Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Is Religion Essential? Beliefs about Religious Categories

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Cognition and Culture

AbstractThe purpose of the present study was to assess whether presumed variations in people’s values towards intergroup mobility modulate their essentialist beliefs about the groups. Our target population was orthodox Jews, who, on the one hand, value in-group preservation regarding religious affiliation (Jewish or Christian), but on the other, value uni-directional integration regarding religiosity (from secular to orthodox). This population was compared to secular Jews, who do not hold such differential values. Participants were given four different transformation scenarios - addressing both biological and genetic aspects of essentialism - and were asked to rate to what extent the different transformations would change a person’s social group membership. Results showed that orthodox participants were more likely than secular participants to respond that people cannot change their religious affiliation. Moreover, orthodox participants considered it more plausible that a secular Jew would become an orthodox Jew, than that an orthodox Jew would become a secular Jew. Secular participants did not manifest such an asymmetry. The implications of these findings to social essentialism are discussed.

Affiliations: 1: * Corresponding author, Email: mishelsegev@gmail.com

10.1163/15685373-12342078
/content/journals/10.1163/15685373-12342078
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685373-12342078
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685373-12342078
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685373-12342078
2012-01-01
2016-12-09

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Journal of Cognition and Culture — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation