Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Extra-pair Paternity in the Dusky Warbler, Phylloscopus fuscatus: a Test of the 'Constrained Female Hypothesis'

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

The 'constrained-female hypothesis' (CFH) states that females risk losing their social partner's assistance in brood care when they engage in extra-pair copulations. Hence, it is predicted that individual differences in female extra-pair behaviour can be explained in terms of (1) the amount of male care that females risk to lose (2) the intrinsic ability of females to raise offspring without male help, and (3) food availability, facilitating uni-parental care. The dusky warbler, a species with a polygynous mating system and a high rate of extra-pair paternity (45% of the offspring) offers an excellent opportunity to test all these predictions. In accordance with prediction (1) I find that females in pairing situations in which they cannot expect to receive male assistance in brood care are more likely to have extra-pair young than females in situations where bi-parental care is the rule. Using age and bill morphology as predictors for a female's ability to raise nestlings alone, I find no direct support for prediction (2). Finally, variation in food availability (3) had no influence on extra-pair paternity. Overall, the CFH provides some explanation for why female promiscuity differs between situations of bi-parental and uni-parental care, but the large amount of remaining variation can neither be explained by food abundance nor by individual female characteristics.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation