Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Relationships between Knowledge of Chicken Production Systems and Advocacy by Animal Protection Workers

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Society & Animals

Animal protection organizations expect their staff to understand and support high welfare standards in animal production. Relationships between Australian animal protection organization workers’ knowledge of chicken production systems, purchasing behavior, and opinion-leading behavior were investigated. Forty-five percent of knowledge questions were answered correctly. Knowledge was mostly gained from animal protection organizations and online literature. Knowledgeable respondents were more critical of both conventional and free range/organic chicken systems and were more likely to avoid eating chicken meat, but not eggs. They were more likely to approach those responsible, in government or industry, about welfare issues and were more likely to discuss animal welfare issues at work and in a social setting. They were also more likely to ask questions about animal welfare standards of food provided at butchers, farmers’ markets, social meals, and restaurants/cafés. Therefore, knowledge was linked to advocacy for improved animal welfare by animal protection organization workers.

Affiliations: 1: Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland GattonAustralia ; 2: Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland GattonAustralia c.phillips@uq.edu.au

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341463
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Animals Australia 2012 Eggs Demystified Retrieved from http://www.animalsaustralia.org/features/eggs-demystified.php.
2. Animals Australia n.d. Broiler Chickens Fact Sheet Retrieved from http://www.animalsaustralia.org/factsheets/broiler_chickens.php.
3. Australian Chicken Meat Federation. (acmf) 2011 General Questions: Growing Meat Chickens "Australian Chicken Meat Federation Inc." Retrieved from http://www.chicken.org.au/page.php?id=6#20.
4. Bergmann I., Von der Heidt T., Maller C. 2010 "Cognitive dissonance and individuals’ response strategies as a basis for audience segmentation to reduce factory farmed meat consumption, Southern Cross Business School" Southern Cross University ePublications@scu Retrieved from http://epubs.scu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1400&context=comm_pubs.
5. Biondo A. E. 2014 "Organic food and the double adverse selection: ignorance and social welfare." Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems Vol 38 230 242 [Crossref]
6. Boyle J. 2007 Becoming Vegetarian, an Analysis of the Vegetarian Career Using an Integrated Model of Deviance Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05012007-104133/unrestricted/Boyle_Sociology_Dissertation_May071.pdf.
7. Choi H., Reid L. N. 2014 "Students as subjects in food advertising studies. An appraisal of appropriateness" Appetite Vol 81 218 224 [Crossref]
8. De Bakker E., Dagevos H. 2012 "Reducing meat consumption in today’s consumer society, questioning the citizen-consumer gap" Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Vol 25 877 894 [Crossref]
9. DeLeeuw J., Galen L., Aebersold C., Stanton V. 2007 "Support for animal rights as a function of belief in evolution, religious fundamentalism, and religious denomination" Society & Animals Vol 15 353 363 [Crossref]
10. Evans A., Miele M. 2007 Consumers’ Views about Farm Animal Welfare Part 1, National Reports based on Focus Group Research, Welfare Quality, Cardiff, UK Retrieved from http//www.welfarequality.net/everyone/40889/7/0/22.
11. Farm Animal Welfare Council. (fawc) 2007 Five Freedoms Retrieved from www.fawc.org.uk/freedoms.htm.
12. Greenebaum J. 2012 "Managing impressions, “face-saving” strategies of vegetarians and vegans" Humanity and Society Vol 36 309 325 [Crossref]
13. Herzog H. 2007 "Gender differences in human animal interactions, a review" Anthrozoos Vol 20 7 21 [Crossref]
14. Jerolmack C. 2003 "Tracing the profile of animal rights supporters, a preliminary investigation" Society & Animals Vol 11 246 263 [Crossref]
15. Katz E. 2011 Encyclopaedia of Consumer Culture, Opinion Leaders. Sage Publications Inc. 1058 1059 Retrieved from http://knowledge.sagepub.com.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/view/consumerculture/n390.xml.
16. Kjærnes U., Miele M., Roex J. 2007 Attitudes of Consumers, Retailers and Producers to Farm Animal Welfare, Welfare Quality Network, Cardiff, UK Retrieved from http://www.welfarequality.net/everyone/37097/7/0/22.
17. McEachern M., Warnaby G. 2008 "Exploring the relationship between consumer knowledge and purchase behaviour of value based labels" International Journal of Consumer Studies Vol 32 414 426 [Crossref]
18. Meat & Livestock Australia (mla) 2012 Hormone Growth Promotants. Retrieved from http://www.mla.com.au/Cattle-sheep-and-goat-industries/Food-safety-and-quality/Hormone-growth-promotants.
19. Phillips C. J. C., Izmirli S. 2012 "The effects of level of support for animal protection organisations on attitudes to the use of animals and other social issues" Animal Welfare Vol 21 583 592 [Crossref]
20. rspca Australia 2010 What are the welfare issues relating to meat chicken production Retrieved from http://kb.rspca.org.au/What-are-the-welfare-issues-relating-to-meat-chicken-production_85.html.
21. rspca Australia 2012 Frequently Asked Questions Retrieved from http://www.hensdeservebetter.org.au/the-details/faq.html.
22. rspca Darwin 2013 Volunteering Retrieved from http://www.rspcadarwin.org.au/pages/Volunteering.html.
23. rspca Queensland 2011 Volunteer Retrieved from http://www.rspcaqld.org.au/en/HowtoHelp/Volunteer.
24. Toma L., Stott A., Revoredo-Giha C., Kupiec-Teahan B. 2012 "Consumers and animal welfare, a comparison between European Union countries" Appetite Vol 58 597 607 [Crossref]
25. Toyne P., Cowell C., Mech T. 2004 Marketing Agricultural Sustainability, Driving Environmental Improvement with Marketplace Benefits from Environmental Labelling, Canberra: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Australian Government Retrieved from https://rirdc.infoservices.com.au/items/04-050.
26. Tsakiridou E., Tsakiridou H., Mattas K., Arvaniti E. 2010 "Effects of animal welfare standards on consumers’ food choices" Food Economics—Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C Vol 7 234 244 [Crossref]
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341463
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341463
2018-02-20
2018-08-15

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Society & Animals — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation