Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Deprivation as Un-Experienced Harm?

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

A Critical Analysis of Tom Regan’s Principle of Harm

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this advance article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality
image of Society & Animals

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy, University of Tartu TartuEstonia kulli.keerus@ut.ee ; 2: Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen FrederiksbergDenmark ; 3: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences UppsalaSweden

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341467
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341467
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685306-12341467
2017-07-18
2018-07-20
1. Algers B."Natürliches verhalten—ein natürlicher begriff" Berliner und Münchener Tierärzliche Wochenschrift 1992Vol 105 11 372 374
2. Appleby M. C., Sandøe P."Philosophical debate on the nature of well-being: implications for animal welfare" Animal Welfare 2002Vol 11 3 283 294
3. Broom D. M."Indicators of poor welfare" British Veterinary Journal 1986Vol 142 6 524 526 [Crossref]
4. Broom D. M."Animal welfare: concepts and measurement" Journal of Animal Science 1991Vol 69 10 4167 4175 [Crossref]
5. Dawkins M. S."A user’s guide to animal welfare science" Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2006Vol 21 2 77 82 [Crossref]
6. Duncan I. J. H."Welfare is to do with what animals feel" Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 1993Vol 6 Supplement 2 8 14
7. Duncan I. J. H."Animal welfare defined in terms of feelings" Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A: Animal Science 1996 Supplement 27 29 35
8. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes 2010
9. Fraser D., Weary D. M., Pajor E. A., Milligan B. N."A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns" Animal Welfare 1997Vol 6 3 187 205
10. Kiley-Worthington M."Ecological, ethological, and ethically sound environments for animals: toward symbiosis." Journal of Agricultural Ethics 1989Vol 2 4 323 347 [Crossref]
11. Lund V., Röcklinsberg H."Outlining a conception of animal welfare for organic farming systems" Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 2001Vol 14 4 391 424 [Crossref]
12. Regan T. The case for animal rights 1983 Berkeley, CA University of California Press
13. Regan T."Preface to the 2004 edition" The case for animal rights 2004 Berkeley, CA University of California Press xi xlix
14. Rollin B. E."Animal welfare science and value" Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 1993Vol 6 Supplement 2 44 50
15. Yeates J. W., Röcklinsberg H., Gjerris M."Is welfare all that matters? A discussion of what should be included in policymaking regarding animals" Animal Welfare 2011Vol 20 3 423 432
Submit comment
Close
Comment moderation successfully completed

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation