Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

"HOW LONG ARE YOU SLACK TO GO TO POSSESS THE LAND" ( JOS. XVIII 3): IDEAL AND REALITY IN THE DISTRIBUTION DESCRIPTIONS IN JOSHUA XIII-XIX

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Vetus Testamentum

The chapters of the land distribution in the Book of Joshua have received a great deal of attention both from historical and geographical aspects. This article examines their ideological and theological significance. Jos. xiii-xix contains two different divisions of the land. The first division is followed by the portions of Judah, Ephraim, and Manasseh, while the second distribution relates to the territories of the remaining seven tribes. What is the rationale of the two distribution accounts? The thesis in this paper is that in the first division, the entire land, including the remaining unconquered land, was apportioned to the nine and one half tribes, in accordance with the divine precept. The settlement entailed the continuation of the conquest, each tribe acting independently. Judah, Manasseh and Ephraim, fulfilled this task, while, the other seven tribes did not do so. Joshua complained against this. However, he immediately conducted a second division of the land, that encompasses a much more limited area, that was already held by the Israelites, leaving out the remaining land in the north. The inclusion of the two apportionings is meant to show the partial failure of the Israelites during the period of the settlement. This study demonstrates that even in purely geographical texts of the Bible, we cannot ignore the authors' predominant theology interests.

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853303321095844
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853303321095844
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853303321095844
2003-01-01
2016-09-26

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation