Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Full Access Communication as a Solution to Conflict: Fundamental Similarities in Divergent Methods of Horse Training

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Communication as a Solution to Conflict: Fundamental Similarities in Divergent Methods of Horse Training

  • HTML
  • PDF
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Society & Animals

[Abstract This paper examines the ways in which two methods of horse training generally considered divergent approach the concepts of partnership and conflict in human-horse relations. It focuses on finding similarities between the methods, both of which, it is argued, demonstrate the significance of communication in improving human-horse relations. Using interview material, the paper analyzes the practices and beliefs of individuals involved in natural horsemanship. In doing so the paper shows that communication between human and horse works to promote relations between them that are free of conflict. This analysis is offered as a potential “solution” to welfare problems that exist both within competitive dressage practice and within individual human-horse relations. The paper also examines how the fundamental similarities between dressage and natural horsemanship could point to universalized theories of horse training focused on improving human-horse relations., Abstract This paper examines the ways in which two methods of horse training generally considered divergent approach the concepts of partnership and conflict in human-horse relations. It focuses on finding similarities between the methods, both of which, it is argued, demonstrate the significance of communication in improving human-horse relations. Using interview material, the paper analyzes the practices and beliefs of individuals involved in natural horsemanship. In doing so the paper shows that communication between human and horse works to promote relations between them that are free of conflict. This analysis is offered as a potential “solution” to welfare problems that exist both within competitive dressage practice and within individual human-horse relations. The paper also examines how the fundamental similarities between dressage and natural horsemanship could point to universalized theories of horse training focused on improving human-horse relations.]

Affiliations: 1: University of Sydney nikki.savvides@gmail.com

[Abstract This paper examines the ways in which two methods of horse training generally considered divergent approach the concepts of partnership and conflict in human-horse relations. It focuses on finding similarities between the methods, both of which, it is argued, demonstrate the significance of communication in improving human-horse relations. Using interview material, the paper analyzes the practices and beliefs of individuals involved in natural horsemanship. In doing so the paper shows that communication between human and horse works to promote relations between them that are free of conflict. This analysis is offered as a potential “solution” to welfare problems that exist both within competitive dressage practice and within individual human-horse relations. The paper also examines how the fundamental similarities between dressage and natural horsemanship could point to universalized theories of horse training focused on improving human-horse relations., Abstract This paper examines the ways in which two methods of horse training generally considered divergent approach the concepts of partnership and conflict in human-horse relations. It focuses on finding similarities between the methods, both of which, it is argued, demonstrate the significance of communication in improving human-horse relations. Using interview material, the paper analyzes the practices and beliefs of individuals involved in natural horsemanship. In doing so the paper shows that communication between human and horse works to promote relations between them that are free of conflict. This analysis is offered as a potential “solution” to welfare problems that exist both within competitive dressage practice and within individual human-horse relations. The paper also examines how the fundamental similarities between dressage and natural horsemanship could point to universalized theories of horse training focused on improving human-horse relations.]

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/15685306/20/1/15685306_020_01_S05_text.html;jsessionid=0sPHEW3GNqTsKxX1atUQCC3e.x-brill-live-03?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/156853012x614378&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/journals/10.1163/156853012x614378
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Birke L. "“Learning to speak horse”: The culture of “natural horsemanship”" Society & Animals 2007 Vol 15 3 217 239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853007X217177
2. Birke L. "Talking about horses: Control and freedom in the world of “natural horsemanship”" Society & Animals 2008 Vol 16 2 107 126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853008X291417
3. Birke L. , Brandt K. "Mutual corporeality: Gender and human/horse relationships" Women’s Studies International Forum 2009 Vol 32 3 189 197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2009.05.015
4. Birke L. , Hockenhull J. , Creighton E. "The horse’s tale: Narratives of caring for/about horses" Society & Animals 2010 Vol 18 4 331 337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853010X524307
5. Birke L. , Latimer J. "Natural relations: Horses, knowledge, technology" The Sociological Review 2009 Vol 57 1 1 27 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.01802.x
6. Blazer D. Natural Western riding 2001 Scottsdale, AZ Success is Easy
7. Brandt K. "A language of their own: An interactionist approach to human-horse communication" Society & Animals 2004 Vol 12 4 299 316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568530043068010
8. Burr S. "Dancing with horse whisperers: What horse(wo)men want" 2006 Poster presented at the 2nd International Equitation Science Symposium Milan, Italy
9. D’Endrödy A. Give your horse a chance: The training of horse and rider for three-day events, show-jumping and hunting 1959 London J. A. Allen
10. Devine F. Marsh D. , Stoker G. "Qualitative methods" Theory and methods in political science 2002 2nd ed. New York Palgrave 197 215
11. Game A. "Riding: Embodying the centaur" Body and Society 2001 Vol 7 4 1 12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1357034X01007004001
12. Haraway D. The companion species manifesto: Dogs and significant otherness 2003 Chicago Prickly Paradigm Press
13. Haraway D. When species meet 2008 Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press
14. Hearne V. Adam’s task: Calling animals by name 2000 Pleasantville, NY Akadine Press
15. Heuschmann G. Abelshauser R. Tug of war: Classical versus “modern” dressage: Why classical training works and how incorrect “modern” riding negatively affects horses’ health 2007 North Pomfret, VT Trafalgar Square Publishing
16. Maxwell J. A. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach 2005 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications
17. McGreevy P. D. "The advent of equitation science" The Veterinary Journal 2007 Vol 174 492 500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.09.008
18. McGreevy P. D. , McLean A. , Warren-Smith A. K. , Goodwin D. , Waran N. McGreevy P. D. , McLean A. , Warren-Smith A. K. , Goodwin D. , Waran N. "Defining the terms and processes associated with equitation" Proceedings of the 1st International Equitation Science Symposium 2005 2005 Broadford Australian Equine Behaviour Centre 10 43
19. Miller R. M. , Lamb R. The revolution in horsemanship: And what it means to mankind 2005 Guilford, CT The Lyons Press
20. Monty Roberts Join Up "Monty Roberts International Learning Center Certification Courses" 2010 Retrieved November 8, 2010, from /
21. Ödberg F. , Bouissou M.-F. "The development of equestrianism from the Baroque period to the present day and its consequences for the welfare of horses" Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement, 28 1999 26 30
22. Oliveira N. Reflections on equestrian art 1976 London J. A. Allen
23. Parelli P. Natural horse-man-ship 2003 Colorado Springs, CO Western Horseman Magazine
24. Patton P. Wolfe Cary "Language, power, and the training of horses" Zoontologies: the question of the animal 2003 Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press 83 100
25. Podhajsky A. Podhajsky E. My horses, my teachers 1997 North Pomfret, VT Trafalgar Square Publishing
26. Sandin T. "Rollkur—why not?" 2001-2005 Retrieved November 8, 2010, from
27. Strauss A. L. Qualitative analysis for social scientists 1987 Cambridge Cambridge University Press http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842
28. van Breda E. "A nonnatural head-neck position (rollkur) during training results in less acute stress in elite, trained, dressage horses" Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 2006 Vol 9 1 59 64 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0901_5
29. Wipper A. "The partnership: The horse-rider relationship in eventing" Symbolic Interaction 2000 Vol 23 1 47 70 http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.2000.23.1.47
30. Wright M. The thinking horseman 1983 Sydney Edwards Printing
31. Young P. "Evidence proves that in the right hands, hyperflexion is not abuse" 2006 Retrieved December 15, 2006, from
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853012x614378
Loading
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853012x614378
2012-01-01
2016-12-08

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation