Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Nest defence and egg rejection in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) as protection against conspecific brood parasitism

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Nest site availability is a factor associated with conspecific brood parasitism (CBP) in birds. The house sparrow (Passer domesticus) population on Dassen Island, South Africa, suffers from limited nesting space availability. We estimated the incidence of CBP in this population and determined experimentally whether sparrows retain the capacity to recognise and reject parasitic eggs. Other strategies that have evolved to thwart brood parasitism include nest guarding and nest defence. The presence of an intruding female near a nest may result in antagonistic behaviour as well as increasing the rejection of parasitic eggs (i.e., additive stimulus). This study tests if the presence of an intruding conspecific female generates an additive stimulus or whether nest guarding/defence and egg rejection are antagonistic responses, which has been studied principally in cases of interspecific brood parasitism (IBP). Despite space limitations, CBP was not detected in this population, and one third of foreign eggs were rejected. However, nest guarding/defence was not related to egg recognition and rejection. Egg rejection in this population does not appear to depend on the probability of nests being parasitised or on an inability to assume the costs associated with nest guarding/defence and with egg rejection.

Affiliations: 1: Departamento de Biología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Fuentenueva sn 18073, Spain; DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, Percy FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa; 2: DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, Percy FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation