Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Rhythms of Discontent: Synchrony Impedes Performance and Group Functioning in an Interdependent Coordination Task

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Cognition and Culture

Synchrony — intentional, rhythmic motor entrainment in groups — is an important topic in social psychology and the cognitive science of religion. Synchrony has been found to increase trust and prosociality, to index interpersonal attention, and to induce perceptions of similarity and group cohesion. Causal explanations suggest that synchrony induces neurocognitive self-other blurring, leading participants to process one another as identical. In light of such findings, researchers have highlighted synchrony as an important evolved tool for establishing and maintaining collective identity in human groups, particularly within ritual and religious contexts. However, many aspects of group life require coordination rather than mere prosocial cooperation. In coordinative contexts, interpersonal relations and motor sequences are often complementary rather than identical, and leadership hierarchies streamline group decisions. It is thus unclear whether synchrony would benefit or hamper group outcomes in contexts requiring complex interdependent coordination and hierarchy. In a two-condition experimental paradigm, we tested the effects of synchrony on the outcomes of a three-person, complex verbal coordination task. Groups in the synchrony condition performed more poorly on the coordination exercise and reported higher levels of conflict as well as lower levels of group cohesion and similarity. We interpret these results as indicating boundary conditions on the prosocial effects of synchrony: in settings that require complex, interdependent social coordination, the self-other blurring induced by synchrony is situationally inappropriate. These findings dovetail with the anthropological observation that real-world ritual is often focused on establishing and reinforcing social distinctions rather than social unison.

Affiliations: 1: Center for Mind and CultureBoston University School of Theology ; 2: Boston University Department of Psychology


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Bell C. M. 1992 Ritual theory, ritual practice New York, NY Oxford University Press
2. Bendersky C., Hays N. A. 2012"Status conflict in groups" Organization ScienceVol 23 2 323 340 [Crossref]
3. Boehm C. 1999 Hierarchy in the forest: The evolution of egalitarian behavior Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
4. Bulbulia J. 2012"Spreading order: religion, cooperative niche construction, and risky coordination problems" Biology & PhilosophyVol 27 1 1 27 [Crossref]
5. Cohen E. E. A., Ejsmond-Frey R., Knight N., Dunbar R. I. M. 2010"Rowers’ high: Behavioural synchrony is correlated with elevated pain thresholds" Biology LettersVol 6 1 106 108 [Crossref]
6. Dale R., Fusaroli R., Haakonsson D. D., Healey P., Mønster D., McGraw J. J., Tylén K. 2013"Beyond Synchrony: Complementarity and Asynchrony in Joint Action" Presented at the Cognitive Science Society Berlin, Germany
7. Dryer C. D., Horowitz L. M. 1997"When do opposites attract? Interpersonal complementarity versus similarity" Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyVol 72 3 592 603 [Crossref]
8. Durkheim É. 1912 The elementary forms of religious life Cladis M. S. Cosman C. Oxford, England Oxford University Press
9. Ehrenreich B. 2006 Dancing in the streets: A history of collective joy New York, NY Holt Paperbacks
10. Fine J. M., Likens A. D., Amazeen E. L., Amazeen P. G. 2015"Emergent Complexity Matching in Interpersonal Coordination: Local Dynamics and Global Variability" Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & PerformanceVol 41 3 723 737 [Crossref]
11. Fischer R., Callander R., Reddish P., Bulbulia J. 2013"How do rituals affect cooperation?" Human NatureVol 24 2 115 125 [Crossref]
12. Fiske A. P. 1991 Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations New York, NY Free Press
13. Freeman W. J. 1995 Societies of Brains: A Study in the Neuroscience of Love and Hate Psychology Press
14. Fusaroli R., Tylén K. 2016"Investigating Conversational Dynamics: Interactive Alignment, Interpersonal Synergy, and Collective Task Performance" Cognitive ScienceVol 40 1 145 171 [Crossref]
15. Galinsky A. D., Gruenfeld D. H., Magee J. C. 2003"From power to action" Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyVol 85 3 453 466 [Crossref]
16. Haidt J. 2012 The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion New York, NY Pantheon
17. Haidt J., Seder J., Kesebir S. 2008"Hive psychology, happiness, and public policy" Journal of Legal StudiesVol 37 3 Retrieved from
18. Halevy N., Chou E. Y., Galinsky A. D. 2011"A functional model of hierarchy Why, how, and when vertical differentiation enhances group performance" Organizational Psychology ReviewVol 1 1 32 52 [Crossref]
19. Hove M. J. 2008"Shared circuits, shared time, and interpersonal synchrony" Behavioral and Brain SciencesVol 31 01 29 30 [Crossref]
20. Jehn K. A. 1995"A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict" Administrative Science QuarterlyVol 40 2 256 282 [Crossref]
21. Ji L.-J., Zhang Z., Nisbett R. E. 2004"Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization" Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyVol 87 1 57 65 [Crossref]
22. Josephs R. A., Sellers J. G., Newman M. L., Mehta P. H. 2006"The mismatch effect: When testosterone and status are at odds" Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyVol 90 6 999 1013 [Crossref]
23. Kilduff G. J., Willer R., Anderson C. 2016"Hierarchy and Its Discontents: Status Disagreement Leads to Withdrawal of Contribution and Lower Group Performance" Organization ScienceVol 27 2 373 390 [Crossref]
24. King A. J., Johnson D. D. P., Van Vugt M. 2009"The origins and evolution of leadership" Current Biology: CBVol 19 19 R911 R916 [Crossref]
25. Kokal I., Engel A., Kirschner S., Keysers C. 2011"Synchronized drumming enhances activity in the caudate and facilitates prosocial commitment — if the rhythm comes easily" PloS OneVol 6 11 e27272 [Crossref]
26. Konvalinka I., Vuust P., Roepstorff A., Frith C. D. 2010"Follow you, follow me: Continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping" The Quarterly Journal of Experimental PsychologyVol 63 11 2220 2230 [Crossref]
27. Lakens D. 2010"Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity" Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyVol 46 5 701 708 [Crossref]
28. Lakens D. 2011"If they move in sync, they must feel in sync: Movement synchrony leads to attributions of rapport and entitativity" Social CognitionVol 29 1 1 14 [Crossref]
29. Lang M., Shaw D. J., Reddish P., Wallot S., Mitkidis P., Xygalatas D. 2015"Lost in the Rhythm: Effects of Rhythm on Subsequent Interpersonal Coordination" Cognitive Science
30. Launay J., Dean R. T., Bailes F. 2013"Synchronization can influence trust following virtual interaction" Experimental PsychologyVol 60 1 53 63 [Crossref]
31. Lumsden J., Miles L. K., Macrae C. N. 2014"Sync or sink? Interpersonal synchrony impacts self-esteem" Frontiers in PsychologyVol 5 1064 [Crossref]
32. Mazur A. 2005 Biosociology of dominance and deference Lanham, MD Rowman & Littlefield
33. McNeill W. H. 1995 Keeping together in time: Dance and drill In human history Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
34. Miles L. K., Nind L. K., Macrae C. N. 2009"The rhythm of rapport: Interpersonal synchrony and social perception" Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyVol 45 3 585 589 [Crossref]
35. Miyamoto Y., Ji L.-J. 2011"Power fosters context-independent, analytic cognition" Personality and Social Psychology BulletinVol 37 11 1449 1458 [Crossref]
36. Olson M. 1965 The Logic of Collective Action Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
37. Rappaport R. A. 1999 Ritual and religion in the making of humanity Cambridge; New York, NY Cambridge University Press [Crossref]
38. Reddish P., Bulbulia J., Fischer R. 2014"Does synchrony promote generalized prosociality?" Religion, Brain & BehaviorVol 4 1 3 19 [Crossref]
39. Reddish P., Fischer R., Bulbulia J. 2013"Let’s dance together: Synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation" PloS OneVol 8 8 e71182 [Crossref]
40. Richardson M. J., Marsh K. L., Isenhower R. W., Goodman J. R. L., Schmidt R. C. 2007"Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination" Human Movement ScienceVol 26 6 867 891 [Crossref]
41. Ronay R., Greenaway K., Anicich E. M., Galinsky A. D. 2012"The path to glory Is paved with hierarchy: When hierarchical differentiation increases group effectiveness" Psychological ScienceVol 23 6 669 677 [Crossref]
42. Ronay Richard 2014"Advice: A group collaboration task"
43. Schüler S. 2011 Religion, Kognition, Evolution: Eine Religionswissenschaftliche Auseinandersetzung mit der Cognitive Science of Religion Stuttgart Kohlhammer
44. Simpson B., Willer R., Ridgeway C. L. 2012"Status Hierarchies and the Organization of Collective Action" Sociological TheoryVol 30 3 149 166 [Crossref]
45. Smith J. Z. 1992 To take place: Toward theory in ritual Reprint edition Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press
46. Tarr B., Launay J., Cohen E., Dunbar R. 2015"Synchrony and exertion during dance independently raise pain threshold and encourage social bonding" Biology LettersVol 11 10 20150767 [Crossref]
47. Tarr B., Launay J., Dunbar R. I. M. 2014"Music and social bonding: “Self-other” merging and neurohormonal mechanisms" Frontiers in PsychologyVol 5 [Crossref]
48. Tiedens L. Z., Fragale A. R. 2003"Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior" Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyVol 84 3 558 568 [Crossref]
49. Tiedens L. Z., Unzueta M. M., Young M. J. 2007"An unconscious desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners" Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyVol 93 3 402 414 [Crossref]
50. Tognoli E., Lagarde J., DeGuzman G. C., Kelso J. A. S. 2007"The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination" Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol 104 19 8190 8195 [Crossref]
51. U.S. Army 2003"Drill and ceremonies U.S. Army field manual 3.21.5" Department of the Army
52. Valdesolo P., DeSteno D. 2011"Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion" EmotionVol 11 2 262 266 [Crossref]
53. Valdesolo P., Ouyang J., DeSteno D. 2010"The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability" Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyVol 46 4 693 695 [Crossref]
54. Van Vugt M. 2006"Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership" Personality and Social Psychology ReviewVol 10 4 354 371 [Crossref]
55. Willer R. 2009"Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem" American Sociological ReviewVol 74 1 23 43 [Crossref]
56. Wiltermuth S. S., Heath C. 2009"Synchrony and cooperation" Psychological ScienceVol 20 1 1 5 [Crossref]

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Journal of Cognition and Culture — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation