Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Analogical Retrieval of Folktales: A Cross-Cultural Approach

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Cognition and Culture

This cross-cultural study addressed how individuals retrieve and transfer naturally learned information (i.e., folktales) from long-term memory by analogy with a previously unencountered story, concept, or problem. American and Iranian participants read target stories constructed to be analogous to folktales either familiar or unfamiliar to their culture, all having high structural familiarity and either high or low surface similarity to the source folktales. Participants reported whether targets (analogues) reminded them of any specific folktale they had learned in the past; positive responses plus additional justification (i.e., the folktale’s name or its gist) were interpreted as successful analogical retrievals. The current experiment demonstrated a high overall rate of analogical retrieval for familiar folktales and essentially no retrieval for unfamiliar folktales. There was also reliably more retrieval for analogue stories having higher versus lower surface similarity to target folktales. The high salience of surface similarity was also revealed when participants rated retrieved folktales for similarity to the target. Personal familiarity with folktales increased the retrieval rate, but presenting the folktale’s name as a cue produced mixed effects on retrieval. In summary, individuals readily retrieved culturally familiar folktales from long-term memory when they encountered structurally similar analogues, but retrieval was modulated by surface similarity.

Affiliations: 1: University of California, Davis ; 2: University of California, Davis zhechen@ucdavis.edu

10.1163/15685373-12340008
/content/journals/10.1163/15685373-12340008
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685373-12340008
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Barnett S. M., Ceci S. J. 2002"When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer" Psychological BulletinVol 128 4 612 637 [Crossref]
2. Bassok M. 2001"Semantic alignments in mathematical word problems" Gentner D., Holyoak K. J., Kokinov B. N. The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science 401 433 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
3. Blanchette I., Dunbar K. 1997"Constraints underlying analogy use in a real-world context: Politics" Shafto M. G., Langley P. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 867 Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum
4. Bransford J. D., Brown A. L., Cocking R. R. 1999 How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School Washington, DC National Academy Press
5. Brown A. L., Kane M. J., Echols C. H. 1986"Young children’s mental models determine analogical transfer across problems with a common goal structure" Cognitive DevelopmentVol 1 103 121 [Crossref]
6. Catrambone R. 1996"Generalizing solution procedures learned from examples" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and CognitionVol 22 1020 1031 [Crossref]
7. Catrambone R. 2002"The effects of surface and structural feature matches on the access of story analogs" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and CognitionVol 28 318 334 [Crossref]
8. Catrambone R., Craig D. L., Nersessian N. J. 2006"The role of perceptually represented structure in analogical problem solving" Memory & CognitionVol 34 5 1126 1132 [Crossref]
9. Chen Z. 2003"Worth one thousand words: Children’s use of pictures in analogical problem solving" Journal of Cognitive DevelopmentVol 4 415 434 [Crossref]
10. Chen Z., Mo L., Honomichl R. 2004"Having the memory of an elephant: Long-term retrieval and the use of analogues in problem solving" Journal of Experimental Psychology: GeneralVol 133 415 433 [Crossref]
11. Clement C. A., Gentner D. 1991"Systematicity as a selectional constraint in analogical mapping" Cognitive ScienceVol 15 89 132 [Crossref]
12. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt 1997 The Jasper Project: Lessons in Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Professional Development Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum
13. Dehghani M., Gentner D., Forbus K., Ekhtiari H., Sachdeva S. 2009"Analogy and moral decision making" Kokinov B., Holyoak K., Gentner D. New frontiers in analogy research: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Analogy 168 177 Sofia, Bulgaria NBU Press
14. Detterman D. K., Sternberg R. J. 1993 Transfer on trial: Intelligence, Cognition, and Instruction Norwood, NJ Ablex
15. Dunbar K. 1995"How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories" Sternberg R. J., Davidson J. The Nature of Insight 365 395 Cambridge MA MIT Press
16. Dunbar K. 1997"How scientists think: Online creativity and conceptual change in science" Ward T. B., Smith S. M., Vaid S. Conceptual Structures and Processes: Emergence, Discovery and Change 461 493 APA Press Washington DC
17. Dunbar K. 2001"The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings, yet so difficult in the psychology laboratory" Gentner D., Holyoak K. J., Kokinov B. N. The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science 313 334 Cambridge, MA MIT press
18. Dunbar K., Blanchette I. 2001"The invivo/invitro approach to cognition: the case of analogy" Trends in Cognitive SciencesVol 5 334 339 [Crossref]
19. Forbus K., Gentner D., Law K. 1994"mac/fac: A model of similarity-based retrieval" Cognitive ScienceVol 19 141 205 [Crossref]
20. Gentner D. 1983"Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy" Cognitive ScienceVol 7 155 170 [Crossref]
21. Gentner D. 1989"Mechanisms of analogical learning" Vosniadou S., Ortony A. Similarity and analogical reasoning 199 241 London Cambridge University Press [Crossref]
22. Gentner D., Markman A. B. 1997"Structure-mapping in analogy and similarity" American PsychologistVol 52 45 56 [Crossref]
23. Gentner D., Rattermann M. J., Forbus K. D. 1993"The role of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness" Cognitive PsychologyVol 25 524 575 [Crossref]
24. Gentner D., Toupin C. 1986"Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy" Cognitive ScienceVol 10 277 300 [Crossref]
25. Gick M. L., Holyoak K. J. 1980"Analogical problem solving" Cognitive PsychologyVol 12 306 355 [Crossref]
26. Goswami U. 1996"Analogical reasoning and cognitive development"In: Reese H. Advances in Child Development and Behavior 92 135 San Diego, CA Academic Press
27. Halford G. S. 1993 Children’s Understanding: The Development of Mental Models Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum
28. Hammond K. J., Seifert C. M., Gray K. C. 1991"Functionality in analogical transfer: A hard match is good to find" Journal of Learning SciencesVol 1 111 152 [Crossref]
29. Holyoak K. J. 2005"Analogy" Holyoak K. J., Morrison R. G. The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning 117 142 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press
30. Holyoak K. J., Koh K. 1987"Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer" Memory & CognitionVol 15 332 340 [Crossref]
31. Keane M. T. 1987"On retrieving analogues when solving problems" Quarterly Journal of Experimental PsychologyVol 39A 29 41 [Crossref]
32. Keane M. T., Ledgeway T., Duff S. 1994"Constraints on analogical mapping: A comparison of three models" Cognitive ScienceVol 18 387 438 [Crossref]
33. Klahr D., Chen Z. 2011"Finding one’s place in transfer space" Child Development PerspectivesVol 5 196 204 [Crossref]
34. Lave J. 1988 Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life Cambridge, England Cambridge University Press [Crossref]
35. Loewenstein J., Thompson L., Gentner D. 1999"Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation" Psychological Bulletin ReviewVol 6 586 597 [Crossref]
36. Moscovitch M., Rosenbaum R. S., Gilboa A., Addis D. R., Westmacott R., Grady C., Nadel L. 2005"Functional neuroanatomy of remote episodic, semantic, and spatial memory: a unified account based on multiple trace theory" Journal of AnatomyVol 207 35 66 [Crossref]
37. Nisbett R. E., Peng K., Choi I., Norenzayan A. 2001"Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition" Psychological ReviewVol 108 291 310 [Crossref]
38. Novick L. R. 1988"Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and CognitionVol 14 510 520 [Crossref]
39. Perkins D. N., Grotzer T. A. 1997"Teaching intelligence" American PsychologistVol 52 1125 1133 [Crossref]
40. Read S. J., Cesa L. 1991"This reminds me of the time when…: Expectation failures in reminding and explanation" Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyVol 27 1 25 [Crossref]
41. Reeves L.M., Weisberg R. W. 1994"The role of content and abstract information in analogical transfer" Psychological BulletinVol 115 381 400 [Crossref]
42. Rogoff B. 2003 The Cultural Nature of Human Development New York Oxford University Press
43. Ross B. H. 1984"Reminding and their effects in learning a cognitive skill" Journal of Cognitive PsychologyVol 16 371 416 [Crossref]
44. Ross B. H. 1989"Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and CognitionVol 15 456 468 [Crossref]
45. Siegler R. S. 2000"The rebirth of children’s learning" Child DevelopmentVol 71 26 35 [Crossref]
46. Singley M. K., Anderson J. R. 1989 Transfer of Cognitive Skill Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.
47. Thorndike E. L., Woodworth R. S. 1901"The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficacy of other functions" Psychological ReviewVol 8 247 261 [Crossref]
48. Tomasello M. 2001"Perceiving intention and learning words in the second year of life"In: Bowerman M., Levinson S. C. Language Development and Conceptual Development 132 158 New York Cambridge University Press
49. Weisberg R. W., DiCamillo M., Phillips D. 1978"Transferring old associations to new problems: A nonautomatic process" Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal BehaviorVol 17 219 228 [Crossref]
50. Wharton C. M., Holyoak K. J., Downing P. E., Lange T. E., Wickens T. D., Melz E. R. 1994"Below the surface: Analogical similarity and retrieval competition in reminding" Cognitive PsychologyVol 26 64 101 [Crossref]
51. Wharton C. M., Holyoak K. J., Lange T. E. 1996"Remote analogical reminding" Memory & CognitionVol 24 629 643 [Crossref]
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685373-12340008
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685373-12340008
2017-10-06
2018-08-21

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Journal of Cognition and Culture — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation