridge), 170 199 [Crossref]
27. Mueller I. 2004"‘Remarks on Physics and Mathematical Astronomy and Optics in Epicurus, Sextus Empiricus, and Some Stoics’" ApeironVol 37 57 88 [Crossref]
28. Mueller I. 2006"‘Physics and Astronomy: Aristotle’s Physics II.2.193b22-194a12’" Arabic Sciences and PhilosophyVol 16 175 206 [Crossref]
29. Neugebauer O. 1965 A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy New York
30. Pedersen O., Jones A. 2011 A Survey of the Almagest, with New Annotation and New Commentary by Alexander Jones New York
31. Sabra A. I. 1999"‘Configuring the Universe: Aporetic, Problem Solving, and Kinematic Modeling as Themes of Arabic Astronomy’" Perspectives on ScienceVol 6 288 330
32. Schiefsky M. J. 2005"Hippocrates: On Ancient Medicine" Translated with Introduction and Commentary Leiden
33. Striker G 1991"review of T. Irwin, Aristotle’s First Principles (Oxford, 1988)" The Journal of PhilosophyVol 88 489 496
34. Swerdlow N. M. 2004a"‘The Empirical Foundations of Ptolemy’s Planetary Theory’" Journal for the History of AstronomyVol 35 249 271 [Crossref]
35. Swerdlow N. M. 2004b"‘Ptolemy’s Harmonics and the “Tones of the Universe” in the Canobic Inscription’" Burnett C., Hogendijk J. P., Plofker K., Yano M. Studies in the History of the Exact Sciences in Honour of David Pingree Leiden 137 180
36. Taub L. C. 1993 Ptolemy’s Universe: The Natural Philosophical and Ethical Foundations of Ptolemy’s Astronomy Chicago
37. Toomer G. J. 1984 Ptolemy’s Almagest London
38. Vlastos G. 1975 Plato’s Universe Seattle
39. Van der Waerden B. L. 1961"‘Ausgleichpunkt “Methode der Perser” und indische Planetenrechnung’" Archive for History of Exact SciencesVol 1 107 121 [Crossref]
40. Van Fraassen B. C. 1980"‘A Re-examination of Aristotle’s Philosophy of Science’" DialogueVol 19 20 45 [Crossref]
41. Wieland W. 1975"‘Aristotle’s Physics and the Problem of the Inquiry into Principles’" Barnes J., Schofield M., R. Sorabji Articles on Aristotle.Vol Vol. 1: Science London 127 140
42. Wolff M. 1988"‘Hipparchus and the Stoic Theory of Motion’" Barnes J., Mignucci M. Matter and Metaphysics Naples 473 545
43. Zhmud L. 1998"‘Plato as “Architect of Science” ’" PhronesisVol 43 211 244 [Crossref]
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685284-12341335
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685284-12341335
2017-09-01
2018-08-19

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Phronesis — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation