Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Degradation of whitethroat vocalisations: implications for song flight and communication network activities

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Transmission of acoustic signals through the habitat modifies the signals and may thus influence their use in communication. We investigated the transmission of five different types of whitethroat (Sylvia communis) vocalisations, three types of song and two calls. Typical examples were broadcast and re-recorded in a whitethroat habitat with hedgerows and open meadow. We used a complete factorial design with speaker and microphone placed in different natural sender and receiver positions including high perches and song flights. Sound degradation was quantified in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, excess attenuation, tail-to-signal ratio and blur ratio. The results suggest that sound degradation generally increased with distance along a hedgerow, which means that birds here potentially may use degradation in assessing the distance to a vocalising individual. This is unlike the open meadow where the change in degradation with distance was negligible. Surprisingly, song flight relative to perched singing seems not to facilitate transmission of own vocalisations or perception of vocalisations from other individuals, and song flight vocalisations do not transmit differently from other types of vocalisations during song flights. One purpose of song flights might therefore be visual location by potential receivers and surveillance by the territory owner. Source level and degradation differed between the five types of vocalisations in accordance with their functions. Motif song and song flight songs used in attraction of females and/or deterrence of males could transmit through neighbouring territories, whereas the calls and the courtship diving song where a specific individual within or near the territory is addressed had relatively short communication ranges.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation