Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Emergence of Graphing Practices in Scientific Research

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Cognition and Culture

Graphing has long counted as one of the quintessential process skills that scientists apply independently of particular situations. However, recent expert/expert studies showed that when asked to interpret graphs culled from undergraduate courses of their own disciplines, scientists were far from perfect in providing interpretations that a course instructor would have accepted as correct. Drawing on five years of fieldwork, the present study was designed to investigate graphs and graph-related skills in scientific research. In addition to the fieldwork, a think-aloud protocol was used to elicit scientists' graph interpretations both on familiar and unfamiliar graphs. The analyses show that graph-related skills such as perceiving relevant graphical detail and interpreting the source of this detail emerge in the research process and are related to the scientists' increasing familiarity with a research object, instrumentation, and their understanding of the transformation process that turns raw data into graphs. When scientists do not know the natural object represented in a graph and are unfamiliar with the details of the corresponding data collection protocol, they often focus on graphical features that do not pertain to the phenomenon represented and therefore do not arrive at the correct interpretations. Based on these data, it is proposed that graphs are not only the outcomes of scientific research but also, in important ways, constitute representations that bear metonymic relations to the research context, most importantly to instrumentation, natural phenomenon, and the mathematical transformations used to produce the graphs from the raw data. I draw on the semantics of symbolic systems for articulating competencies and breakdowns in scientists' graphing-related practices.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Journal of Cognition and Culture — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation