Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

A (Simple) Experimental Demonstration that Cultural Evolution is not Replicative, but Reconstructive — and an Explanation of Why this Difference Matters

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Cognition and Culture

Two complementary approaches to a naturalistic theory of culture are, on the one hand, mainstream cultural evolution research, and, on the other, work done under the banners of cultural attraction and the epidemiology of representations. There is much agreement between these two schools of thought, including in particular a commitment to population thinking. Both schools also acknowledge that the propagation of culture is not simply a matter of replication, but rather one of reconstruction. However, the two schools of thought differ on the relative importance of this point. The cultural attraction school believes it to be fundamental to genuinely causal explanations of culture. In contrast, most mainstream cultural evolution thinking abstracts away from it. In this paper I make flesh a simple thought experiment (first proposed by Dan Sperber) that directly contrasts the effects that replication and reconstruction have on cultural items. Results demonstrate, in a simple and graphic way, that (i) normal cultural propagation is not replicative, but reconstructive, and (ii) that these two different modes of propagation afford two qualitatively different explanations of stability. If propagation is replicative, as it is in biology, then stability arises from the fidelity of that replication, and hence an explanation of stability comes from an explanation of how and why this high-fidelity is achieved. If, on the other hand, propagation is reconstructive (as it is in culture), then stability arises from the fact that a subclass of cultural types are easily re-producible, while others are not, and hence an explanation of stability comes from a description of what types are easily re-producible, and an explanation of why they are. I discuss two implications of this result for research at the intersection of evolution, cognition, and culture.

Affiliations: 1: Evolutionary Anthropology Research Group, Department of Anthropology, Durham University Dawson Building, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LEUK


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Acerbi A., Mesoudi A."If we are all cultural Darwinians what’s the fuss about? Clarifying recent disagreements in the field of cultural evolution" Biology and Philosophy 2015Vol 30 481 503 [Crossref]
2. Atran S."The trouble with memes" Human Nature 2001Vol 12 351 381 [Crossref]
3. Boudry M., Blancke S., Pigliucci M."What makes weird beliefs thrive? The epidemiology of pseudoscience" Philosophical Psychology 2015Vol 28 1177 1198 [Crossref]
4. Boyd R., Richerson P. Culture and the Evolutionary Process 1985 Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press
5. Boyer P."Cognitive tracks of cultural inheritance: How evolved intuitive ontology governs cultural transmission" American Anthropologist 1998Vol 100 876 889 [Crossref]
6. Boyer P., Petersen M."The naturalness of (many) social institutions: Evolved cognition as their foundation" Journal of Institutional Economics 2012Vol 8 1 25 [Crossref]
7. Christiansen M. H., Chater N."Language as shaped by the brain" Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2008Vol 31 489 509
8. Claidière N., André J. B."The transmission of genes and culture: A questionable analogy" Evolutionary Biology 2012Vol 39 1 12 24 [Crossref]
9. Claidière N., Sperber D."The role of attraction in cultural evolution" Journal of Cognition and Culture 2007Vol 7 89 111 [Crossref]
10. Claidière N., Sperber D."Imitation explains the propagation, not the stability of animal culture" Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 2009Vol 277 651 659 [Crossref]
11. Claidière N., Scott-Phillips T.C., Sperber D."How Darwinian is cultural evolution?" Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 2014Vol 369 20130368 [Crossref]
12. Griffiths T.L., Kalish M. L., Lewandowsky S."Theoretical and empirical evidence for the impact of inductive biases on cultural evolution" Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series B: Biological Sciences 2008Vol 363 3503 3514 [Crossref]
13. Guglielmino C.R., Viganotti C., Hewlett B., Cavalli-Sforza L.L."Cultural variation in Africa: Role of mechanisms of transmission and adaptation" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1995Vol 92 7585 7589 [Crossref]
14. Henrich J., Boyd R."On modeling cognition and culture: Why cultural evolution does not require replication of representations" Journal of Cognition and Culture 2002Vol 2 87 112 [Crossref]
15. Henrich J., Boyd R., Richerson P."Five misunderstandings about cultural evolution" Human Nature 2008Vol 19 119 137 [Crossref]
16. Kalish M.L., Griffiths T.L., Lewandowsky S."Iterated learning: Intergenerational knowledge transmission reveals inductive biases" Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2007Vol 14 288 294 [Crossref]
17. Kirby S., Tamariz M., Cornish H., Smith K."Compression and communication in the cultural evolution of linguistic structure" Cognition 2015Vol 141 87 102 [Crossref]
18. Mesoudi A. Cultural Evolution: How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences 2011 Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press [Crossref]
19. Mesoudi A., Whiten A."The multiple roles of cultural transmission experiments in understanding human cultural evolution" Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 2008Vol 363 3489 3501 [Crossref]
20. Miton H., Claidière N., Mercier H."Universal cognitive mechanisms explain the cultural success of bloodletting" Evolution and Human Behavior 2015Vol 36 303 312 [Crossref]
21. Morin O."How portraits turned their eyes upon us: Visual preferences and demographic change in cultural evolution" Evolution and Human Behavior 2013Vol 34 222 229 [Crossref]
22. Scott-Phillips T.C. Speaking Our Minds 2014 London Palgrave Macmillan
23. Sperber D. Explaining Culture 1996 Oxford Blackwell
24. Sperber D. Aunger R."An objection to the memetic approach to culture" Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science 2000 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 163 173
25. Sperber D., Hirschfeld L.A."The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity" Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004Vol 8 40 46 [Crossref]
26. Tamariz M., Kirby S."Culture: Copying, compression, and conventionality" Cognitive Science 2014Vol 39 171 183 [Crossref]
27. Tennie C., Call J., Tomasello M."Ratcheting up the ratchet: On the evolution of cumulative culture" Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 2009Vol 364 2405 2415 [Crossref]
28. Tomasello M., Kruger A.C., Ratner H.H."Cultural learning" Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1993Vol 16 495 511 [Crossref]
29. Whiten A., McGuigan N., Marshall-Pescini S., Hopper L.M."Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee" Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 2009Vol 364 2417 2428 [Crossref]

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Journal of Cognition and Culture — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation