Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

THE ECONOMICS OF GETTING HIGH: DECISIONS MADE BY COMMON GULLS DROPPING COCKLES TO OPEN THEM

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Common gulls drop cockles onto hard sand to open them. Gulls dropped cockles 2.9 ± 0.36 times to open them, from a mean height of 24.68 ± 1.74 m. Drop heights decreased significantly during a dropping sequence. Opened cockles had a mean shell-length of 32.22 ± 0.59 mm, which was similar to the size of available cockles. An economic model showed that gulls should drop cockles of average size twice from a mean height of 31.22 m to maximise their net rate of energy gain. The model showed that intake rates were similar for two-drop strategies with a mean drop height of 31.22 m, irrespective of the distribution of drop heights within the sequence, provided the first drop was less than the height at which cockles reached terminal velocity. The combination of number of drops and drop heights varied between cockle sizes, but model results were general - the optimum economic dropping strategy for a given size consisted of a number of drops from a constant height. Model predictions were, therefore, significantly different from observed behaviour. A risk of kleptoparasitism was added to the economic model by assuming gulls lost their cockle to a parasite if it was dropped above a threshold height immediately prior to opening. This showed that the number of drops in a sequence increased and mean drop height decreased compared with the average economic optimum. Drop heights within a sequence were also predicted to decrease in the presence of kleptoparasitism because the final drop was constrained to be lower than the height at which kleptoparasitism occurs. Previous drops in the sequence have to be increased in height as a result to ensure the cockle experiences sufficient impact energy to open. The inclusion of a risk of kleptoparasitism, therefore, increased the correspondence between model predictions and observed behaviour. The role of kleptoparasitism in decision making by gulls in the wild is discussed.

Affiliations: 1: School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 228, Reading, RG6 6AJ, UK6AT, UK; 2: School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 228, Reading, RG6 6AJ, UK; 3: Centre for Biomimetics, University of Reading, 1 Earley Gate, Reading, RG6 6AT,UK

10.1163/156853900502349
/content/journals/10.1163/156853900502349
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853900502349
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853900502349
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853900502349
2000-06-01
2016-12-04

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation