Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Constraints on relationship formation among female primates

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Behaviour

The notion that female primates' relationships are adaptive is an explicit assumption of socioecological models of primate sociality. Here, we point out that there are other, implicit, assumptions about female relationships that also need to be considered when investigating the ultimate value of social relationships. First, there is the assumption that the operational definition of 'relationship' used in primate studies is an accurate reflection of the way in which monkeys themselves view their interactions with their peers. We also note that a relationship-based approach encourages a focus on the outcomes of social processes, rather than their dynamics, and could generate a potentially misleading view of primate sociality. Related to this first point, we also question the assumption that females possess the cognitive capacities required to engage in the long-term strategic decision-making and are capable of a high degree of forward planning. We argue that, at least among monkeys, this is unlikely to be the case, and any long-term 'planning' is the product of an evolved 'rule of thumb' and not real-time cognitive processing. Finally, we highlight the fact that group life is inherently dynamic and that chance demographic effects can limit females' social options to a degree that suggests short-term contingent decision-making would be the more optimal strategy for females to adopt. We suggest that greater understanding of these three elements is required for a true understanding of the adaptive nature of female relationships.

10.1163/156853902760102672
/content/journals/10.1163/156853902760102672
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853902760102672
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853902760102672
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853902760102672
2002-02-01
2016-08-31

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation