Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The influence of predator and conspecific odor on sex differences in path choice in meadow voles

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price:
$30.00+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Behaviour

Many terrestrial mammals will choose the path that contains evidence of conspecifics with whom they would like to encounter, such as a potential mate, while avoiding a path that will lead them to encounter a threat, such as a same-sex conspecific or predator. We tested hypotheses about the space use of meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, in an arena containing a short arm and a long arm that both lead to the bedding of a sexually receptive opposite-sex conspecific. Subjects were tested under three conditions: in an empty arena (experiment 1); in an arena containing the scent mark of a known predator, the mink, Mustela vison (experiment 2); in an arena containing the scent mark of a same-sex conspecific (experiment 3). Male voles placed into an empty arena preferred to take the shorter of two paths to reach the bedding of a sexually receptive female; females did not show a preference in the length of the path to reach the bedding of a sexually receptive male. Male and females showed no preference for the short or the long path to reach the bedding of a potential mate, independent of the placement of the scent mark of a mink in the long or short path. Females and males showed no preference for the short or the long path to reach the bedding of a potential mate, independent of the placement of the scent mark of a same-sex conspecific in the long or short path. Males however, were less likely than females to enter a path if it contained the scent mark of a same-sex conspecific. The paths that male and female voles take to reach an opposite-sex conspecifics may be associated with sex differences their responses to risks of predation and same-sex competition.

1. Apfelbach R. , Blanchard C.D. , Blanchard R.J. , Hayes R.A. , McGregor I.S. ( 2005). "The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies". — Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. Vol 29: 1123- 1144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.05.005
2. Berteaux D. , Bety J. , Rengifo E. , Bergeron J.M. ( 1999). "Multiple paternity in meadow voles ( Microtus pennsylvanicus): investigating the role of the female". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 45: 283- 291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002650050563
3. Birkhead T. ( 2000). Promiscuity: an evolutionary history of sperm competition. — Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Boonstra R. , Xia X.H. , Pavone L. ( 1993). "Mating system of the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus ". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 4: 83- 89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/4.1.83
5. Borowski Z. ( 1998). "Influence of weasel ( Mustela nivalislinnaeus, 1766) odour on spatial behaviour of root voles ( Microtus oeconomuspallas, 1776)". — Can. J. Zool. Vol 76: 1799- 1804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z98-121
6. Bossert W.H. , Wilson E.O. ( 1963). "The analysis of olfactory communication among animals". — J. Theor. Biol. Vol 5: 443- 469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(63)90089-4
7. Brown R.E. , Macdonald D.W. ( 1985). Social odours in mammals. — Oxford University Press, Oxford.
8. Chapuis N.M. , Varlet C. ( 1987). "Short cut by dogs in natural surroundings". — Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Vol 39B: 49- 64.
9. Dewsbury D.A. ( 1990). "Individual attributes generate contrasting degrees of sociality in voles". — In: Social systems and population cycles in voles( Tamarin R.H. , Ostfeld R.S. , Pugh S.R. , Bujalska G. , eds). Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, p. 1- 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-6416-9_1
10. Dobly A. ( 2001). "Movement patterns of male common voles ( Microtus arvalis) in a network of Y junctions: role of distant visual cues and scent marks". — Can. J. Zool. Vol 79: 2228- 2238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjz-79-12-2228
11. Eilam D. , Dank M. , Maurer R. ( 2003). "Voles scale locomotion to the size of the open-field by adjusting the distance between stops: a possible link to path integration". — Behav. Brain Res. Vol 141: 73- 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00322-4
12. Ferkin M.H. ( 2007). "Effects of previous interactions and sex on over-marking in meadow voles". — Behaviour Vol 144: 1297- 1313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853907781890913
13. Ferkin M.H. , Combs A. , delBarco-Trillo J. , Pierce A.A. , Franklin S. ( 2008). "Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, have the capacity to recall the “what”, “where”, and “when” of a single past event". — Anim. Cogn. Vol 11: 147- 159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0101-8
14. Ferkin M.H. , Ferkin D.A. , Ferkin B.D. , Vlautin C.T. ( 2010). "Olfactory experience affects the response of meadow voles to the opposite-sex scent donor of mixed-sex over-marks". — Ethology Vol 116: 821- 831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01711.x
15. Ferkin M.H. , Johnston R.E. ( 1995). "Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, use multiple sources of scent for sex recognition". — Anim. Behav. Vol 49: 37- 44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)80151-0
16. Ferkin M.H. , Lee D.N. , Leonard S.T. ( 2004a). "The reproductive state of female voles affects their scent marking behavior and the responses of male conspecifics to such marks". — Ethology Vol 110: 257- 272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.00961.x
17. Ferkin M.H. , Li H.Z. , Leonard S.T. ( 2004b). "Meadow voles and prairie voles differ in the percentage of conspecific marks that they over-mark". — Acta Ethol. Vol 7: 1- 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10211-004-0089-x
18. Ferkin M.H. , Mech S.G. , Paz-y-Miño G. ( 2001). "Scent marking in meadow voles and prairie voles: a test of three hypotheses". — Behaviour Vol 138: 1319- 1336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853901317367618
19. Ferkin M.H. , Seamon J.O. ( 1987). "Odor preference and social-behavior in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus— seasonal differences". — Can. J. Zool. Vol 65: 2931- 2937. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z87-445
20. Galea L.A.M. , Ossenkopp K.P. , Kavaliers M. ( 1996). "Sexually dimorphic spatial learning in meadow voles Microtus pennsylvanicusand deer mice Peromyscus maniculatus ". — J. Exp. Biol. Vol 199: 195- 200.
21. Gaulin S.J. , Fitzgerald R.W. ( 1986). "Sex differences in spatial ability: an evolutionary hypothesis and test". — Am. Nat. Vol 127: 74- 88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/284468
22. Gaulin S.J. , Fitzgerald R.W. , Wartell M.S. ( 1990). "Sex differences in spatial ability and activity in two vole species ( Microtus ochrogasterand M. pennsylvanicus)". — J. Comp. Psychol. Vol 104: 83- 93.
23. Gorman M.L. ( 1984). "The response of prey to Stoat ( Mustela erminea) scent". — J. Zool. Lond. Vol 202: 419- 423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1984.tb05092.x
24. Gosling L.M. ( 1982). "A reassessment of the function of scent marking in territories". — Z. Tierpsychol Vol 60: 89- 118.
25. Guo R. , Liang N. , Tai F.D. , Wu R.Y. , Chang G. , He F.Q. , Yuan Q.W. ( 2011). "Differences in spatial learning and memory for male and female Mandarin voles ( Microtus mandarinus) and BALB/c mice". — Zool. Stud. Vol 50: 24- 30.
26. Hansen K. ( 1992). "Reproduction in european hare in a danish farmland". — Acta Theriol. Vol 37: 27- 34. http://dx.doi.org/10.4098/AT.arch.92-3
27. Hodges K.E. , Mech S. , Wolff J.O. ( 2002). "Sex and the single vole: effects of social grouping on prairie vole reproductive success". — Ethology Vol 108: 871- 884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00822.x
28. Jedrzejewski W. , Jedrzejewska B. ( 1990). "Effect of a predator’s visit on the spatial distribution of bank voles: experiments with weasels". — Can. J. Zool. Vol 68: 660- 666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z90-096
29. Jedrzejewski W. , Rychlik L. , Jedrzejewska B. ( 1993). "Responses of bank voles to odors of 7 species of predators — experimental data and their relevance to natural predator–vole relationships". — Oikos Vol 68: 251- 257. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3544837
30. Johnston R.E. ( 2003). "Chemical communication in rodent: from pheromones to individual recognition". — J. Mammal. Vol 84: 1141- 1162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/BLe-010
31. Keller B.L. ( 1985). "Reproductive patterns". — In: Biology of new world Microtus ( Tamarin R.H. , ed.). Am. Soc. Mammal. Sp. Publ., Vol. 8. Allen Press, Lawrence, KS, p. 725- 778.
32. Luque-Larena J.J. , Lopez P. , Gosalbez J. ( 2001). "Scent matching modualtes space use and agonistic behaviour between male snow voles, Chionomys nivalis ". — Anim. Behav. Vol 62: 1089- 1095. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1865
33. Madison D.M. ( 1980a). "An integrated view of the social biology of Microtus pennsylvanicus ". — Biologist Vol 62: 20- 33.
34. Madison D.M. ( 1980b). "Space use and social-structure in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus ". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 7: 65- 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00302520
35. Mappes T. , Koskela E. , Ylonen H. ( 1998). "Breeding suppression in voles under predation risk of small mustelids: laboratory or methodological artifact?"— Oikos Vol 82: 365- 369. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3546977
36. Meek L.R. , Lee T.M. ( 1993). "Female meadow voles have a preferred mating pattern predicted by photoperiod, which influences fertility". — Phys. Behav. Vol 54: 1201- 1210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(93)90349-K
37. Norrdahl K. , Korpimäki E. ( 1998). "Does mobility or sex of voles affect risk of predation by mammalian predators?"— Ecology Vol 79: 226- 232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0226:DMOSOV]2.0.CO;2
38. Orrock J.L. , Danielson B.J. ( 2009). "Temperature and cloud cover, but not predator urine, affect winter foraging of mice". — Ethology Vol 115: 641- 648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01654.x
39. Ossenkopp K.P. , van Anders S.M. , Engeland C.G. , Kavaliers M. ( 2005). "Influence of photoperiod and sex on locomotor behavior of meadow voles ( Microtus pennsylvanicus) in an automated light-dark ‘anxiety’ test". — Psychoneuroendocrinology Vol 30: 869- 879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.05.001
40. Palanza P. , Gioiosa L. , Parmigiani S. ( 2001). "Social stress in mice: gender differences and effects of estrous cycle and social dominance". — Physiol. Behav. Vol 73: 411- 420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00494-2
41. Perrot-Sinal T.S. , Heale V.R. , Ossenkopp K.P. , Kavaliers M. ( 1996a). "Sexually dimorphic aspects of spontaneous activity in meadow voles ( Microtus pennsylvanicus): effects of exposure to fox odor". — Behav. Neurosci. Vol 110: 1126- 1132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.110.5.1126
42. Perrot-Sinal T.S. , Kostenuik M.A. , Ossenkopp K.P. , Kavaliers M. ( 1996b). "Sex differences in performance in the Morris water maze and the effects of initial nonstationary hidden platform training". — Behav. Neurosci. Vol 110: 1309- 1320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.110.6.1309
43. Perrot-Sinal T.S. , Ossenkopp K.P. , Kavaliers M. ( 2000). "Influence of a natural stressor (predator odor) on locomotor activity in the meadow vole ( Microtus pennsylvanicus): modulation by sex, reproductive condition and gonadal hormones". — Psychoneuroendocrinology Vol 25: 259- 276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(99)00054-2
44. Roberts S.C. ( 2007). "Scent marking". — In: Rodent societies: an ecological and evolutionary perspective( Wolff J.O. , Sherman P.W. , eds). Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL, p.  255- 267.
45. Roberts S.C. , Gosling L.M. , Thornton E.A. , McClung J. ( 2001). "Scent-marking by male mice under the risk of predation". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 12: 698- 705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/12.6.698
46. Rose R.K. ( 1979). "Levels of wounding in the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus ". — J. Mammal. Vol 60: 37- 45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1379756
47. Rosell F. , Sanda J. ( 2006). "Potential risks of olfactory signaling: the effect of predators on scent marking by beavers". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 17: 897- 904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl022
48. Rühe F. , Hohmann U. ( 2004). "Seasonal locomotion and home-range characteristics of European hares ( Lepus europaeus) in an arable region in central Germany". — Eur. J. Wildlife Res. Vol 50: 101- 111.
49. Shier D.M. , Randall J.A. ( 2004). "Spacing as a predictor of social organization in kangaroo rats ( Dipodomys heermanni arenae)". — J. Mammal. Vol 85: 1002- 1008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/107
50. Singer R.A. , Abroms B.D. , Zentall Z.R. ( 2006). "Formation of simple cognitive map by rats". — Int. J. Comp. Psychol. Vol 19: 1- 10.
51. Spritzer M.D. , Meikle D.B. , Solomon N.G. ( 2005). "Female choice based on male spatial ability and aggressiveness among meadow voles". — Anim. Behav. Vol 69: 1121- 1130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.033
52. Trebatická L. , Sundell J. , Ylonen H. ( 2008). "Behaviour and resource use of two competing vole species under shared predation risk". — Oecologia Vol 157: 707- 715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1099-6
53. Trivers R.L. ( 1972). "Parental investment and sexual selection". — In: Sexual selection and the descent of man( Campbell B. , ed.). Heinemann, London.
54. Valone T.J. ( 2007). "From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 62: 1- 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0439-6
55. Valone T.J. , Templeton J.J. ( 2002). "Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon". — Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B Vol 357: 1549- 1557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1064
56. Vlautin C.T. , Hobbs N.J. , Ferkin M.H. ( 2010). "Male and female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, differ in their responses to heterospecific/conspecific over-marks". — Ethology Vol 116: 797- 805.
57. Wolff J.O. ( 1993). "Why are female small mammals territorial". — Oikos Vol 68: 364- 370. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3544853
58. Wolff J.O. ( 2004). "Scent marking by voles in response to predation risk: a field-laboratory validation". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 15: 286- 289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh009
59. Wolff J.O. , Davis-Born R. ( 1997). "Response of gray-tailed voles to odours of a mustelid predator: a field test". — Oikos Vol 79: 543- 548. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3546898
60. Ylonen H. , Ronkainen H. ( 1994). "Breeding suppression in the bank vole as antipredatory adaptation in a predictable environment". — Evol. Ecol. Vol 8: 658- 666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01237848
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853912x630272
2012-01-01
2015-07-05

Affiliations: 1: Department of Biological Sciences, Ellington Hall, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to email alerts
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Name:*
    Email:*
    Your details
    Name:*
    Email:*
    Department:*
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
     
     
     
    Other:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library

    Thank you

    Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation