Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Osteology, fossil record and palaeodiversity of the European lizards

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Amphibia-Reptilia

The capability of palaeontologists to identify fossil remains of a particular group of vertebrates strongly depends on the knowledge they have of its comparative osteology and on the actual presence of diagnostic differences among the considered taxa. This could have a relevant influence on the study of palaeodiversity, since a low recognisability causes a loss of data when trying to reconstruct the history of taxa that lived on Earth in the past. Currently, more than 6000 extant species of lizards and worm lizards are known, and new ones continue to be discovered, mainly based on molecular data. But are we able to recognise this high diversity using osteology? As far as European taxa are concerned, the osteological recognisability of non-snake squamates is very low: only 31% of the extant European taxa can be identified based on their skeletal morphology. This is balanced partially by the fact that most recognisable taxa have been actually recognised in the fossil record, suggesting that the lost data are mainly due to the scarce knowledge of the comparative osteology of these reptiles and less influenced by other biases, such as taphonomic or collection biases. In this context, specimen-level phylogenetic analysis has proved to be a useful tool to identify diagnostic combinations of osteological features, at least for lacertid species, as evidenced by a case study focused on the genus Lacerta.

Affiliations: 1: 1Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Torino, via Valperga Caluso 35, 10125 Torino, Italy ; 2: 2GeoBioTec, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal ; 3: 3Museu da Lourinhã, Rua João Luís de Moura, 2530-157 Lourinhã, Portugal ; 4: 4Department of Geosciences, University of Fribourg/Freiburg, Chemin du Musée 6, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland ; 5: 5Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Edifici ICTA-ICP, Carrer de les Columnes s/n, Campus de la UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain

*Corresponding author; e-mail: a.villa@unito.it
Loading data from figshare Loading data from figshare
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685381-00003085
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Amann T., Rykena S., Joger U., Nettmann H.K., Veith M. (1997): "Zur artlichen trennung von Lacerta bilineata Daudin, 1802 und L. viridis (Laurenti, 1768)". Salamandra Vol 33: 255-268.
2. Arnold E.N., Arribas O., Carranza S. (2007): "Systematics of the palaearctic and oriental lizard tribe Lacertini (Squamata: Lacertidae: Lacertinae), with descriptions of eight new genera". Zootaxa Vol 1430: 3-86. [Crossref]
3. Arnold N., Ovenden D. (2002): A Field Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians of Britain and Europe. HarperCollins Publisher, London.
4. Arribas O., Carranza S. (2004): "Morphological and genetic evidence of the full species status of Iberolacerta cyreni martinezricai (Arribas, 1996)". Zootaxa Vol 634: 1-24. [Crossref]
5. Bell C.J., Gauthier J.A., Bever G.S. (2010): "Covert biases, circularity, and apomorphies: a critical look at the North American Quaternary Herpetofaunal Stability Hypothesis". Quat. Int. Vol 217: 30-36. [Crossref]
6. Bell C.J., Mead J.I. (2014): "Not enough skeletons in the closet: collections-based anatomical research in an age of conservation conscience". Anat. Rec. Vol 297: 344-348. [Crossref]
7. Blain H.-A. (2009): "Contribution de la paléoherpétofaune (Amphibia & Squamata) à la connaissance de l’évolution du climat et du paysage du Pliocène supérieur au Pléistocène moyen d’Espagne". Treballs del Museu de Geologia de Barcelona Vol 16: 39-170.
8. Böhme M., Ilg A. (2003): fosFARbase, (2015).
9. Boulenger G.A. (1917): "A revision of the lizards of the genus Nucras, Gray". Ann. S. Afr. Mus. Vol 13: 195-215.
10. Carranza S., Arnold E.N., Amat F. (2004): "DNA phylogeny of Lacerta (Iberolacerta) and other lacertine lizards (Reptilia: Lacertidae): did competition cause long-term mountain restriction?" Syst. Biodivers. Vol 2: 57-77. [Crossref]
11. Cooper R.A., Maxwell P.A., Crampton J.S., Beu A.G., Jones C.M., Marshall B.A. (2006): "Completeness of the fossil record: estimating losses due to small body size". Geology Vol 34: 241-244. [Crossref]
12. Daza J.D., Stanley E.L., Wagner P., Bauer A.M., Grimaldi D.A. (2016): "Mid-Cretaceous amber fossils illuminate the past diversity of tropical lizards". Sci. Adv. Vol 2: e1501080. [Crossref]
13. Delfino M. (2004): "Herpetological paleodiversity: general considerations about the Italian fossil record of modern species". Ital. J. Zool. Vol 71: 13-16. [Crossref]
14. Dunhill A.M., Benton M.J., Twitchett R.J., Newell A.J. (2012): "Completeness of the fossil record and the validity of sampling proxies at outcrop level". Palaeontology Vol 55: 1155-1175.
15. Estes R. (1983): Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie 10A. Sauria terrestria, Amphisbaenia. Friedrich Pfeil, München.
16. Evans S.E. (2008): "The skull of lizards and Tuatara". In: Biology of the Reptilia, p.  1-347. Gans C., Gaunt A., Eds, Ithaca, New York.
17. Goloboff P.A. (2014): "Extended implied weighting". Cladistics Vol 30: 260-272. [Crossref]
18. Goloboff P.A., Farris J.S., Nixon K.C. (2008): "TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis". Cladistics Vol 24: 774-786. [Crossref]
19. Gvoždík V., Benkovský N., Crottini A., Bellati A., Moravec J., Romano A., Sacchi R., Jandzik D. (2013): "An ancient lineage of slow worms, genus Anguis (Squamata: Anguidae), survived in the Italian Peninsula". Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. Vol 69: 1077-1092. [Crossref]
20. Gvoždík V., Jandzik D., Lymberakis P., Jablonski D., Moravec J. (2010): "Slow worm, Anguis fragilis (Reptilia: Anguidae) as a species complex: genetic structure reveals deep divergences". Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. Vol 55: 460-472. [Crossref]
21. Kapli P., Poulakakis N., Lymberakis P., Mylonas M. (2011): "A re-analysis of the molecular phylogeny of Lacertidae with currently available data". Basic and Applied Herpetology Vol 25: 97-104.
22. Maddison W.P., Maddison D.R. (2015): Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.04. http://mesquiteproject.org.
23. Marzahn E., Mayer W., Joger U., Ilgaz Ç., Jablonski D., Kindler C., Kumlutaş Y., Nistri A., Schneeweiss N., Vamberger M., Žagar A., Fritz U. (2016): "Phylogeography of the Lacerta viridis complex: mitochondrial and nuclear markers provide taxonomic insights". J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. Vol 54: 85-105. [Crossref]
24. Mendes J., Harris D.J., Carranza S., Salvi D. (2016): "Evaluating the phylogenetic signal limit from mitogenomes, slow evolving nuclear genes, and the concatenation approach. New insights into the Lacertini radiation using fast evolving nuclear genes and species trees". Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. Vol 100: 254-267. [Crossref]
25. Pincheira-Donoso D., Bauer A.M., Meiri S., Uetz P. (2013): "Global taxonomic diversity of living reptiles". PLoS ONE Vol 8: e59741. [Crossref]
26. Rage J.-C. (2013): "Mesozoic and Cenozoic squamates of Europe". Palaeobio. Palaeoenv. Vol 93: 517-534. [Crossref]
27. Rykena S. (1991): "Kreuzungsexperimente zur prüfung der artgrenzen im genus Lacerta sensu stricto". Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin. Zoologisches Museum Und Institut Für Spezielle Zoologie (Berlin) Vol 67: 55-68. [Crossref]
28. Sillero N., Campos J., Bonardi A., Corti C., Creemers R., Crochet P.-A., Crnobrnja Isailović J., Denoël M., Ficetola G.F., Gonçalves J., Kuzmin S., Lymberakis P., de Pous P., Rodríguez A., Sindaco R., Speybroeck J., Toxopeus B., Vieites D.R., Vences M. (2014): "Updated distribution and biogeography of amphibians and reptiles of Europe". Amphibia-Reptilia Vol 35: 1-31. [Crossref]
29. Soligo C., Andrews P. (2005): "Taphonomic bias, taxonomic bias and historical non-equivalence of faunal structure in early hominin localities". J. Hum. Evol. Vol 49: 206-229. [Crossref]
30. Speybroeck J., Beukema W., Bok B., Van der Voort J. (2016): Field Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of Britain and Europe. Bloomsbury Publishing, London.
31. Uetz P., Hošek J., Eds: The Reptile Database, http://www.reptile-database.org, accessed June 29, 2016.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685381-00003085
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685381-00003085
2017-02-15
2017-11-24

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Amphibia-Reptilia — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation