Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Mnemonic of Intuitive Ontology Violation is Not the Distinctiveness Effect: Evidence From a Broad Age Spectrum of Persons in the UK and China During a Free-Recall Task

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Cognition and Culture

The typical formulation of Pascal Boyer’s counterintuitiveness theory asserts that concepts violating intuitive ontological-category structures are more memorable. However, Boyer’s (2001) original claim centered on the transmission advantages of counter-ontological representations that were cultural. Nevertheless, subsequent studies focused on the recall of novel counterintuitive representations, and an “alternative account” of the memorability of counterintuitive concepts has emerged resembling the distinctiveness effect (Upal, 2010). Yet, experimental evidence shows that familiar concepts have memorability advantages over novel ones (Anaki & Bentin, 2009; Ingram, Mickes, & Wixted, 2011). This investigation of these pan-cultural transmission biases used a large age-representative sample (13–86 years; N = 365) in the UK and China. Results were analyzed by HLM, with familiarity, counterintuitiveness, and delay as 2-level fixed factors, and age as a covariate. No support was revealed for the typical formulation of the hypothesis — however, a significant age effect and interaction of familiarity x counterintuitiveness were found.

Affiliations: 1: School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of OxfordThrive Center for Human Development, Fuller Graduate School of Psychology justin.gregory@anthro.ox.ac.uk ; 2: Thrive Center for Human Development, Fuller Graduate School of Psychology tylergreenway@fuller.edu

10.1163/15685373-12340007
/content/journals/10.1163/15685373-12340007
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685373-12340007
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Anaki D., Bentin S. 2009"Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects" CognitionVol 111 144 149 [Crossref]
2. Baddeley A., Eysenck M. W., Anderson M. C. 2009 Memory New York Psychology Press
3. Banerjee K., Haque O. S., Spelke E. S. 2013"Melting lizards and crying mailboxes: Children’s preferential recall of minimally counterintuitive concepts" Cognitive ScienceVol 37 1 39 [Crossref]
4. Barrett J. L. 2008"Coding and quantifying counterintuitiveness: Theoretical and methodological reflections" Method & Theory in the Study of ReligionVol 20 308 338 [Crossref]
5. Barrett J. L., Nyhof M. A. 2001"Spreading non-natural Concepts: The role of intuitive conceptual structures in memory and transmission of cultural materials" Journal of Cognition & CultureVol 1 69 100 [Crossref]
6. Bloch M. 2005 Essays on cultural transmission New York Berg
7. Boyer P. 1994 The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion Berkeley University of California Press
8. Boyer P. 2001 Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought New York Basic Books
9. Boyer P., Ramble C. 2001"Cognitive templates for religious concepts: Cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive representations" Cognitive ScienceVol 25 535 564 [Crossref]
10. Brimer R. W., Mueller J. H. 1979"Immediate and final recall of pictures and words with written or oral tests" The American Journal of PsychologyVol 93 437 447 [Crossref]
11. Gonce L. O., Upal M. A., Slone D. J.,, Tweney R. D. 2006"Role of context in memory recall of counterintuitive concepts" Journal of Cognition & CultureVol 6 521 547 [Crossref]
12. Green D. M., Swets J. A. 1966 Signal detection theory and psychophysics New York Wiley
13. Gregory J. P., Greenway T. S. 2017"Is there a window of opportunity for religiosity? Children and adolescents preferentially recall religious-type cultural representations, but older adults do not" Religion, Brain & BehaviorVol 7 2 98 116 doi:10.1080/2153599X.2016.1196234 [Crossref]
14. Gregory J. P., Barrett J. L. 2009"Epistemology and counterintuitiveness: Role and relationship in epidemiology of cultural representations" Journal of Cognition and CultureVol 9 289 314 [Crossref]
15. Hall J. F. 1954"Learning as a function of word frequency" The American Journal of PsychologyVol 67 138 140 [Crossref]
16. Hildyard A., Olson D. R. 1982"On the comprehension and memory of oral vs. written discourse" Tannen D. Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy 19 33 Norwood, NJ Ablex
17. Hirshman E., Whelley M. N., Palij M. 1989"An investigation of paradoxical memory effects" Journal of Memory and LanguageVol 28 594 609 [Crossref]
18. Hunt R. 1995"The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did" Psychonomic Bulleting and ReviewVol 2 105 112 [Crossref]
19. Ingram K. M., Mickes L., Wixted J. T. 2011"Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and CognitionVol 38 325 339 [Crossref]
20. Johnson C. V. M., Kelly S. W., Bishop P. 2010"Measuring the mnemonic advantage of counter intuitive and counter schematic concepts" Journal of Cognition and CultureVol 10 111 123 [Crossref]
21. Keil F. C. 1979 Semantic and conceptual development: An ontological perspective Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press [Crossref]
22. Legare C. H., Zhu L.,, Wellman H. M. 2013"Examining biological explanations in Chinese preschool children: A cross-cultural comparison" Journal of Cognition and CultureVol 13 67 93 [Crossref]
23. Nairne J. S., VanArrsdall J. E., Panderiada J. N. S., Cogdill M., LeBreton J. M. 2013"Adaptive memory: The mnemonic value of animacy" Psychological ScienceVol 24 2099 2105 [Crossref]
24. Nisbett R. E. 2003 The geography of thought New York Free Press
25. Nisbett R. E., Peng K., Choi C., Norenzayan A. 2001"Culture and thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition" Psychological ReviewVol 108 291 310 [Crossref]
26. Norenzayan A., Atran S., Faulkner J., Schaller M. 2006"Memory and mystery: The cultural selection of minimally counterintuitive narratives" Cognitive ScienceVol 30 531 553 [Crossref]
27. Schmidt S. R. 1985 "Encoding and retrieval processes in the memory of conceptually distinctive events" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and CognitionVol 11 565 578 [Crossref]
28. Spelke E. S. 1991"Physical knowledge in infancy: Reflections on Piaget’s theory" Carey S., Gelman R. Epigenesis of mind: Studies in biology and cognition 133 170 Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum
29. Sperber D. 1996 Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach Oxford Blackwell
30. Sumby W. H. 1963"Word frequency and serial position effects" Journal of Oral Learning and Oral BehaviorVol 1 443 450
31. Surprenant A. M., Neath I. 2009 Principles of memory New York Psychology Press
32. Upal M. A. 2010 "An alternative account of the minimal counterintuitiveness effect" Cognitive Systems Research Vol 11 194 203 [Crossref]
33. Waddill P. J., McDaniel M. A. 1998"Distinctiveness effects in recall: Differential processing or privileged retrieval?" Memory and Cognition Vol 26 108 120 [Crossref]
34. Wang Q. 2004"The emergence of cultural self-construct: Autobiographical memory and self-description in American and Chinese children" Developmental PsychologyVol 40 3 15 [Crossref]
35. Wellman H. M., Cross D., Watson J. 2001"Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief" Child DevelopmentVol 72 655 684 [Crossref]
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685373-12340007
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685373-12340007
2017-10-06
2018-08-18

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Journal of Cognition and Culture — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation