Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Are Atheists Implicit Theists?

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Cognition and Culture

The Cognitive Science of Religion commonly advances the view that religious beliefs emerge naturally via specific cognitive biases without cultural influence. From this perspective comes the claim that self-proclaimed atheists harbour traces of supernatural thinking. By exploring the potential influence of the cultural learning mechanism Credibility Enhancing Displays (CREDs), which affirms beliefs, current disparities between studies involved in priming the implicit theism of atheists, might be reconciled. Eighty-eight university students were randomly assigned to either a religious or control prime condition. A dictator game was completed to obtain an indication of pro-social behaviour (PSB). Lifetime theists reported significantly higher religious CREDs exposure levels than lifetime atheists, though not convert atheists. Conversely, lifetime atheists reported significantly lower CREDs exposure scores than convert atheists. Convert atheists in the prime condition were significantly more pro-social than lifetime atheists. Additionally, higher scores on the CREDs exposure measure equated to higher PSB in the religious condition than the control condition. The results are consistent with the view that supernatural belief formation is an interactive process between both context and content biases, and that in order to accurately test for implicit theism, past personal differences in exposure to religious CREDs should be considered.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology, Macquarie University Sydney, nsw 2109Australia ; 2: Department of Psychology, Macquarie University Sydney, NSW 2109Australia


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Ahmed A.M., Salas O."In the back of your mind: Subliminal influences of religious concepts on prosocial behavior" Working Papers in Economics 2008Vol 331 1 25 [Crossref]
2. Ahmed A.M., Salas O."Implicit influences of Christian religious representations on dictator and prisoner’s dilemma game decisions" Journal of Socio-Economics 2011Vol 40 242 246 [Crossref]
3. Atran S., Henrich J."The evolution of religion: How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions" Biological Theory: Integrating Development, Evolution, and Cognition 2010Vol 1 18 30
4. Atran S., Norenzayan A."Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, and communion" Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2004Vol 27 713 730
5. Atran S., Sperber D. Landsmann L.T."Learning without teaching: Its place in culture" Culture, schooling, and psychological development 1991 NJ Ablex, Norwood 39 55
6. Banerjee K., Bloom P."Would Tarzan believe in God? Conditions for the emergence of religious belief" Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2012Vol 17 7 8 [Crossref]
7. Bargh J.A., Chartrand T.L."The unbearable automaticity of being" American Psychologist 1999Vol 54 462 479 [Crossref]
8. Bargh J.A., Chartrand T.L. Reis H.T., Judd C.M."The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research" Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology 2000 New York, NY Cambridge University Press 253 284
9. Barrett J.L."Exploring the natural foundations of religion" Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000Vol 4 29 34 [Crossref]
10. Barrett J.L. Why would anyone believe in God? 2004 Walnut Creek, CA Alta Mira Press
11. Barrett J.L."The relative unnaturalness of atheism: On why Geertz and Markusson are both right and wrong" Religion 2010Vol 40 169 172 [Crossref]
12. Barrett J.L., Lanman J.A."The science of religious beliefs" Religion 2008Vol 38 109 124 [Crossref]
13. Bering J.M."The existential theory of mind" Review of General Psychology 2002Vol 6 3 24 [Crossref]
14. Bering J.M."The folk psychology of souls" Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2006Vol 29 453 498
15. Bering J.M."Atheism is only skin deep: Geertz and Markusson rely mistakenly on sociodemographic data as meaningful indicators of underlying cognition" Religion 2010Vol 40 166 168 [Crossref]
16. Bloom P."Religion is natural" Developmental Science 2007Vol 10 147 151 [Crossref]
17. Boyer P. Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought 2001 New York, NY Basic Books
18. Boyer P., Walker S. Rosengren K.S., Johnson C.N., Harris P.L."Intuitive ontology and cultural input in the acquisition of religious concepts" Imagining the impossible: Magical, scientific, and religious thinking in children 2000 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 130 156 [Crossref]
19. Dijksterhuis A., Preston J., Wegner D. M., Aarts H."Effects of subliminal priming of self and God on self-attribution of authorship for events" Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008Vol 44 2 9 [Crossref]
20. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS 2009 3rd. edn London Sage
21. Geertz A., Markusson G."Religion is natural, atheism is not: On why everybody is both right and wrong" Religion 2010Vol 40 152 165 [Crossref]
22. Gervais W.M."Perceiving minds and gods: How mind perception enables, constrains, and is triggered by belief in gods" Perspectives on Psychological Science 2013Vol 8 380 394 [Crossref]
23. Gervais W.M. Saroglou V."Religious cognition" Religion, Personality, and Social Behaviour 2014 Hove Psychology Press
24. Gervais W.M., Henrich J."The Zeus problem: Why representational content biases cannot explain faith in Gods" Journal of Cognition and Culture 2010Vol 10 383 389 [Crossref]
25. Gervais W.M., Norenzayan A."Like a camera in the sky? Thinking about God increases public self-awareness and socially desirable responding" Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012Vol 48 298 302 [Crossref]
26. Gervais W.M., Willard A., Norenzayan A., Henrich J."The cultural transmission of faith: Why natural intuitions and memory biases are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief" Religion 2011Vol 41 389 411 [Crossref]
27. Gill A., Lundsgaarde E."State welfare spending and religiosity" Rationality and Society 2004Vol 16 399 436 [Crossref]
28. Guthrie S. Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion 1993 Oxford Oxford University Press
29. Haley K.J., Fessler D.M."Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game" Evolution and Human Behaviour 2005Vol 26 245 256 [Crossref]
30. Harris P.L., Pasquini E.S., Duke S., Asscher J.J., Pons F."Germs and angels: The role of testimony in young children’s ontology" Developmental Science 2006Vol 9 76 96 [Crossref]
31. Henrich J."The evolution of costly displays, cooperation, and religion: Credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution" Evolution and Human Behaviour 2009Vol 30 244 260 [Crossref]
32. Hoffman E., McCabe K., Shachat K., Smith V."Preferences, property rights and anonymity in bargaining games" Games and Economic Behavior 1994Vol 7 346 380 [Crossref]
33. Jong J., Halberstadt J., Bluemke M."Foxhole atheism, revisited: The effects of mortality salience on explicit and implicit religious belief" Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012Vol 48 983 989 [Crossref]
34. Lanman J.A."The importance of religious displays for belief acquisition and secularization" Journal of Contemporary Religion 2012Vol 27 49 65 [Crossref]
35. Lanman J. Bullivant S., Ruse M."Atheism and cognitive science" The Oxford Handbook of Atheism 2013 Oxford Oxford University Press 468 482
36. Laurin K., Kay A.C., Fitzsimons G.M."Divergent effects of activating thoughts of God on self-regulation" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2012Vol 102 4 12 [Crossref]
37. McCauley R.N. Keil F.C., Wilson R.A."The naturalness of religion and the unnaturalness of science" Explanation and cognition 2000 Cambridge, MA MIT Press 61 86
38. McKay R., Efferson C., Whitehouse H., Fehr E."Wrath of God: Religious primes and punishment" Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 2011Vol 278 1858 1863 [Crossref]
39. Norenzayan A., Gervais W.M."The origins of religious disbelief" Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2013Vol 17 20 25 [Crossref]
40. Norenzayan A., Hansen I."Beliefs in supernatural agents in the face of death" Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006Vol 32 174 187 [Crossref]
41. Norenzayan A., Shariff A.F., Gervais W.M."The evolution of religious misbelief" Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2009Vol 32 531 532 [Crossref]
42. Norenzayan A., Henrich J., Slingerland E. Richerson P., Christiansen M."Religious prosociality: A synthesis" Cultural Evolution in press Cambridge, MA MIT Press 365 379
43. Ortmann A., Tichy L."Understanding gender effects in the laboratory: Evidence from prisoner’s dilemma games" Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1999Vol 39 327 339 [Crossref]
44. Pichon I., Boccato G., Saroglou V."Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: A priming study" European Journal of Social Psychology 2007Vol 37 1032 1045 [Crossref]
45. Preston J., Epley N."Science and God: An automatic opposition between ultimate explanations" Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009Vol 45 238 241 [Crossref]
46. Rand D.G., Dreber A., Haque O.S., Kane R.J., Nowak M.A., Coakley S."Religious motivations for cooperation: an experimental investigation using explicit primes" Religion, Brain and Behavior 2014Vol 4 31 48 [Crossref]
47. Randolph-Seng B., Nielsen M.E."Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations" International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2007Vol 17 303 315 [Crossref]
48. Randolph-Seng B., Nielsen M.E."Is God really watching you? A response to Shariff and Norenzayan" International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2007Vol 18 119 122 (2008) [Crossref]
49. Saler B., Ziegler C.A."Atheism and the apotheosis of agency" Temenos: Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion 2006Vol 42 7 41
50. Shariff A.F., Norenzayan A."God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game" Psychological Science 2007Vol 18 803 809 [Crossref]
51. Shenhav A., Rand D.G., Greene J.D."Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God" Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2012Vol 141 423 428 [Crossref]
52. Van Cappellen P., Corneille O., Cols S., Saroglou V."Beyond mere compliance to authoritative figures: Religious priming increases conformity to informational influence among submissive people" International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 2011Vol 21 97 105 [Crossref]
53. Whithouse H. Bulbulia J., Sosis R., Harris E., Genet R., Genet C., Wyman K."Cognitive evolution and religion; cognition and religious evolution" The evolution of religion 2008 Santa Margarita, CA Collins Foundation Press 31 40
54. Xygalatas D."Effects of religious setting on cooperative behavior: A case study from Mauritius" Religion, Brain and Behavior 2013Vol 3 91 102 [Crossref]
55. Zuckerman P. Martin M."Atheism: Contemporary numbers and patterns" The Cambridge Companion to Atheism 2007 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 47 65

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Journal of Cognition and Culture — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation