Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Uncommon Equivocation in Geoffrey Hill

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Religion and the Arts

Abstract This essay considers Hill’s expression “common equivocation,” which he associates with Richard Hooker. The expression comes about as a response to Christopher Ricks’s admiration of T. S. Eliot’s Four Quartets. In that late poem Ricks finds that Eliot has confidence in clichés, “in their generous common humanity.” Hill responds by asking Ricks to think about how this expression would fare within the field of Hooker’s “common equivocation.” But what is “common equivocation?” Is Hill guilty of it as a poet? Or does he practice something else? I argue that he practices “uncommon equivocation.” Hooker thought that equivocation is a consequence of original sin. Hill believes in original sin, and his poetry is about its effects. This is the root of Hill’s “difficulty.” Yet “difficulty” is not just the opposite of ease; it is also hindrance to action. Hill’s best poems are often difficult in both senses.

Affiliations: 1: The University of Virginia; The Australian Catholic University

10.1163/15685292-12341239
/content/journals/10.1163/15685292-12341239
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685292-12341239
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Allott Kenneth The Penguin Book of Contemporary Verse 1918–60 1962 Rev. ed Harmondsworth, England Penguin
2. Barth Karl Die christliche Dogmatik im Entwurf 1982 Zürich Theologischer Verlag
3. Bloom Harold Geoffrey Hill 1986 New York Chelsea House Modern Critical View Series
4. Derrida Jacques McDonald Christie V. Kamuf Peggy The Ear of the Other: Otobiography, Transference, Translation. 1985 New York Schocken Books
5. Eliot T. S. Four Quartets 1943 New York Harcourt
6. Hegel G. W. F. Baillie J. B. The Phenomenology of Mind 1967 New York Harper and Row
7. Hill Geoffrey Collected Poems 1985 Harmondsworth, England Penguin
8. Hill Geoffrey Haynes Kenneth "“Dividing Legacies.”" Collected Critical Writings of Geoffery Hill 2008 Oxford Oxford University Press
9. Hooker Richard Edelen George Of the Laws of Ecclesiastial Polity 1977 Cambridge MA Harvard University Press
10. Hopkins Gerard Manley Devlin Christopher The Sermons and Devotional Writings of Gerard Manley Hopkins 1959 London Oxford University Press
11. Husserl Edmund Steinbock Anthony J. Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic 2001 Dordrecht, The Netherlands Kluwer Academic Publishers http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0846-4
12. Levinas Emmanuel Lingis Alphonso Collected Philosophical Papers 1987 The Hague Martinus Nijhoff http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4364-3
13. Mallarmé Stéphane Bosley Keith "“Le Tombeau d’Edgar Poe.”" The Poems 1977 Harmondsworth, England Penguin
14. Ricks Christopher True Friendship: Geoffrey Hill, Anthony Hecht, and Robert Lowell Under the Sign of Eliot and Pound 2010 New Haven CT Yale University Press
15. Ricks Christopher T. S. Eliot and Prejudice 1988 London Faber and Faber
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685292-12341239
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685292-12341239
2012-01-01
2016-08-30

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation