Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Quantifying the potential for sexual dimorphism using upper limits on Bateman gradients

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Sex differences in the correlation between number of offspring and number of mates likely drive much of the evolution of morphological and behavioral sexual differences. These correlations have traditionally been represented by slopes from regressions of number of offspring on number of mates (Bateman gradients). Typically the Bateman gradient is assumed to be large for males and zero for females. However, five of nine examples where male and female gradients have been measured show appreciable gradients for females. Difference in these 'actual' gradients reflect sex differences in the force driving sexual selection. In the lab it is simple to estimate the 'upper limits' on these Bateman gradients. Differences between male and female upper limits can be used to quantify the potential for sexual dimorphism. We demonstrate how to estimate these upper limits in a katydid (Conocephalus nigropleurum) where males provide females with a large food gift (nuptial gift) during mating. By mating males and females to either one or two virgin mates, we estimated the way maximum fecundity increased with additional mates for each sex, giving an estimate of the upper limit of sexual selection on each sex. We compared these estimates to predictions based on the relative value of the nuptial gift and female pre-mating fecundity. Contrary to expectation, the male upper limit did not exceed the female upper limit. Both the fact that a male's second nuptial gift was smaller than his first and that many matings failed to transfer appreciable numbers of sperm seem to have contributed to the unexpected result.

Affiliations: 1: Biology Department, University of Toronto at Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 1C6

10.1163/156853908782687205
/content/journals/10.1163/156853908782687205
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853908782687205
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853908782687205
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853908782687205
2008-01-01
2016-12-02

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation