Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Intraspecific call variation in a Neotropical gladiator frog with a complex advertisement call

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Amphibia-Reptilia

Vocalisation is one of the most conspicuous behavioural traits in different animals, but its emission can be variable within species, depending on environmental, morphological, and/or social factors. Understanding how acoustic parameters vary can provide information about sexual selection mechanisms that might have shaped the species’ evolutionary history. We quantified and compared the variation of five call parameters within and among the males of Bokermannohyla ibitiguara, a Neotropical treefrog with complex reproduction and advertisement calls. The parameters were classified as static (dominant frequency), intermediate (note durations) or dynamic (pulse rate of the long note and call duration). Despite these differences, all of them varied more among individuals than within individuals, and most were associated with individual discrimination, showing potential acoustic recognition by males and females. A multiple regression analysis showed that all temporal parameters were affected by abiotic factors, except pulse rate of the long note; body size affected dominant frequency, duration of the long notes and call duration. This high variability in parameters, and the strong support for individual discrimination, indicate the existence of sexual selection mechanisms operating on calls; however, the individual recognition system is very complex and not limited to a single characteristic of the call. This is supported by the reproductive behavior of this species, including choosy females, elaborate courtships, and male-male vocal contests and physical combats. Fine-scale playback experiments with males and females will help us further understand sexual selection mechanisms in this and other acoustically oriented animals.

Affiliations: 1: 1Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Departamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia Animal, 14884-900 Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brasil ; 2: 2Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil

*Corresponding author; e-mail: r_nali@yahoo.com.br
Loading data from figshare Loading data from figshare
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685381-00003147
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Bee M.A., Gerhardt H.C. (2001): "Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): I. Acoustic basis". Anim. Behav. Vol 62: 1129-1140. [Crossref]
2. Bee M.A., Kozich C.E., Blackwell K.J., Gerhardt H.C. (2001): "Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male green frog, Rana clamitans: implications for individual discrimination". Ethology Vol 107: 65-84. [Crossref]
3. Bee M.A., Cook J.M., Love E.K., O’Bryan L.R., Pettit B.A., Schrode K., Vélez A. (2010): "Assessing acoustic signal variability and the potential for sexual selection and social recognition in boreal chorus frogs (Pseudacris maculata)". Ethology Vol 116: 564-576. [Crossref]
4. Bee M.A., Suyesh R., Biju S.D. (2013): "The vocal repertoire of Pseudophilautus kani, a shrub frog (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from the Western Ghats of India". Bioacoustics Vol 22: 67-85. [Crossref]
5. Bradbury J.W., Vehrencamp S.L. (2011): Principles of Animal Communication, 2nd Edition. Sinauer, Sunderland.
6. Cangelosi R., Goriely A. (2007): "Component retention in principal component analysis with application to cDNA microarray data". Biol. Direct Vol 2: 1-21. [Crossref]
7. Caramaschi U., Eterovick P.C. (2004): Bokermannohyla ibitiguara. The international union for the conservation of nature, red list of threatened species. Version 2017-1. Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/55509/0. Accessed on 26 August 2017.
8. Cardoso A.J. (1983): "Descrição e biologia de uma nova espécie de Hyla Laurenti, 1768 (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae)". Iheringia Ser. Zool. Vol 62: 37-45.
9. Carvalho T.R., Giaretta A.A., Magrini L. (2012): "A new species of the Bokermannohyla circumdata group (Anura: Hylidae) from southeastern Brazil, with bioacoustic data on seven species of the genus". Zootaxa Vol 3321: 37-55.
10. Cohen J. (1960): "A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales". Educ. Psychol. Meas. Vol 20: 37-46. [Crossref]
11. de Sá F.P., Zina J., Haddad C.F.B. (2016): "Sophisticated communication in the Brazilian torrent frog Hylodes japi". PLoS ONE Vol 11: e0145444.
12. Faivovich J., Haddad C.F.B., Garcia P.C.A., Frost D.R., Campbell J.A., Wheeler W.C. (2005): "Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to Hylinae: phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision". B. Am. Nat. Hist. Vol 294: 1-240. [Crossref]
13. Frost D.R. (2017): Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 6.0 – American Museum of Natural History. Available at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html. Accessed on 02 September 2017.
14. Gambale P.G., Signorelli L., Bastos R.P. (2014): "Individual variation in the advertisement calls of a Neotropical treefrog (Scinax constrictus)". Amphibia-Reptilia Vol 35: 271-281. [Crossref]
15. Gerhardt H.C. (1991): "Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria". Anim. Behav. Vol 42: 615-635. [Crossref]
16. Gerhardt H.C. (1994): "The evolution of vocalization in frogs and toads". Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. Vol 25: 293-324. [Crossref]
17. Gerhardt H.C., Brooks R. (2009): "Experimental evidence of multivariate female choice in gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor): evidence for directional and stabilizing selection". Evolution Vol 63: 2504-2512. [Crossref]
18. Ghasemi A., Zahediasl S. (2012): "Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians". Int. J. Endocrinol. Metab. Vol 10: 486-489. [Crossref]
19. Gingras B., Boeckle M., Herbst C.T., Fitch W.T. (2013): "Call acoustics reflect body size across four clades of anurans". J. Zool. Vol 289: 143-150. [Crossref]
20. Guerra V., Morais A.R., Gambale P.G., Oda F.H., Bastos R.P. (2017): "Variation of the advertisement call of Physalaemus centralis Bokermann, 1962 (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in the Cerrado of central Brazil". Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. Vol 52: 1-9. [Crossref]
21. Hirschman W., Höd W. (2006): "Visual signaling in Phrynobatrachus krefftii Boulenger, 1909 (Anura: Ranidae)". Herpetologica Vol 62: 18-27. [Crossref]
22. Howard R.D., Young J.R. (1998): "Individual variation in male vocal traits and female mating preferences in Bufo americanus". Anim. Behav. Vol 55: 1165-1179. [Crossref]
23. Junior A.F.C., Souza V.V., Junior O.B.C., Martins E.D. (2010): "Integração de parâmetros morfométricos e imagem aster para a delimitação das fitofisionomias da Serra da Canastra, Parque Nacional da Serra da Canastra, MG". Rev. Bras. Geomorf. Vol 11: 57-68.
24. Kaefer I.L., Lima A.P. (2012): "Sexual signals of the Amazonian frog Allobates paleovarzensis: geographic variation and stereotypy of acoustic traits". Behaviour Vol 149: 15-33. [Crossref]
25. Martinez-Rivera C.C., Gerhardt H.C. (2008): "Advertisement-call modification, male competition and female preference in the bird-voiced treefrog Hyla avivoca". Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 63: 195-208. [Crossref]
26. Martins I.A., Jim J. (2003): "Bioacoustic analysis of advertisement call in Hyla nana and Hyla sanborni (Anura, Hylidae) in Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil". Braz. J. Biol. Vol 63: 507-516. [Crossref]
27. McClelland B.E., Wilczynski W., Ryan M.J. (1996): "Correlations between call characteristics and morphology in male cricket frogs (Acris crepitans)". J. Exp. Biol. Vol 199: 1907-1919.
28. McDiarmid R.W. (1994): "Preparing amphibians as scientific specimens". In: Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians, p.  289-297. Heyer W.R., Donnelly M.A., McDiarmid R.W., Hayek L.C., Foster M.S., Eds, Smithsonian Books, Washington.
29. McHugh M.L. (2012): "Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic". Biochem. Med. Vol 22: 276-282. [Crossref]
30. Morais A.R., Batista V.G., Gambale P.G., Signorelli L., Bastos R.P. (2012): "Acoustic communication in a Neotropical frog (Dendropsophus minutus): vocal repertoire, variability and individual discrimination". Herpetol. J. Vol 22: 49-257.
31. Murphy C.G., Gerhardt H.C. (2002): "Mate sampling by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa)". Behav. Ecol. Vol 13: 472-480. [Crossref]
32. Nali R.C., Prado C.P.A. (2012): "Habitat use, reproductive traits and social interactions in a stream-dweller treefrog endemic to the Brazilian Cerrado". Amphibia-Reptilia Vol 33: 337-347. [Crossref]
33. Nali R.C., Prado C.P.A. (2014a): "Complex call with different messages in Bokermannohyla ibitiguara (Anura, Hylidae), a gladiator frog of the Brazilian Cerrado". J. Herpetol. Vol 48: 407-414. [Crossref]
34. Nali R.C., Prado C.P.A. (2014b): "The fight call of Bokermannohyla ibitiguara (Anura: Hylidae): first record for the genus". Salamandra Vol 50: 181-184.
35. Nali R.C. (2016): Diversificação e hibridação em um anuro endêmico do Cerrado: Genética, morfologia e comportamento. Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, state of São Paulo, Brazil.
36. Narins P.M., Fneg A.S., Fay R.R., Popper A.N., Eds (2006): Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians, 1st Edition. Springer, New York.
37. Pettit B.A., Bourne G.R., Bee M.A. (2013): "Advertisement call variation in the golden rocket frog (Anomaloglossus beebei): evidence for individual distinctiveness". Ethology Vol 119: 244-256. [Crossref]
38. R Development Core Team (2017): R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org.
39. Rand A.S., Ryan M.J. (1981): "The adaptive significance of a complex vocal repertoire in a Neotropical frog". Z. Tierpsychol. Vol 57: 209-214. [Crossref]
40. Ryan M.J. (1980): "Female mate choice in a Neotropical frog". Science Vol 209: 523-525. [Crossref]
41. Ryan M.J. (1988a): "Energy, calling and selection". Am. Zool. Vol 28: 885-898. [Crossref]
42. Ryan M.J. (1988b): "Constraints and patterns in the evolution of anuran acoustic communication". In: The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System, p.  637-677. Fritzsch B., Ryan M.J., Wilczynski W., Hetherington T.E., Walkowiak W., Eds, Wiley, New Jersey.
43. Ryan M.J. (2009): "Communication in frogs and toads". In: Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, p.  1159-1166. Squire L.R., Ed., Academic Press, Oxford. [Crossref]
44. Schaefer H.M., Ruxton G.D. (2015): "Signal diversity, sexual selection, and speciation". Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. Vol 46: 573-592. [Crossref]
45. StatSoft, Inc. (2011): STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. www.statsoft.com.
46. Tessarolo G., Maciel N.M., Morais A.R., Bastos R.P. (2006): "Geographic variation in advertisement calls among populations of Dendropsophus cruzi (Anura: Hylidae)". Herpetol. J. Vol 26: 219-224.
47. Toledo L.F., Martins I.A., Bruschi D.P., Passos M.A., Alexaandre C., Haddad C.F.B. (2015): "The anuran calling repertoire in the light of social context". Acta Ethol. Vol 18: 97-99. [Crossref]
48. Wagner W.E. (1988): "Social correlates of variation in male calling behavior in Blanchard’s cricket frogs, Acris crepitans blanchardi". Ethology Vol 82: 27-45. [Crossref]
49. Wagner W.E. (1989): "Fighting, assessment, and frequency alteration in Blanchard’s cricket frog". Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 25: 429-436. [Crossref]
50. Waichman A.V. (1992): "An alphanumeric code for toe clipping amphibians and reptiles". Herpetol. Rev. Vol 23: 19-21.
51. Wells K.D. (1977): "The social behaviour of anuran amphibians". Anim. Behav. Vol 25: 666-693. [Crossref]
52. Wells K.D. (2007): The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians, 1st Edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. [Crossref]
53. Wollerman L. (1998): "Stabilizing and directional preferences of female Hyla ebraccata for calls differing in static properties". Anim. Behav. Vol 55: 1619-1630. [Crossref]
54. Yasumiba K., Alford R.A., Schwarzkopf L. (2015): "Why do male and female cane toads, Rhinella marina, respond differently to advertisement calls?" Anim. Behav. Vol 109: 141-147. [Crossref]
55. Zar J.H. (2010): Biostatistical Analysis, 5th Edition. Prentice-Hall, Pearson.
56. Ziegler L., Arim M., Bozinovic F. (2016): "Intraspecific scaling in frog calls: the interplay of temperature, body size and metabolic condition". Oecologia Vol 181: 673-681. [Crossref]
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/15685381-00003147
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/15685381-00003147
2018-03-07
2018-09-18

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Amphibia-Reptilia — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation