Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Full Access Is the Use of Averaging in Advice Taking Modulated by Culture?

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Is the Use of Averaging in Advice Taking Modulated by Culture?

  • PDF
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Cognition and Culture

AbstractMany recent experiments have explored the way people take advice into account. It has been observed that in so doing participants often rely on one of the two following strategies: averaging between the different opinions or choosing one of the opinions, as opposed to using more complex weighting strategies. While several factors that affect strategy choice have been investigated, no attention has been paid to potential cultural variations. Among the many relevant cross-cultural differences, results have show that Easterners tend to favor compromise more than Westerners, a difference that could translate into a greater preference for averaging in Eastern population. In Experiment 1, we confronted Japanese and French participants to two pieces of advice and asked them to form an aggregate answer. In Experiment 2, participants had to aggregate their own opinion and a piece of advice. In neither of the experiments were the Japanese more likely to use averaging than the French. Explanations for this robust absence of difference are suggested. The only difference that emerged was that the Japanese were more likely to choose the advice and less likely to choose their own answer than the French. Different interpretations of this result are discussed, including the possibility that it is an artefact of a theoretically irrelevant difference between the populations under study.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Ariely D. Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions 2008 Harper, New York, NY.
2. Ariely D. , Levav J. "Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed" Journal of Consumer Research 2000 Vol 27 279 290 [Crossref]
3. Bonaccio S. , Dalal R. "Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences" Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2006 Vol 101 127 151 [Crossref]
4. Briley D. , Morris M. , Simonson I. "Reasons as carriers of culture: Dynamic versus dispositional models of cultural influence on decision making" Journal of Consumer Research 2000 Vol 27 157 178 [Crossref]
5. Huss B. "Cultural differences and the law of noncontradiction: some criteria for further research" Philosophical Psychology 2004 Vol 17 375 389 [Crossref]
6. Larrick R. , Soll J. "Intuitions about combining opinions: Misappreciation of the averaging principle" Management Science 2006 Vol 52 111 127 [Crossref]
7. Mercier H. "On the universality of argumentative reasoning" Journal of Cognition and Culture 2011 Vol 11 85 113 [Crossref]
8. Minson J. A. , Liberman V. , Ross L. "Two to tango: effects of collaborative experience and disagreement on dyadic judgment" Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2011 Vol 37 1325 1338 [Crossref]
9. Peng K. , Nisbett R. "Culture, dialectics and reasoning about contradiction" American Psychologist 1999 Vol 54 741 754 [Crossref]
10. Soll J. "Intuitive theories of information: Beliefs about the value of redundancy" Cognitive Psychology 1999 Vol 38 317 346 [Crossref]
11. Soll J. , Larrick R. "Strategies for Revising Judgment: How (and How Well) People Use Others’ Opinions" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009 Vol 35 780 805 [Crossref]
12. Triandis H. C. , Suh E. M. "Cultural influences on personality" Annual Review of Psychology 2002 Vol 53 133 160 [Crossref]
13. Van der Henst J. , Mercier H. , Yama H. , Kawasaki Y. , Adachi K. "Dealing with contradiction in a communicative context: A cross-cultural study" Intercultural Pragmatics 2007 Vol 3 487 502
14. Wu S. , Keysar B. "The effect of culture on perspective taking" Psychological Science 2007 Vol 18 600 [Crossref]
15. Yamagishi T. , Kiyonari T. "The group as the container of generalized reciprocity" Social Psychology Quarterly 2000 Vol 63 116 132 [Crossref]
16. Yaniv I. "Weighting and trimming: Heuristics for aggregating judgments under uncertainty" Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1997 Vol 69 237 249 [Crossref]
17. Yaniv I. "Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit" Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2004 Vol 93 1 13 [Crossref]
18. Yaniv I. , Kleinberger E. "Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation" Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2000 Vol 83 260 281 [Crossref]

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation