Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Boldness is influenced by social context in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Boldness refers to the extent to which animals balance risk against benefits when engaging in such behaviors as foraging, exploration or resource competition. Evidence suggests that individuals can behave strategically, acting boldly in situations when doing so is adaptive, whilst avoiding risk when the rewards are correspondingly lower. In this study we sought to determine the effects of social context upon the boldness of three spine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). We found that when individuals were tested alone, those that were more active were more likely to resume foraging sooner when subjected to a simulated predator attack in a separate test, and also consumed more prey in foraging competition trials. We found no effect of group size upon the relative ability of individuals to effectively compete for prey. Group size did affect other behaviours however: focal fish were more active and resumed foraging more rapidly when tested in groups that they did when tested alone. Finally, individual social information use was not correlated with behaviour in other contexts. Two competing hypotheses, the adaptation and the constraint hypotheses have been posited to explain the presence and prevalence of individual variation in boldness; our findings offer partial support for the former of these.

Affiliations: 1: University of Leicester, UK; 2: University of Leeds, UK


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation