Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Attitudes on Animal Research Predict Acceptance of Genetic Modification Technologies by University Undergraduates

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Society & Animals

Abstract Public acceptance of genetic modification (GM) technologies may be essential to their continued development, yet few studies have investigated the manner in which demographic and educational factors predict support for GM research. The current study examined attitudes toward animal research and GM in ~400 university undergraduates enrolled in introductory or upper-level psychology courses with material on animal experimentation. Results revealed that men were more accepting of animal and GM research than were women. Enrollment in upper-level psychology classes that addressed specific topics in animal research did not directly predict support for GM research, but such enrollment was associated with increased endorsement of the validity of animal research, which then contributed to acceptance of GM scenarios. The current findings highlight the impact of educational variables on support for animal research, which may then influence attitudes toward GM research.

Affiliations: 1: gabrielk@cwu.edu

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341261
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Almond B. "Commodifying animals: Ethical issues in genetic engineering of animals" Health, Risk & Society 2000 Vol 2 1 95 105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/136985700111486
2. Appleby M. C. "Tower of Babel: Variation in ethical approaches, concepts of welfare, and attitudes to genetic manipulation" Animal Welfare 1999 Vol 8 4 381 390
3. Bredahl L. "Consumers’ cognitions with regard to genetically modified foods. Results of a qualitative study in four countries" Appetite 1999 Vol 33 3 343 360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/appe.1999.0267
4. Broida J. , Tingley L. , Kimball R. , Miele J. "Personality differences between pro- and anti-vivisectionists" Society & Animals 1993 Vol 1 2 129 144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853093X00037
5. Christoph I. B. , Bruhn M. , Roosen J. "Knowledge, attitudes towards and acceptability of genetic modification in Germany" Appetite 2008 Vol 51 1 58 68 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.12.001
6. Compton D. M. , Dietrich K. L. , Smith J. S. , Johnson S. D. "Animal rights activism and animal welfare concerns in the academic setting: Levels of activism and the perceived importance of research with animals" Psychological Reports 1995 Vol 76 1 23 31 http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.1.23
7. Eldridge J. J. , Gluck J. P. "Gender differences in attitudes toward animal research" Ethics & Behavior 1996 Vol 6 3 239 256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb0603_5
8. Fisher M. , Small B. , Roth H. , Mallon B. , Jerebine B. "What do individuals in different science groups within a life sciences organization think about genetic modification?" Public Understanding of Science 2005 Vol 14 3 317 326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662505048594
9. Furnham A. , Heyes C. "Psychology students’ beliefs about animals and animal experimentation" Personality and Individual Differences 1993 Vol 15 1 1 10 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90036-3
10. Furnham A. , McManus C. , Scott D. "Personality, empathy and attitudes to animal welfare" Anthrozoös 2003 Vol 16 2 135 146 http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/089279303786992260
11. Gallup G. J. , Beckstead J. W. "Attitudes toward animal research" American Psychologist 1988 Vol 43 6 474 476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.6.474
12. Hagelin J. , Carlsson H. , Hau J. "An overview of surveys on how people view animal experimentation: Some factors that may influence the outcome" Public Understanding of Science 2003 Vol 12 67 81 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662503012001247
13. Hagelin J. , Hau J. , Carlsson H. K. "Undergraduate university students’ views of the use of animals in biomedical research" Academic Medicine 1999 Vol 74 10 1135 1137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199910000-00018
14. Hallman W. K. , Adelaja A. O. , Schilling B. J. Hammerschlag F. A. , Saxena P. "Public perceptions of agricultural biotechnology in the United States in 2001" ISHS Acta Horticulturae: Vol. 625 XXVI International Horticultural Congress: Biotechnology in Horticultural Crop Improvement: Achievements, Opportunities and Limitations 2003 CD-ROM: ActaHort 445 455
15. Heleski C. R. , Mertig A. G. , Zanella A. J. "Assessing attitudes toward farm animal welfare: A national survey of animal science faculty members" Journal of Animal Science 2004 Vol 82 9 2806 2814
16. Henry B. , Pulcino R. "Individual difference and study-specific characteristics influencing attitudes about the use of animals in medical research" Society & Animals 2009 Vol 17 4 305 324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/106311109X12474622855101
17. Herzog H. A. , Dorr L. B. "Electronically available surveys of attitudes toward animals" Society & Animals 2000 Vol 8 2 183 190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853000511078
18. Hutchins M. E. , Armstrong J. B. "College students’ attitudes toward animal use" College Student Journal 1994 Vol 28 258 266
19. Kendall H. A. , Lobao L. M. , Sharp J. S. "Public concern with animal well-being: Place, social structural location, and individual experience" Rural Sociology 2006 Vol 71 3 399 428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1526/003601106778070617
20. Knight A. J. "Perceptions, knowledge and ethical concerns with GM foods and the GM process" Public Understanding of Science 2009 Vol 18 2 177 188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662507079375
21. Knight S. , Nunkoosing K. , Vrij A. , Cherryman J. "Using grounded theory to examine people’s attitudes toward how animals are used" Society & Animals 2003 Vol 11 4 307 327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853003322796064
22. Knight S. , Vrij A. , Bard K. , Brandon D. "Science versus human welfare? Understanding attitudes toward animal use" Journal of Social Issues 2009 Vol 65 3 463 483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01609.x
23. Kruse C. R. "Gender, views of nature, and support for animal rights" Society & Animals 1999 Vol 7 3 179 197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853099X00077
24. Lau Y. , Cheney C. "Respondent knowledge questioned" American Psychologist 1997 Vol 52 11 1249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1249
25. Loeb J. M. , Hendee W. R. "Human vs animal rights" Journal of the American Medical Association 1989 Vol 262 19 2716 2721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1989.03430190100039
26. Macnaghten P. "Animals in their nature: A case study on public attitudes to animals, genetic modification and ‘nature’" Sociology 2004 Vol 38 3 533 551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038504043217
27. Millet K. , Lock R. "GCSE students’ attitudes towards animal use: Some implications for biology/science teachers" Journal of Biological Education 1992 Vol 26 3 204 208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1992.9655274
28. Nelson C. H. "Risk perception, behavior, and consumer response to genetically modified organisms: Toward understanding American and European public reaction" American Behavioral Scientist 2001 Vol 44 8 1371 1388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00027640121956737
29. Peek C. W. , Dunham C. C. , Dietz B. E. "Gender, relational role orientation, and affinity for animal rights" Sex Roles 1997 Vol 37 11/12 905 920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02936346
30. Pifer L. K. "Exploring the gender gap in young adults’ attitudes about animal research" Journal of Human-Animal Studies 1996 Vol 4 1 37 52
31. Plous S. "An attitude survey of animal rights activists" Psychological Science 1991 Vol 2 3 194 196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00131.x
32. Plous S. "Attitudes toward the use of animals in psychological research and education: Results from a national survey of psychologists" American Psychologist 1996a Vol 51 11 1167 1180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.11.1167
33. Plous S. "Attitudes toward the use of animals in psychological research and education: Results from a national survey of psychology majors" Psychological Science 1996b Vol 7 6 352 358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00388.x
34. Rupke N. Vivisection in historical perspective 1987 London Croom Helm
35. Shaw A. "“It just goes against the grain”: Public understandings of genetically modified (GM) food in the UK" Public Understanding of Science 2002 Vol 11 3 273 291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/11/3/305
36. Stevens J. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences 2001 Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
37. Tabachnick B. G. , Fidell L. S. Using multivariate statistics 1996 5th Ed. Boston Pearson, Allyn and Bacon
38. Taylor N. , Signal T. D. "Pet, pest, profit: Isolating differences in attitudes towards the treatment of animals" Anthrozoös 2009 Vol 22 129 135 http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175303709X434158
39. Thomas G. V. , Blackman D. "The future of animal studies in psychology" American Psychologist 1992 Vol 47 12 1679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.12.1678.b
40. Urban D. , Pfenning U. "Attitudes towards genetic engineering between change and stability: Results of a panel study" New Genetics and Society 2000 Vol 19 3 251 268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713687611
41. Uyeki E. S. , Holland L. J. "Diffusion of pro-environment attitudes" American Behavioral Scientist 2000 Vol 43 4 646 662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00027640021955478
42. Vigorito M. "An animal rights survey of undergraduate college students" Psychological Reports 1996 Vol 79 1 131 142 http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1996.79.1.131
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341261
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341261
2012-01-01
2017-06-27

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Society & Animals — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation