Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Perception and judgement of whispered vocalisations

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Whispering is regarded as a close-contact vocalisation which, in structural terms, clearly differs from normal (phonated) speech. Here, we present the first experimental evidence for specific functional differences that additionally exist between these two forms of human vocal communication. Such evidence was collected by an inquiry into the perception and also the social judgement of whispered vocalisations. Subjects were young adults (mainly students; N=202) who were exposed to auditory stimuli which, for exclusion of verbal effects, were given in artificial vocal patterns only. To test for possible social effects, our stimuli (whispered phrases or, for control, phonated phrases) simulated exposures to three socially different situations: 'monologues', 'dialogues', and 'dialogues including laughter'. Evaluation of self-report data collected after each stimulation revealed that only the whispered stimuli received significant numbers of socially negative judgements or votes, that documented 'feelings of social segregation'. Such judgements were most frequent after exposures to 'dialogues including laughter', but less frequent after 'monologues'. Taken together our study suggests that whispering is not just a mere close-contact vocalisation, but a vocal expression with specific social side-effects. To explain these effects we presume that whispering signals primarily a strong affiliation of its users, and that such role may make other listeners feel to be excluded from a whispered interaction.

10.1163/1568539053627758
/content/journals/10.1163/1568539053627758
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539053627758
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1568539053627758
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1568539053627758
2005-01-01
2016-12-03

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation