Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Public Perceptions of Mental Capacities of Nonhuman Animals

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Finnish Population Survey

image of Society & Animals

Mental capacities are an essential basis on which people give moral concern to nonhuman animals. Hence, it is important to investigate public perceptions of animal mind and the factors underlying these perceptions. Although research into citizen beliefs in animal mind has been increasing, population-based studies utilizing multivariate methods have been scarce. In this article, public perceptions of animal mind are investigated with a nationwide survey in Finland (n = 1,824). Eight animal species positioned differently in cultural categorizations are included in the analysis. Dogs were ascribed the most capacities, followed by cows, pigs, wolves, and elk. Citizens expressed a low belief in the mental capacities of chicken, salmon, and shrimp. Classifying animals as companions, food, and threat influences the perceptions of animal mind. Young age, having a companion animal, valuing societal equality, and concern for animal welfare and for animal utilization are connected to a greater belief in animal mind.

Affiliations: 1: University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Social Sciences and Business Studies, Department of Geographical and Historical Studies JoensuuFinlandFinnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Environmental Policy Centre HelsinkiFinland saara.kupsala@uef.fi ; 2: University of Tampere, School of Management TampereFinland ; 3: University of Turku, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Research TurkuFinland

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341423
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Arluke A., Sanders C. R. Regarding animals 1996 Philadelphia, PA Temple University Press
2. Bastian B., Costello K., Loughnan S., Hodson G."When closing the human–animal divide expands moral concern: The importance of framing" Social Psychological and Personality Science 2012Vol 3 4 421 429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1948550611425106
3. Bastian B., Loughnan S., Haslam N., Radke H. R. M."Don’t mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption" Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2011Vol 38 2 247 256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167211424291
4. Bisi J., Liukkonen T., Mykrä S., Pohja-Mykrä M., Kurki S."The good bad wolf—Wolf evaluation reveals the roots of the Finnish wolf conflict" European Journal of Wildlife Research 2010Vol 56 5 771 779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-010-0374-0
5. Boissy A., Arnould C., Chaillou E., Désiré L., Duvaux-Ponter C., Greiveldinger L., Veissier I."Emotions and cognition: A new approach to animal welfare" Animal Welfare 2007Vol 16 2 37 43
6. Borgström S."Legitimacy issues in Finnish wolf conservation" Journal of Environmental Law 2012Vol 24 3 451 476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqs015
7. Brown C."Fish intelligence, sentience and ethics" Animal Cognition 2015Vol 18 1 1 17 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0761-0
8. Costello K., Hodson G."Exploring the roots of dehumanization: The role of animal–human similarity in promoting immigrant humanization" Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2010Vol 13 1 3 22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430209347725
9. Deemer D. R., Lobao L. R."Public concern with farm-animal welfare: Religion, politics, and human disadvantage in the food sector" Rural Sociology 2011Vol 76 2 167 196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2010.00044.x
10. Dhont K., Hodson G., Costello K., MacInnis C. C."Social dominance orientation connects prejudicial human–human and human–animal relations" Personality and Individual Differences 2014 April-MayVol 61-62 105 108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.020
11. Duncan I. J. H."The changing concept of animal sentience" Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2006Vol 100 1-2 11 19 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.011
12. Eddy T. J., Gallup G. G. Jr., Povinelli D. J."Attribution of cognitive states to animals: Anthropomorphism in comparative perspective" Journal of Social Issues 1993Vol 49 1 87 101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00910.x
13. Elwood R. W."Evidence for pain in decapod crustaceans" Animal Welfare 2012Vol 21 1 23 27 http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13353700593365
14. Francione G. L. Animals as persons: Essays on the abolition of animal exploitation 2008 New York, NY Columbia University Press
15. Gieling E., Nordquist R., Staay F."Assessing learning and memory in pigs" Animal Cognition 2011Vol 14 2 151 173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0364-3
16. Griffin D., Speck G."New evidence of animal consciousness" Animal Cognition 2004Vol 7 1 5 18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0203-x
17. Herzog H. A. Jr., Galvin S. Mitchell R. W., Thompson N. S., Miles H. L."Common sense and the mental lives of animals: An empirical approach" Anthropomorphism, anecdotes, and animals 1997 Albany, NY State University of New York Press 237 253
18. Hills A. M."Empathy and belief in the mental experience of animals" Anthrozoös 1995Vol 8 3 132 142 http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/089279395787156347
19. Horowitz A. C. Bekoff M."Anthropomorphism" Encyclopedia of human–animal relationships: A global exploration of our connections with animals 2007 Westport, CT Greenwood Press 60 66
20. Horvath K., Angeletti D., Nascetti G., Carere C."Invertebrate welfare: An overlooked issue" Ann Ist Super Sanita 2013Vol 49 1 9 17
21. Irvine L."The question of animal selves: Implications for sociological knowledge and practice" Qualitative Sociology Review 2007Vol 3 1 5 22
22. Irvine L."Animals and sociology" Sociology Compass 2008Vol 2 6 1954 1971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00163.x
23. Kaldewaij F. Armstrong S. J., Botzler R. G."Animals and the harm of death" The animal ethics reader 2008 Oxon, United Kingdom Routledge 59 62
24. Kendall H. A., Lobao L. M., Sharp J. S."Public concern with animal well-being: Place, social structural location, and individual experience" Rural Sociology 2006Vol 71 3 399 428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1526/003601106778070617
25. Knight S., Vrij A., Bard K., Brandon D."Science versus human welfare? Understanding attitudes toward animal use" Journal of Social Issues 2009Vol 65 3 463 483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01609.x
26. Knight S., Vrij A., Cherryman J., Nunkoosing K."Attitudes towards animal use and belief in animal mind" Anthrozoös 2004Vol 17 1 43 62 http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/089279304786991945
27. Kupsala S., Jokinen P., Vinnari M."Who cares about farmed fish? Citizen perceptions of the welfare and the mental abilities of fish" Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2013Vol 26 1 119 135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10806-011-9369-4
28. Low P., Panksepp J., Reiss D., Edelman D., Van Swinderen B., Koch C."The Cambridge declaration on consciousness" 2012 Retrieved April 26, 2015, from
29. Maust-Mohl M., Fraser J., Morrison R."Wild minds: What people think about animal thinking" Anthrozoös 2012Vol 25 2 133 147 http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175303712X13316289505224
30. McGrath N., Walker J., Nilsson D., Phillips C."Public attitudes towards grief in animals" Animal Welfare 2013Vol 22 1 33 47 http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.1.033
31. Mitchell R. W., Hamm M."The interpretation of animal psychology: Anthropomorphism or behavior reading?" Behaviour 1997Vol 134 3/4 173 204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853997X00449
32. Morris P. H., Doe C., Godsell E."Secondary emotions in non-primate species? Behavioural reports and subjective claims by animal owners" Cognition & Emotion 2008Vol 22 1 3 20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930701273716
33. Morris P., Knight S., Lesley S."Belief in animal mind: Does familiarity with animals influence beliefs about animal emotions?" Society & Animals 2012Vol 20 3 211 224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341234
34. Noske B."The animal question in anthropology: A commentary" Society & Animals 1993Vol 1 2 185 190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853093X00073
35. Panksepp J."Cross-species affective neuroscience decoding of the primal affective experiences of humans and related animals" PLoS ONE 2011Vol 6 9 e21236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021236
36. Paul E. S."Empathy with animals and with humans: Are they linked?" Anthrozoös 2000Vol 13 4 194 202 http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/089279300786999699
37. Phillips C. J. C., McCulloch S."Student attitudes on animal sentience and use of animals in society" Journal of Biological Education 2005Vol 40 1 17 24 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9656004
38. Phillips C. J. C., Izmirli S., Aldavood J., Alonso M., Choe B., Hanlon A., Rehn T."An international comparison of female and male students’ attitudes to the use of animals" Animals 2010Vol 1 1 7 26 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani1010007
39. Rollin B. E."Scientific ideology, anthropomorphism, anecdote, and ethics" New Ideas in Psychology 2000Vol 18 1 109 118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0732-118X(99)00040-9
40. Ruby M. B., Heine S. J."Too close to home. Factors predicting meat avoidance" Appetite 2012Vol 59 1 47 52 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.03.020
41. Sanders C. R. Understanding dogs: Living and working with canine companions 1999 Philadelphia, PA Temple University Press
42. Sandøe P., Christiansen S. B. Millar K., West P. H., Nerlich B."Animal futures: The changing face of animal ethics" Ethical futures: Biosciences and food horizons 2009 Wageningen, The Netherlands Wageningen Academic Publishers 27 33
43. Serpell J. In the company of animals: A study of human–animal relationships 1996 Cambridge, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press
44. Sherwin C. M."Can invertebrates suffer? Or, how robust is argument-by-analogy?" Animal Welfare 2001Vol 10 1 103 118
45. Singer P. Animal liberation 1975 London, United Kingdom Pimlico
46. Statistics Finland"Statistics Finland’s PX-Web databases. Table: Population according to age (1-year), sex, marital status and language by area 1990-2014" 2014a Retrieved December 10, 2015, from
47. Statistics Finland"Statistics Finland’s PX-Web databases. Table: Population aged 15 or over by level of education, municipality, gender and age 1970-2014" 2014b Retrieved December 10, 2015, from
48. Walker J. K., McGrath N., Handel I. G., Waran N. K., Phillips C. J. C."Does owning a companion animal influence the belief that animals experience emotions such as grief?" Animal Welfare 2014Vol 23 1 71 79 http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.23.1.071
49. Walker J. K., McGrath N., Nilsson D. L., Waran N. K., Phillips C. J. C."The role of gender in public perception of whether animals can experience grief and other emotions" Anthrozoös 2014Vol 27 2 251 266 http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175303714X13903827487601
50. Young R. L., Thompson C. Y. Denzin N. K."The selves of other animals: Reconsidering Mead in light of multidisciplinary evidence" 40th anniversary of studies in symbolic interaction 2013 Bingley, United Kingdom Emerald Group Publishing Limited 467 483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S0163-2396(2013)0000040023
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341423
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341423
2016-10-11
2016-12-10

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Society & Animals — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation