Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Friends and foes in foraging: intraspecific interactions act on foraging-cycle stages

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Intraspecific interactions may increase or decrease foraging rates of individual consumers, and such facilitation or interference interactions should affect individual foraging economies as well as predator-prey processes at the population level. To mechanistically predict individual foraging performance, we need to investigate the effects of positive and negative interactions on separate foraging-cycle stages. We illustrate the importance and viability of examining the effects of facilitation and interference on different foraging-cycle stages using three piscivore species as a model system. We studied individual foraging behaviour when alone or in the presence of conspecifics, and show that northern pike foraging in the presence of conspecifics decrease attack frequencies and consumption rates, although no explicit agonistic behaviours were recorded. Pikeperch increase consumption rates in conspecific groups, possibly through a prey-mediated increase in capture success, as pikeperch showed no direct behavioural interactions. The actively cooperating Eurasian perch increase capture success and consumption rates in groups. The results demonstrate the need to combine behavioural studies of positive and negative effects of intraspecific interactions on foraging-cycle stages with quantifications of overall consumption rates. Pure behavioural observations may result in misinterpretations of the effects of interactions on foraging, while studies on consumption rates only would lack the mechanistic base of the obtained results. We also suggest that effects of intraspecific interactions during the foraging cycle should be incorporated in mechanistic models of facilitation and interference to elucidate the link between individual behaviours and higher-order processes.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation