Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Between Dialectic and Rhetoric:Rhetorical Questions Expressing Premises inBiblical Prose Argumentation1

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Vetus Testamentum

Rhetorical questions expressing premises are situated at the intersection of two disciplines whose object of study is argumentation: dialectic and rhetoric. This paper examines arguments in biblical prose whose premises take the form of rhetorical questions, utilizing insights from modern dialectical and rhetorical theories of argumentation. The corpus for this study is the prose portions of Genesis-2 Kings. The nearly 130 arguments in the corpus were found to exhibit clear logical structures after undergoing reconstruction, although these structures are not necessarily deductively valid. In this, biblical arguments are typical of argumentation in natural conversation. With a few exceptions, the modes of argumentation can be classified as modus tollens, denying the antecedent, argument by consequences, or inductive reasoning. The rhetorical question plays a significant rhetorical role in these arguments, boosting the persuasive force of a disputed premise or a less-than-compelling logical relation between premises and conclusion.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Hebrew Language and Semitic LanguagesBar Ilan UniversityIsraeladinamoshavi@gmail.com

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685330-12341182
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Crenshaw J. L. " Education in Ancient Israel: Across the Deadening Silence " Anchor Bible Reference Library 1998 New York
2. Eemeren F. H. van , Grootendorst R. " Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion " Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis 1 1984 Dordrecht
3. Eemeren F. H. van , Grootendorst R. " Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective " 1992 Hillsdale, NJ
4. Eemeren F. H. van , Grootendorst R. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach 2004 Cambridge
5. Eemeren F. H. Van , Houtlosser P. " Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis " Argumentation Library 6 2002 Dordrecht
6. Eemeren F. H. Van , Houtlosser P. "“Strategic Maneuvering: A Synthetic Recapitulation,”" Argumentation 20 2006 381 392
7. Gerritsen S. Eemeren F. H. van "“Unexpressed Premises,”" Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory 2001 Amsterdam 51 79 2001
8. Gitay Y. " Prophecy and Persuasion: A Study of Isaiah 40-48 " Forum Theologiae Linguisticae 14 1981 Bonn
9. Gitay Y. "“The Role of Rhetoric in the Rise of Leadership: The Case of Judah”" JSem 14 2005 112 148
10. Gitay Y. "“Biblical Rhetoric: The Art of Religious Dialogue,”" J for Sem 18 2009 34 56
11. Godden D. M. , Walton D. "“Denying the Antecedent as a Legitimate Argumentative Strategy: A Dialectical Model,”" Informal Logic 24 2004 219 43
12. Greenstein E. L. "“Some Developments in the Study of Language and some Implications for Interpreting Ancient Texts and Cultures,”" IOS20 2002 441 479
13. Greenstein E. L. "“Truth or Theodicy? Speaking Truth to Power in the Book of Job,”" Princeton Seminary Bulletin 27 2006 238 258
14. Herzog E. "“The Triple Rhetorical Argument: An Expression of Syllogism in the Bible,”" Beit Mikra 54 2009 62 82 Hebr.
15. Ilie C. " What Else Can I Tell You? A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive and Argumentative Acts " Stockholm Studies in English 82 1994 Stockholm
16. Jansen H. "“Refuting a Standpoint by Appealing to Its Outcomes: Reductio ad Absurdum vs.Argument from Consequences,”" Informal Logic 2007 Vol 27 249 266
17. Johnson R. E. "“The Rhetorical Question as a Literary Device in Ecclesiastes,”" 1986 Ph.D. diss., Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
18. Kuntz K. J. Broyles C. C. , Evans C. A. "“The Form, Location, and Function of Rhetorical Questions in Deutero-Isaiah,”" Writing and Reading the Scroll of Isaiah; Studies of an Interpretive Tradition, VTSup 70 1997 Vol 1 121 141
19. Labuschagne C. J. " The Incomparability of Yahweh in the Old Testament " Pretoria Oriental Series 5 1966 Leiden
20. Livnat Z. Khan Geoffrey "“Rhetoric,”" Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics 2013 Vol vol. 4 Leiden 416 418
21. May J. D. van Eemeren Frans H. , et al "“Practical Arguments,”" Proceed-ings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation 1991 Amsterdam 259 266 June 19-22, 1990
22. Moshavi A. "“Two Types of Argumentation Involving Rhetorical Questions in Biblical Hebrew Dialogue,”" Bib 90 2009 32 46
23. Moshavi A. "“Rhetorical Question or Assertion: The Pragmatics of הלא in Biblical Hebrew,”" JANES32 2010 91 105
24. Moshavi A. "“Can a Positive Rhetorical Question have a Positive Answer in the Bible,”" JSS56 2011 253 273
25. Moshavi A. "“What Can I Say? Implications and Communicative Functions of Rhetorical ‘WH’ Questions in Classical Biblical Hebrew Prose,”" VT 64 2014 93 108
26. Perelman C. , Olbrechts-Tyteca L. Wilkinson J. , Weaver P. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation 1969 Notre Dame, IN
27. Selms A. van "“Motivated Interrogative Sentences in Biblical Hebrew,”" Sem 2 1971-1972 143 149
28. Selms A. van "“Motivated Interrogative Sentences in the Book of Job,”" Sem 6 1978 28 35
29. Stone M. "“Denying the Antecedent: Its Effective Use in Argumentation,”" Informal Logic 32 2012 327 356
30. Walton D. N. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning 1996a Mahwah, NJ
31. Walton D. N. Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory 1996b Toronto Toronto Studies in Philosophy
32. Walton D. N. The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument 1998 Toronto
33. Walton D. N. , Reed C. A. "“Argumentation Schemes and Enthymemes,”" Synthese 143 2005 339 370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-6198-x
34. Whybray R. N. " The Heavenly Counsellor in Isaiah xl 13-14: A Study of the Sources of the Theology of Deutero-Isaiah " sotsMonograph Series 1 2008 Cambridge
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685330-12341182
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685330-12341182
2015-01-28
2018-07-21

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Vetus Testamentum — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation