Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The roles of male size and female eavesdropping in divorce in the monogamous convict cichlid (Archocentrus nigrofasciatus, Cichlidae)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

In this experiment we examined the roles of male size and female eavesdropping in divorce using the serially monogamous convict cichlid (Archocentrus nigrofasciatus) by testing predictions based upon the better option hypothesis of divorce. We tested the role of male size by exposing females to males that were 20-25% larger than their current mate or males that were similar size to their current mate. Female convict cichlids prefer larger males, therefore we predicted that the frequency of divorce would be higher when the alternate mate was larger than the current mate. We also examined the role of eavesdropping as a mechanism of female assessment of relative male quality. Females were either permitted to eavesdrop (males physically interacted) or females were unable to eavesdrop (males prevented from interacting). We predicted that female eavesdropping would result in greater frequency of divorce. We found that females chose divorce most often (50% ending in divorce) in the treatment where the alternate male was larger than the current mate and eavesdropping was permitted, whereas females never chose divorce in the treatment where the alternate male was similar in size to the current mate and the female was not permitted to eavesdrop. Although it had a mild effect, male size difference alone did not significantly increase divorce. When size difference was coupled with eavesdropping, however, females did significantly increase their divorce rates.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation