Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Behavioural complexity and prey-handling ability in snakes: gauging the benefits of constriction

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Complexity is an important component of behaviour, but is rarely defined or quantitatively analyzed. We tested the hypothesis that complex behaviours are functionally superior to simpler behaviours. We generated complexity values for prey-handling behaviours used by snakes based on a count of behavioural acts, coordination among acts, and the amount of the snake's body used to subdue prey. We then compared prey-handling ability between species that differed in the complexity of behaviour used to subdue mice (Mus musculus). Corn and ratsnakes (Pantherophis guttata and P. obsoleta) always constricted mice while coachwhips (Masticophis flagellum) used simpler behaviours including jaw hold and body pinning. The constrictors required fewer strikes, less time to capture and subdue mice, and killed prey more quickly than did the coachwhips. Both jaw holding and constriction resulted in severe compression of the prey, but during constriction force is exerted at many points around the prey, while using the jaws limits force exertion to two opposing surfaces. Constriction divides the tasks of seizure and subjugation between the snake's head and body, thus reducing the number of tasks the jaws must perform. Our results support the idea that constriction is an adaptation for subduing vigorously struggling prey.

Affiliations: 1: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0334, USA

10.1163/156853907781492690
/content/journals/10.1163/156853907781492690
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853907781492690
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853907781492690
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853907781492690
2007-08-01
2016-12-07

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation