Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Error rates and variation between observers are reduced with the use of photographic matching software for capture-recapture studies

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Photographic capture-mark-recapture (CMR) permits individual recognition whilst avoiding many of the concerns involved with marking animals. However, the construction of capture histories from photographs is a time-consuming process. Furthermore, matching accuracy is determined based on subjective judgements of the person carrying out the matching, which can lead to errors in the resulting datasets – particularly in long-term projects where multiple observers match images. We asked 63 volunteers to carry out two photographic-matching exercises using a database of known individuals of the yellow-bellied toad (Bombina variegata). From these exercises, we quantified the matching accuracy of volunteers in terms of false-acceptance and false-rejection rates. Not only were error rates greatly reduced with the use of photographic-matching software, but variation in error rates among volunteers was also lowered. Furthermore, the use of matching software led to substantial increases in matching speeds and an 87% reduction in the false-rejection rate. As even small error rates have the potential to bias CMR analyses, these results suggest that computer software could substantially reduce errors in CMR datasets. The time-savings and reduction in variance among observers suggest that such methods could be particularly beneficial in long-term CMR projects where a large number of images may be matched by multiple observers.

Affiliations: 1: 1Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland ; 2: 2Info Fauna Karch, Passage Maximilien-de-Meuron 6, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland

*Corresponding author; e-mail: sam.cruickshank@ieu.uzh.ch
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685381-00003112
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Arntzen J.W., Goudie I., Halley J., Jehle R. (2004): "Cost comparison of marking techniques in long-term population studies: PIT-tags versus pattern maps". Amphibia-Reptilia Vol 25: 305-315.
2. Arzoumanian Z. (2005): "An astronomical pattern-matching algorithm for computer-aided identification of whale sharks Rhincodon typus". J. Appl. Ecol. Vol 42: 999-1011. [Crossref]
3. Bendik N.F., Morrison T.A., Gluesenkamp A.G., Sanders M.S., O’Donnell L.J. (2013): "Computer-assisted photo identification outperforms visible implant elastomers in an endangered salamander, Eurycea tonkawae". PLoS One Vol 8: e59424. [Crossref]
4. Bolger D.T., Morrison T.A., Vance B., Lee D., Farid H. (2012): "A computer-assisted system for photographic mark-recapture analysis". Methods Ecol. Evol. Vol 3: 813-822. [Crossref]
5. Brandt H. (2015): Dispersal in a metapopulation of the yellow-bellied toad: Does conservation action work? M.Sc. Thesis, University of Zürich, Zürich.
6. Burt M.L., Borchers D.L., Jenkins K.J., Marques T.A. (2014): "Using mark-recapture distance sampling methods on line transect surveys". Methods in Ecology and Evolution Vol 5: 1180-1191. [Crossref]
7. Campbell T.S., Irvin P., Campbell K.R., Hoffmann K., Dykes M.E., Harding A.J., Johnson S.A. (2009): "Evaluation of a new technique for marking anurans". Applied Herpetology Vol 6: 247-256. [Crossref]
8. Cayuela H., Arsovski D., Thirion J.-M., Bonnaire E., Pichenot J., Boitaud S., Brison A.-L., Miaud C., Joly P., Besnard A. (2016): "Contrasting patterns of environmental fluctuation contribute to divergent life histories among amphibian populations". Ecology Vol 97: 980-991. [Crossref]
9. Clutton-Brock T., Sheldon B.C. (2010): "Individuals and populations: the role of long-term, individual-based studies of animals in ecology and evolutionary biology". Trends Ecol. Evol. Vol 25: 562-573. [Crossref]
10. Creel S., Spong G., Sands J.L., Rotella J., Zeigle J., Joe L., Murphy K.M., Smith D. (2003): "Population size estimation in Yellowstone wolves with error-prone noninvasive microsatellite genotypes". Mol. Ecol. Vol 12: 2003-2009. [Crossref]
11. Cross M.D., Lipps G.J., Sapak J.M., Tobin E.J., Root K.V. (2014): "Pattern-recognition software as a supplemental method of identifying individual eastern box turtles (Terrapene c. carolina)". Herpetol. Rev. Vol 45: 584-586.
12. Dala-Corte R.B., Moschetta J.B., Becker F.G. (2016): "Photo-identification as a technique for recognition of individual fish: a test with the freshwater armored catfish Rineloricaria aequalicuspis Reis & Cardoso, 2001 (Siluriformes: Loricariidae)". Neotrop. Ichthyol. Vol 14: e150074.
13. Drechsler A., Helling T., Steinfartz S. (2015): "Genetic fingerprinting proves cross-correlated automatic photo-identification of individuals as highly efficient in large capture-mark-recapture studies". Ecol. Evol. Vol 5: 141-151. [Crossref]
14. Elgue E., Pereira G., Achaval-coppes F., Maneyro R. (2014): "Validity of photo-identification technique to analyze natural markings in Melanophryniscus montevidensis (Anura: Bufonidae)". Phyllomedusa Vol 13: 59-66. [Crossref]
15. Gamble L., Ravela S., McGarigal K. (2007): "Multi-scale features for identifying individuals in large biological databases: an application of pattern recognition technology to the marbled salamander Ambystoma opacum". J. Appl. Ecol. Vol 45: 170-180. [Crossref]
16. Gollmann G., Gollmann B. (2011): "Ontogenetic change of colour pattern in Bombina variegata: implications for individual identification". Herpetol. Notes Vol 4: 333-335.
17. Grant E.H.C. (2008): "Visual implant elastomer mark retention through metamorphosis in amphibian larvae". J. Wildl. Manage. Vol 72: 1247-1252. [Crossref]
18. Halloran K.M., Murdoch J.D., Becker M.S. (2015): "Applying computer-aided photo-identification to messy datasets: a case study of Thornicroft’s giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis thornicrofti)". Afr. J. Ecol. Vol 53: 147-155. [Crossref]
19. Hasen D. (2011): Bestandsuntersuchung von Gelbbauchunken-Populationen im Talkessel Schwyz-Ingenbohl mittels Fang-Wiederfang-Methode. B.Sc. Thesis, Zurcher Hochschule Fur Angewandte Wissenschaften, Zurich.
20. Hastings K., Hiby L., Small R. (2008): "Evaluation of a computer-assisted photograph-matching system to monitor naturally marked harbor seals at Tugidak Island, Alaska". J. Mammal. Vol 89: 1201-1211. [Crossref]
21. Hiby L., Paterson W.D., Redman P., Watkins J., Twiss S.D., Pomeroy P. (2013): "Analysis of photo-id data allowing for missed matches and individuals identified from opposite sides". Methods Ecol. Evol. Vol 4: 252-259. [Crossref]
22. Huffard C.L., Caldwell R.L., DeLoach N., Gentry D.W., Humann P., MacDonald B., Moore B., Ross R., Uno T., Wong S. (2008): "Individually unique body color patterns in Octopus (Wunderpus photogenicus) allow for photoidentification". PLoS One Vol 3: e3732. [Crossref]
23. Jain A. (2007): "Technology: biometric recognition". Nature Vol 449: 38-40. [Crossref]
24. Jordan M. (2012): Untersuchung von Populationsgrösse und Dispersionsverhalten der Gelbbauchunken-Population im Talkessel Schwyz-Ingenbohl. B.Sc. Thesis, Zurcher Hochschule Fur Angewandte Wissenschaften, Zürich.
25. Kelly M.J. (2001): "Computer-aided photograph matching in studies using individual identification: an example from Serengeti cheetahs". J. Mammal. Vol 82: 440-449. [Crossref]
26. Kenyon N., Phillott A., Alford R.A. (2009): "Evaluation of the photographic identification method (PIM) as a tool to identify adult Litoria genimaculata (Anura: Hylidae)". Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. Vol 4: 403-410.
27. Lebreton J., Burnham K.P., Clobert J., Anderson D.R. (1992): "Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies". Ecol. Monogr. Vol 62: 67-118. [Crossref]
28. Link W.A. (2003): "Nonidentifiability of population size from capture-recapture data with heterogeneous detection probabilities". Biometrics Vol 59: 1123-1130. [Crossref]
29. Link W.A., Yoshizaki J., Bailey L.L., Pollock K.H. (2010): "Uncovering a latent multinomial: analysis of mark-recapture data with misidentification". Biometrics Vol 66: 178-185. [Crossref]
30. Lowe D.G. (2004): "Distinctive image features from scale invariant keypoints". Int. J. Comput. Vis. Vol 60: 91-110. [Crossref]
31. Lukacs P.M., Burnham K.P. (2005): "Review of capture-recapture methods applicable to noninvasive genetic sampling". Mol. Ecol. Vol 14: 3909-3919. [Crossref]
32. Marshall A., Pierce S. (2012): "The use and abuse of photographic identification in sharks and rays". J. Fish Biol. Vol 80: 1361-1379. [Crossref]
33. May R.M. (2004): "Ethics and amphibians". Nature Vol 431: 403. [Crossref]
34. McDonald T.L., Amstrup S.C., Manly B.F.J. (2003): "Tag loss can bias Jolly-Seber capture-recapture estimates". Wildl. Soc. Bull. Vol 31: 814-822.
35. Merkle J.A., Fortin D. (2013): "Likelihood-based photograph identification: application with photographs of free-ranging bison". Wildl. Soc. Bull. Vol 38: 196-204. [Crossref]
36. Morrison T.A., Yoshizaki J., Nichols J.D., Bolger D.T. (2011): "Estimating survival in photographic capture-recapture studies: overcoming misidentification error". Methods Ecol. Evol. Vol 2: 454-463. [Crossref]
37. Morrison T.A., Bolger D.T. (2014): "Connectivity and bottlenecks in a migratory wildebeest Connochaetes taurinus population". Oryx Vol 48: 1-9. [Crossref]
38. Morrison T.A., Keinath D., Estes-Zumpf W., Crall J.P., Stewart C.V. (2016): "Individual identification of the endangered Wyoming toad Anaxyrus baxteri and implications for monitoring species recovery". J. Herpetol. Vol 50: 44-49. [Crossref]
39. Moya Ó., Mansilla P.-L., Madrazo S., Igual J.-M., Rotger A., Romano A., Tavecchia G. (2015): "APHIS: a new software for photo-matching in ecological studies". Ecol. Inform. Vol 27: 64-70. [Crossref]
40. Murray D.L., Fuller M.R. (2000): "A critical review of the effects of marking on the biology of vertebrates". In: Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences, p.  15-64. Boitani L., Fuller T.K., Eds, Colombia University Press, New York.
41. Narayan E.J., Molinia F.C., Kindermann C., Cockrem J.F., Hero J.M. (2011): "Urinary corticosterone responses to capture and toe-clipping in the cane toad (Rhinella marina) indicate that toe-clipping is a stressor for amphibians". Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. Vol 74: 238-245. [Crossref]
42. Parris K.M., McCarthy M.A. (2001): "Identifying effects of toe clipping on anuran return rates: the importance of statistical power". Amphibia-Reptilia Vol 22: 275-289. [Crossref]
43. Pradel R., Hines J.E., Lebreton J.-D., Nichols J.D. (1997): "Capture-recapture survival models taking account of transients". Biometrics Vol 53: 60-72. [Crossref]
44. Sacchi R., Scali S., Pellitteri-Rosa D. (2010): "Photographic identification in reptiles: a matter of scales". Amphibia-Reptilia Vol 31: 489-502. [Crossref]
45. Sacchi R., Scali S., Mangiacotti M., Sannolo M., Zuffi M.A.L. (2016): "Digital identification and analysis". In: Reptile Ecology and Conservation. A Handbook of Techniques, p.  59-72. Dodd C.K., Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Crossref]
46. Schmidt K., Schwarzkopf L. (2010): "Visible implant elastomer tagging and toe-clipping: effects of marking on locomotor performance of frogs and skinks". Herpetol. J. Vol 20: 99-105.
47. Scott D.K. (1978): "Identification of individual Bewick’s swans by bill patterns". In: Animal Marking: Recognition Marking of Animals in Research, p.  160-168. Stonehouse B., Ed., Macmillan, London.
48. Sears R., Williamson J.M., Wenzel F.W., Berube M., Gendron D., Jones P. (1990): "Photographic identification of the blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus) in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada". In: Individual Recognition of Cetaceans: Use of Photo-Identification and Other Techniques to Estimate Population Parameters. IWC Rep. Special Issue 12, p.  335-342. Hammond P.S., Mizroch S.A., Donovan G.P., Eds, Mingan Island Cetacean Study, St. Lambert, Quebec, Canada.
49. Sherley R.B., Burghardt T., Barham P.J., Campbell N., Cuthill I.C. (2010): "Spotting the difference: towards fully-automated population monitoring of African penguins Spheniscus demersus". Endanger. Species Res. Vol 11: 101-111. [Crossref]
50. Silvy N.J., Lopez R.R., Peterson M.J. (2012): "Techniques for marking wildlife". In: The Wildlife Techniques Manual, p.  230-257. Silvy N.J., Ed., Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
51. Stevick P., Palsbøll P. (2001): "Errors in identification using natural markings: rates, sources, and effects on capture recapture estimates of abundance". Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Vol 58: 1861-1870.
52. Town C., Marshall A., Sethasathien N. (2013): "Manta matcher: automated photographic identification of manta rays using keypoint features". Ecol. Evol. Vol 3: 1902-1914. [Crossref]
53. Treilibs C.E., Pavey C.R., Hutchinson M.N., Bull C.M. (2016): "Photographic identification of individuals of a free-ranging, small terrestrial vertebrate". Ecol. Evol. Vol 6: 800-809. [Crossref]
54. Vörös J., Szalay F., Barabás L. (2007): "A new method for quantitative pattern analysis applied to two European Bombina species". Herpetol. J. Vol 17: 97-103.
55. Waite J.N., Mellish J.A.E. (2009): "Inter- and intra-researcher variation in measurement of morphometrics on Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus)". Polar Biol. Vol 32: 1221-1225. [Crossref]
56. Yoshizaki J. (2007): Use of natural tags in closed population capture-recapture studies: modeling misidentification. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University.
57. Yoshizaki J., Pollock K.H., Brownie C., Webster R. (2009): "Modeling misidentification errors in capture-recapture studies using photographic identification of evolving marks". Ecology Vol 90: 3-9. [Crossref]
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685381-00003112
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685381-00003112
2017-08-01
2017-12-17

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Amphibia-Reptilia — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation