Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

State Legislators’ Roll-Call Votes on Farm Animal Protection Bills: The Agricultural Connection

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Society & Animals

AbstractNonhuman animal studies scholars have extensively investigated attitudes on animal welfare in general and farm animal welfare in particular. Thus far, this research has focused mainly on public opinion, but there has been minimal research seeking to explain the influences on actual policymakers when they vote on farm animal welfare legislation. This paper contributes to this literature by quantitatively analyzing 216 state legislators’ votes on two farm animal welfare bills. It hypothesizes that the representatives’ personal and representational connections with agriculture best explain their votes on these farm animal protection bills. This research also includes three control variables: each legislator’s gender, race/ethnicity, and political party. Logistic regression revealed that the legislators’ personal and representational connections with agriculture are significant, but political party is the strongest independent variable explaining state legislators’ farm animal welfare votes. An interaction model revealed mixed evidence that political party moderates the influence of agriculture.

Affiliations: 1: University of South Floridastauber@usf.edu

Loading

Full text loading...

State Legislators’ Roll-Call Votes on Farm Animal Protection Bills: The Agricultural Connection
Society & Animals 21, 6, 501 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341313
/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341313
/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341313
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Allen M. D. "Lions, tigers, and ballot initiatives: Post-materialism and animal rights" 2003 Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association Chicago, IL
2. Allen M. D. "Laying down the law: Interest group influence on state adaption of Animal Cruelty Felony Laws" Policy Studies Journal 2005 Vol 33 3 443 457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00124.x
3. Animal Law Coalition "Animal Law Coalition" 2010 Retrieved July 10, 2013 from
4. Animal Legal & Historical Center Michigan State University College of Law: Animallaw.info 2010 Retrieved August 26, 2010, from
5. Babbie E. Survey research methods 1990 Belmont, CA Wadsworth Publishing Company
6. Bratton K. A. , Haynie K. L. "Agenda setting and legislative success in state legislatures: The effects of gender and race" Journal of Politics 1999 Vol 61 3 658 679 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2647822
7. Broida J. , Tingley L. , Kimball R. , Miele J. "Personality differences between pro- and anti-vivisectionists" Society & Animals 1993 Vol 1 2 129 144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853093X00037
8. Bullock C. , MacManus S. "Policy responsiveness to the Black electorate: Programmatic versus symbolic representation" American Politics Quarterly 1981 Vol 9 3 357 368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X8100900306
9. Carlson J. M. , Hyde M. S. Doing empirical research 2003 Boston, MA Houghton Mifflin
10. Dodson D. L. The impact of women in congress 2006 New York, NY Oxford University Press http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198296746.001.0001
11. Day C. L. "State legislative voting patterns on abortion restrictions in Louisiana" Women & Politics 1994 Vol 14 2 45 63 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.1994.9970700
12. Einwohner R. L. "Gender, class, and social movement outcomes: Identity and effectiveness in two animal rights campaigns" Gender & Society 1999 Vol 13 1 56 76 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124399013001004
13. Finsen L. , Finsen S. The animal rights movement in America: From compassion to respect 1994 New York, NY Twayne Publishers
14. Francione G. L. Animals, property, and the law 1995 Philadelphia, PA Temple University Press
15. Garner R. Animals, politics, and morality 1993 Manchester, United Kingdom Manchester University Press
16. Garner R. "Animal protection and legislators in Britain and the United States" The Journal of Legislative Studies 1999 Vol 5 2 92 114
17. Hardy M. A. Regression with dummy variables Sage University series on quantitative applications in the social sciences 1993 Newbury Park, CA Sage Publications 07 093
18. Heleski C. R. , Mertig A. G. , Zanella A. J. "Stakeholder attitudes toward farm animal welfare" Anthrozoös 2006 Vol 19 4 290 307 http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/089279306785415439
19. Herring M. "Legislative responsiveness to Black constituents in three deep South states" Journal of Politics 1990 Vol 52 3 740 756 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2131825
20. Herzog H. "Gender differences in human-animal interactions: A review" Anthrozoös 2007 Vol 20 1 7 21 http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/089279307780216687
21. Hopper M. K. "Gallegly backs effort to end barbaric cruelty" The Hill 2009 September 30 6
22. House Passes Farm Animal Bill Grand Rapids Press 2009 September 17 A15
23. Hudak M. Western turf wars: The politics of public lands ranching 2007 Binghamton, NY Biome Books
24. Humane Society of the United States 2009 Mich. Gov. Granholm signs historic farm animal welfare measure. Retrieved July 3, 3013, from .
25. Illinois General Assembly 2007 Ninety-Fifth General Assembly House roll call vote, HB 1711. Retrieved August 29, 2010, from .
26. Illinois General Assembly 2009 Illinois state representatives: Ninety-Sixth General Assembly. Retrieved October 1, 2010, from .
27. Inglehart R. "Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity" American Political Science Review 1981 Vol 75 4 880 900 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1962290
28. Inglehart R. "The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial Europe" American Political Science Review 1971 Vol 65 4 991 1017 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1953494
29. Jamison W. V. , Lunch W. M. "Rights of animals, perceptions of science, and political activism: Profile of American rights activists" Science, Technology, & Human Values 1992 Vol 17 4 438 458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700402
30. Jerlomack C. "Tracing the profile of animal rights supporters: A preliminary investigation" Society & Animals 2003 Vol 11 3 246 263
31. Jewell M. E. Representation in state legislatures 1982 Lexington, KY University of Kentucky Press
32. Johnson J. B. , Reynolds H. T. Political science research methods, 5th edition 2005 Washington, DC Congressional Quarterly Press
33. Kanter R. M. Men and women of the corporation 1977 New York, NY Basic Books
34. Kenney S. J. "New research on gendered political institutions" Political Research Quarterly 1996 Vol 49 2 445 466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591299604900211
35. Kruse C. R. "Gender, views of nature, and supporters of animal rights" Society & Animals 1999 Vol 7 3 179 198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853099X00077
36. Little T. H. , Ogle D. B. The legislative branch of state government: People, process, and politics 2006 Santa Barbara, CA ABC-CLIO
37. Lusk J. L. , Norwood F. B. "A survey to determine public opinion about the ethics and governance of farm animal welfare" Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2008 Vol 233 7 1121 1126 http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.233.7.1121
38. Lutz B. J. , Lutz J. M. "Interest groups and pro-animal rights legislation" Society & Animals 2011 Vol 19 3 261 277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853011X578929
39. Manning L. L. "Marine mammals and fisheries conflicts: A philosophical debate" Ocean & Shoreline Management 1989 Vol 12 3 217 232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0951-8312(89)90004-0
40. McKinney D. , Woodward W. "Horse-slaughter foes win first round: votes to ban killing animals for human consumption" Chicago Sun Times 2007 April 19 34
41. Menard S. Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage university paper series on quantitative application in the social sciences, 07-106 1995 Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications
42. Menifield C. E. , Shaffer S. Politics in the new South: Representation of African Americans in Southern state legislatures 2005 Albany, NY State University of New York Press
43. Michigan General Assembly 2009 Representatives. Last retrieved October 1, 2010, from .
44. Morehouse S. M. , Jewell M. E. State politics, parties, & policy 2003 2nd ed. Lanham, MD Rowman & Littlefield
45. Nagelkerke N. J .D. "A note on the general definition of the coefficient of determination" Biometrika 1991 Vol 78 3 691 692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
46. Nibert D. A. "Animal rights and human social issues" Society & Animals 1994 Vol 2 2 115 124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853094X00135
47. Peek C. W. , Bell N. J. , Dunham C. C. "Gender, gender ideology, and animal rights advocacy" Gender & Society 1996 Vol 10 4 464 478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124396010004007
48. Pitkin H. The concept of representation 1967 Berkeley, CA University of California Press
49. Regan T. The case for animal rights 1983 Berkeley, CA University of California Press
50. Rollin B. E. "Animal welfare, animal rights, and agriculture" Journal of Animal Science, 1990 Vol 68 10 3456 3461
51. Schecter D. "What drives the abortion voting policy? Investigating partisanship and religion in the state legislative arena" Women & Politics 2001 Vol 23 4 61 83 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J014v23n04_03
52. Scully M. "A religious case for compassion for animals" 2010 Retrieved October 7, 2010, from .
53. Singer P. Animal liberation 1975 New York, NY Avon Books
54. Stallman B. "The Ag agenda: Animal warfare coming to your state soon. American Farm Bureau" 2007 Retrieved October 7, 2010, from, .
55. State of Michigan "Journal of the House of Representatives, 95th Legislature" 2009 Retrieved October 7, 2010, from .
56. United States Census Bureau "Fast facts. United States Census" 2010 Retrieved October 13, 2010, from .
57. Wise S. M. Rattling the cage: Toward legal rights for animals 2000 Cambridge: MA Perseus Books
58. Witt S. L. , Moncrief G. "Religion and roll call voting in Idaho: The 1990 abortion controversy" American Politics Quarterly 1993 Vol 21 1 140 149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9302100109
59. Yamane D. , Oldmixon E. A. "Religion in the state legislative arena: Affiliation, salience, advocacy, and public policy making" Legislative Studies Quarterly 2006 Vol 31 3 433 460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3162/036298006X201878
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341313
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341313
2013-01-01
2018-06-24
rss email facebook twitter
share this

Sign-in

Can't access your account?

Register

Register now to access more content

  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Society & Animals — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations

  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation
arrow back to top arrow