A Cross-Cultural Comparison of American and Japanese Experiences of Personal and Vicarious Shame
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on
BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an
institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform
automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the
Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a
favorably uniform low price.
The purpose of this study was to examine cultural influences on shame. In particular, the focus was to assess the influence of the following factors on the object of shame (specifically, personal vs. vicarious shame): (1) the effect of individualism/collectivism, measured by a widely used standardized measurement; (2) the role of tightness/looseness (based on ecological factors); and (3) the patterns of within- and between-cultural differences and similarities. Data were collected from two American and two Japanese universities to test within- and between-cultural influences on the object of shame. Participants were asked to describe and rate three autobiographical experiences of shame, with each successive request being increasingly specific in asking for shame about something for which the participant did not feel responsible. Cultural differences in tightness and looseness, both within and between the two nations, were predictive of the likelihood that participants would report vicarious shame. In contrast, standard measures of individualism-collectivism did not predict these differences. These findings suggest that culture affects the object of shame. However, in contrast to our hypothesis, attitudinal measures of individualism/collectivism were not a significant predictor. Rather, tightness/looseness determined by ecological factors was the better predictor of some cultural differences on the object of shame. Furthermore, these findings imply that attitudinal measures of individualism/collectivism may not agree with ecological measures, and that including multiple samples from each language/nation effectively reduces the confound between culture and language.
Affiliations:
1: Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University1001 Spencer W. Kimball Tower, Provo, ut 84602USA;
2: Department of Psychology, Georgetown University306N White-Gravenor Hall, 37th and O Streets, n.w., Washington, dc 20057USA
1. BedfordO. , HwangK. "Guilt and shame in Chinese culture: A cross-cultural framework from the perspective of morality and identity." Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour2003 Vol 33 127144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00210
2. BondM. H. "Reclaiming the individual from Hofstede’s ecological analysis – A 20-year odyssey: comment on Oyserman et al. (2002)." Psychological Bulletin2002 Vol 128 7377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.73
3. CarpenterS. "Effects of cultural tightness and collectivism on self-concept and causal attributions." Cross-Cultural Research2000 Vol 34 3856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106939710003400103
4. CrystalD. S. , ParrottW. G. , OkazakiY. , WatanabeH. "Examining relations between shame and personality among university students in the United States and Japan: A developmental perspective." International Journal of Behavioral Development2001 Vol 25 113123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01650250042000177
5. De RiveraJ. "Comparing experiences across cultures: Shame and guilt in American and Japanese." Hiroshima Forum for Psychology1989 Vol 14 1320
6. DolanR. E. , WordenR. L.Japan: A country study1992Washington, DCFederal Research Division, Library of Congress(Electronic version)
7. EmberC. R. , EmberM.Anthropology19854th edn.Englewood Cliffs, NJPrentice Hall
8. FesslerD. M. T. "Shame in two cultures: Implications for evolutionary approaches." Journal of Cognition and Culture2004 Vol 4 207262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568537041725097
9. FiskeA. P. "Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures – A critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002)" Psychological Bulletin2002 Vol 128 7888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.78
10. FontaineJ. R. J., et al "Untying the Gordian know of guilt and shame: The structure of guilt and shame reactions based on situation and person variation in Belgium, Hungary, and Peru." Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology2006 Vol 37 273292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022105284493
11. HeineS. J. , LehmanD. R. , PengK. , GreenholtzJ. "What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert Scales?: The reference-group effect." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology2002 Vol 82 903918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.903
12. HofsteadG.Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values1980Beverly Hills, CASage
13. Hurtado de MendozaA. , Fernández-DolsJ. M. , ParrottW. G. , CarreraP. "Emotion terms, category structure, and the problem of translation: The case of shameand vergüenza." Cognition and Emotion2010 Vol 24 661680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930902958255
14. KitayamaS. "Culture and basic psychological process – toward a system view of culture: comment on Oyserman et al. (2002)." Psychological Bulletin2002 Vol 128 8996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.89
15. KeltnerD. , HarkerL.GilbertP. , AndrewsB. "The forms and functions of the nonverbal signal of shame." Shame: Interpersonal behavior, psychopathology, and culture1998New York, NYOxford University Press7898
16. LebraT. S. "Shame and Guilt: A psychocultural view of the Japanese self." Ethos1993 Vol 1 192209
17. LewisH. B.Shame and guilt in neurosis.1971New York, NYInternational Universities Press
20. Lindsay-HartzJ. , de RiveraJ. , MascoloM.TangneyJ. P. , FisherK. W. "Differentiating shame and guilt and their effects on motivation." Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride1995New York, NYGuilford274300
21. MarkusH. A. , KitayamaS.KitayamaS. , MarkusH. A. "The cultural construction of the self and emotion: Implications for social behavior." Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence1994Washington, DCAmerican Psychological Association89130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10152-003
23. MesquitaB. , KarasawaM. "Self-conscious emotions as dynamic cultural processes." Psychological Inquiry2004 Vol 15 161166
24. OysermanD. , CoonH. M. , KemmelmeierM. "Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses." Psychological Bulletin2002 Vol 128 372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
25. SchwartzS. H.KimU. , TriandisH. C. , KagitcibasiC. , ChiS. C. , YoonG. "Beyond individualism and collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values." Individualism and collectivism: Theory method and applications1994Newbury Park, CASage85122
26. SegallM. H. , DasenP. R. , BerryJ. W. , PoortingaY. H.Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to cross-cultural psychology.1999Boston, MAAllyn and Bacon
28. SingelisT. M. , TriandisH. C. , BhawukD. P. S. , GelfandM. J. "Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement." Cross-Cultural Research1995 Vol 29 240275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106939719502900302
29. SmithR. S. , WebsterJ. M. , ParrottW. G. , EyreH. L. "The role of public exposure in moral and nonmoral shame and guilt." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology2002 Vol 83 138159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.138
30. StipekD. "Differences between Americans and Chinese in the circumstances evoking pride, shame, and guilt." Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology1998 Vol 29 616629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022198295002
31. SpackmanM. P. , ParrottW. G. "Emotionology in prose a study of descriptions of emotion from three literary periods." Cognition and Emotion2001 Vol 15 553574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930126135
32. TakahashiK. , OharaN. , AntonucciT. C. "Commonalities and differences in close relationships among the Americans and Japanese: A comparison by the individualism/collectivism concept." International Journal of Behavioral Development2003 Vol 26 453465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01650250143000418
34. TangneyJ. P. , WagnerP. , GramzowR.The test of self-conscious affect.1989Fairfax, VAGeorge Mason University
35. TangneyJ. P. , MillerR. S. , FlickerL. , BarlowD. H. "Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions?" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology1996 Vol 70 12561269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1256
36. TracyJ. L. , RobinsR. W. "Appraisal antecedents of shame and guilt: Support for a theoretical model." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin2006 Vol 32 13391351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167206290212
37. TriandisH. C.Culture and Social Behavior.1994New York, NYMcGraw-Hill
38. TriandisH. C.Individualism and Collectivism.1995Boulder, COWestview Press
40. TriandisH. C. , GelfandM. J. "Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology1998 Vol 74 118128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118
41. VandelloJ. A. , CohenD. "Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology1999 Vol 77 279292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.279
42. WongY. , TsaiJ.TracyJ. L. , RobinsR. W. , TangneyJ. P. "Cultural models of shame and guilt." The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research2007New York, NYGuilford209223
43. YamawakiN. "Differences between Japanese and American college students in giving advice about help seeking to rape victims." Journal of Social Psychology2007 Vol 147 511530 http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.5.511-530