Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

THE EFFECTS OF CONTEXT, SEX, AND BODY SIZE ON STAGED SOCIAL INTERACTIONS IN JUVENILE MALE AND FEMALE GREEN ANOLES (ANOLIS CAROLINENSIS)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

We documented the ontogeny of headbobbing display use in green anoles (Anolis carolinensis) by determining the effects of social context, sex, and body size on juvenile social interactions. Juveniles only gave displays in social interactions (never while isolated), and activity levels in general were much higher during interactions than during isolation. Neither social context (consexual or heterosexual) nor sex affected the type or quantity of displays and related behaviors (perch shifts, display modifiers, color changes, and approaches or retreats). Interactions always appeared to be aggressive in nature and qualitatively similar to interactions between adult females. Both males and females tended to increase overall activity during interactions with body size, including the use of displays and related behaviors, and large juvenile males performed more headbobbing displays than did large juvenile females. These results suggest that juvenile social interactions are agonistic in nature and that they function to defend both immediate and future resources (prospective resource hypothesis). It is likely that resource protection confers the immediate benefits of suitable habitat for foraging, thermoregulation, and predator avoidance, and it is hypothesized that the primary future benefit is the acquisition of the eventual breeding territory that juveniles will hold as adults.

Affiliations: 1: Biology Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA

10.1163/156853901753287163
/content/journals/10.1163/156853901753287163
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853901753287163
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853901753287163
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853901753287163
2001-09-01
2016-12-03

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation