Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Full Access What Goes Around Comes Around: The Evolutionary Roots of the Belief in Immanent Justice

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

What Goes Around Comes Around: The Evolutionary Roots of the Belief in Immanent Justice

  • PDF
Add to Favorites

image of Journal of Cognition and Culture

AbstractThe belief in immanent justice is the expectation that the universe is designed to ensure that evil is punished and virtue rewarded. What makes this belief so ‘natural’? Here, we suggest that this intuition of immanent justice derives from our evolved sense of fairness. In cases where a misdeed is followed by a misfortune, our sense of fairness construes the misfortune as a way to compensate for the misdeed. To test this hypothesis, we designed a set of studies in which we show that people who do not believe in immanent justice are nonetheless implicitly influenced by intuitions of immanent justice. Strikingly, this effect disappears when the misfortune is disproportionate compared to the misdeed: In this case, justice is not restored and participants lose the intuition of immanent justice. Following recent theories of religion, we suggest that this intuition contributes to the cultural success of beliefs in immanent justice.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Alexander R. The biology of moral systems 1987 Hawthorne, NY De Gruyter
2. André J. B. , Baumard N. "Social opportunities and the evolution of fairness" Journal of Theoretical Biology 2011 Vol 289 128 135
3. Astuti R. "La moralité des conventions: tabous ancestraux à Madagascar [The morality of conventions: Ancestral taboos in Madagascar]" Terrain 2007 Vol 48 101 112
4. Barrett H. , Kurzban R. "Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate" Psychological Review 2006 Vol 113 628 647
5. Barrett J. "Exploring the natural foundations of religion" Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000 Vol 4 29 34
6. Baumard N. "Punishment is not a group adaptation: humans punish to restore fairness rather than to support group cooperation" Mind and Society 2011 Vol 10 1 26
7. Baumard N. , André J. B. , Sperber D. "A mutualistic approach to morality" Behavioral and Brain Sciences (in press)
8. Bloom P. Descartes’ baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human 2004 New York, NY Basic Books
9. Boyer P. And man creates God: Religion explained 2001 New York, NY Basic Books
10. Callan M. , Ellard J. , Nicol J. "The belief in a just world and immanent justice reasoning in adults" Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006 Vol 32 1646
11. Cappelen A. W. , Hole A. D. , Sorensen E. O. , Tungodden B. "The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach" American Economic Review 2007 97 818 827
12. Carlsmith K. , Darley J. , Robinson P. "Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002 Vol 83 284 299
13. Frohlich N. , Oppenheimer J. , Kurki A. "Modeling other-regarding preferences and an experimental test" Public Choice 2004 Vol 119 91 117
14. Guthrie S. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion 1993 New York, NY Oxford University Press
15. Haidt J. , Joseph C. Carruthers P. , Laurence S. , Stich S. "The moral mind: How 5 sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules" The innate mind 2007 Vol volume 3 New York, NY Oxford University Press 367 391
16. Harris P. , Koenig M. "Trust in Testimony: How children learn about science and religion" Child Development 2006 Vol 77 505 524
17. Konow J. "Fair shares: accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions" The American Economic Review 2000 Vol 90 1072 1091
18. Konow J. "Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories" Journal of Economic Literature 2003 Vol XLI 1188 1239
19. Krebs D. Crawford C. , Krebs D. L. "The evolution of moral behaviors" Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications 1998 Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum 337 368
20. Landrine H. , Klonoff E. "Cultural diversity in causal attributions for illness: The role of the supernatural" Journal of Behavioral Medicine 1994 Vol 17 181 193
21. Marshall G. , Swift A. , Routh D. , Burgoyne C. "What is and what ought to be: popular beliefs about distributive justice in thirteen countries" European Sociological Review 1999 Vol 15 349 367
22. Murdock G. P. Theories of illness: a world survey 1980 Pittsburgh, PA University of Pittsburgh Press
23. Piaget J. Le jugement moral chez l’enfant [The moral judgment of the child] 1932 Paris Presses Universitaires de France
24. Shweder R. , Much N. , Mahapatra M. , Park L. Brandt A. , Rozin P. "The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the “big three” explanations of suffering" Morality and health 1997 New York, NY Routledge 119 169
25. Spelke E. S. , Kinzler K. D. "Core knowledge" Developmental Science 2007 Vol 10 89 96
26. Sperber D. Rethinking symbolism 1975 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
27. Sperber D. Gelman S. , Hirschfeld L. "The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations" Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture 1994 Cambridge Cambridge Universiry Press 39 67
28. Sperber D. Explaining culture : a naturalistic approach 1996 Oxford Blackwell
29. Sperber D. , Clément F. , Heintz C. , Mascaro O. , Mercier H. , Origgi G. , Wilson D. "Epistemic vigilance" Mind and Language 2010 Vol 25 4 359 393
30. Sperber D. , Premack D. , Premack A. Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate 1996 New York, NY Oxford University Press
31. Sunstein C. , Schkade D. , Kahneman D. "Do people want optimal deterrence?" Journal of Legal Studies 2000 Vol 29 237 253
32. Thomas R. Moral development theories – secular and religious: A comparative study 1997 Westport, CT Greenwood
33. Trivers R. "Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism" Quarterly Review of Biology 1971 Vol 46 35 57

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation