Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Using Geometrical Representations as Cognitive Technologies

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

In this article we provide a treatment of geometric diagrams as a semiotic ‘technology’ in mathematics education. To this end, we review two classroom observations and one experimental study that illuminate the potential for communicative breakdown in the use of this technology, as well as possibilities for mitigating the breakdown. In the classroom observations, we show that rather than ‘seeing through’ the diagrams to the idealized mathematical objects (a pervasive semiotic practice in academic mathematics), upper-elementary grade students may treat the misleading appearances of the diagrams as mathematically significant. We argue that one source of such communicative breakdowns is that the ‘rules’ for using the semiotic technology are rarely made explicit in classrooms. In the experimental study, we review findings showing that when students’ have access to mathematical definitions that distinguish between the diagram and the idealized mathematical object (e.g., a diagram of a mathematical point is the size of a small dot, but a true mathematical point has no size), they are less likely to rely on the misleading appearances of the diagrams; we also found that this effect increases over grade level. The issues explored in this article suggest that upper elementary students could benefit from explicit treatment of definitional practices in academic mathematics. At a broader theoretical level, the findings serve to emphasize the potential for any semiotic technology to have multiple meanings and the role of active sense making in communications with and about technologies.

Affiliations: 1: * Graduate School of Education1501 Tolman HallUniversity of California BerkeleyBerkeley, ca 94720-1670USA; 2: Graduate School of Education1501 Tolman HallUniversity of California BerkeleyBerkeley, ca 94720-1670USA


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. de Kirby K. , Saxe G. B. "Idealized objects and material diagrams: Definition use in early geometrical problem solving" 2013 UC Berkeley, Berkeley CA Unpublished manuscript
2. Dörfler W. Cobb P. , Yackel E. , McClain K. "Means for meaning" Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms; Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design 2000 Mahwah NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 99 131
3. Fischbein E. "The theory of figural concepts" Educational Studies in Mathematics 1993 Vol 24 139 162
4. Font V. , Contreras Á. "The problem of the particular and its relation to the general in mathematics education" Educational Studies in Mathematics 2008 Vol 69 33 52
5. Goodnow J. J. , Miller P. J. , Kessel F. Cultural practices as contexts for development 1995 San Francisco CA. Jossey-Bass
6. Lave J. , Wenger E. Situated learning 1991 New York NY. Cambridge University Press
7. Mesquita A. L. "On conceptual obstacles linked with external representation in geometry" The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 1998 Vol 17 183 195
8. Peirce C. S. "On the algebra of logic: A contribution to the philosophy of notation" American Journal of Mathematics 1885 Vol 7 180 196
9. Radford L. "The seen, the spoken and the written: A semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge" For the Learning of Mathematics 2002 Vol 22 14 23
10. Rogoff B. Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context 1990 New York NY. Oxford University Press
11. Rogoff B. The cultural nature of human development 2003 Oxford Oxford University Press
12. Saxe G. B. Culture and cognitive development: Studies in mathematical understanding 1991 Hillsdale NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
13. Saxe G. B. Demetriou A. , Raftopoulos A. "Practices of quantification from a socio-cultural perspective" Cognitive Developmental Change: Theories, Models and Measurement 2004 New York NY. Cambridge University Press 241 263
14. Saxe G. B. Cultural development of mathematical ideas: Papua New Guinea studies 2012 New York NY. Cambridge University Press
15. Saxe G. B. , Guberman S. R. , Gearhart M. "Social processes in early number development" Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1987 Vol 52 Ann Arbor MI. Society for Research in Child Development Serial No. 162
16. Scribner S. , Cole M. The psychology of literacy 1981 Cambridge MA. Harvard University Press
17. Sfard A. Cobb P. , Yackel E. , McClain K. "Symbolizing mathematical reality into being – or how mathematical discourse and mathematical objects create each other" Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design 2000 Mahwah NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 37 98

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Journal of Cognition and Culture — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation