Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Food-related tolerance in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) varies with knowledge of the partner’s previous food-consumption

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Behaviour

Capuchin monkeys, as well as several other primate species, show food-related tolerance in both captive and wild settings. Although researchers have revealed that past experience affects food-related tolerance, it is unclear if and how observing a partner’s previous food consumption affects tolerance. This question is important to determine the proximate mechanism of food-related tolerance, which may lead to food sharing, co-feeding, or tolerated taking. We investigated whether perception of another’s consumption of food affected the rate of tolerant food transfers among brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). First, in the test condition, subjects observed their partner either eating (Eat-In View) or not eating food (No Eat-In View) through a window. In a control condition, the subjects could not observe the same partner behind an opaque screen, while the partner either ate (Eat-Out of View) or did not eat (No Eat-Out of View). After this, the subjects were provided with food to examine how well they tolerated their partner’s access to it through the mesh. Tolerant food transfers were sharply reduced after the subjects had observed their partner eat, but not in the control condition or after they had observed the partner not eating. We consider two possible hypotheses for this behavior, one relates to the internal state of the subject after having seen their partner eat (i.e., increased competitiveness, aggression, or food motivation). The other hypothesis relates to how the subject understands the partner’s motivational state after having witnessed food consumption, perhaps by grasping the partner’s need.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyou-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan; 2: Living Links, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, 954 North Gatewood Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Axelrod R. ( 1984). The evolution of cooperation. — Basic Books, New York, NY.
2. Brown K. , Mack D.S. ( 1978). "Food sharing among captive Leonthopithecus rosalia ". — Folia Primatol. Vol 29: 268- 290.
3. Burkart J. , Fehr E. , Efferson C. , Van Schaik C. ( 2007). "Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: common marmosets provide food altruistically". — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol 104: 19762- 19766.
4. Cronin K.A. , Schroeder K.K.E. , Snowdon C.T. ( 2010). "Prosocial behaviour emerges independent of reciprocity in cottontop tamarins". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Vol 277: 3845- 3851.
5. de Waal F.B.M. ( 1989). Peacemaking among primates. — Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. de Waal F.B.M. ( 1997a). "The chimpanzee’s service economy: food for grooming". — Evol. Hum. Behav. Vol 18: 375- 386.
7. de Waal F.B.M. ( 1997b). "Food transfers through mesh in brown capuchins". — J. Comp. Psychol. Vol 111: 370- 378.
8. de Waal F.B.M. ( 2000). "Attitudinal reciprocity in food sharing among brown capuchin monkeys". — Anim. Behav. Vol 60: 253- 261.
9. de Waal F.B.M. ( 2009). The age of empathy. — Harmony Press, New York, NY.
10. de Waal F.B.M. , Berger M.L. ( 2000). "Payment for labour in monkeys". — Nature Vol 404: 563.
11. Dittus W.P.J. ( 1984). "Toque macaque food calls: semantic communication concerning food distribution in the environment". — Anim. Behav. Vol 34: 470- 477.
12. Gursky S. ( 2000). "Sociality in the spectral tarsier, Tarsius spectrum ". — Am. J. Primatol. Vol 51: 89- 101.<89::AID-AJP7>3.0.CO;2-7
13. Hamilton W.D. ( 1964). "The genetical evolution of social behavior". — J. Theor. Biol. Vol 7: 1- 16.
14. Kaplan H. , Hill K. , Lancaster J. , Hurtado A. ( 2000). "A theory of human life history evolution: diet, intelligence, and longevity". — Evol. Anthropol. Vol 9: 156- 185.<156::AID-EVAN5>3.0.CO;2-7
15. Kasper C. , Voelkl B. , Huber L. ( 2008). "Tolerated mouth-to-mouth food transfers in common marmosets". — Primates Vol 49: 153- 156.
16. Manly B.J.F. ( 1997). Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. — Chapman & Hall, London.
17. Perry S. , Rose L. ( 1994). "Begging and transfer of coati meat by white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capuchinus ". — Primates Vol 35: 409- 415.
18. Rheingold H. , Hay D. , West M. ( 1976). "Sharing in the second year of life". — Child Dev. Vol 47: 1148- 1158.
19. Wellman H.M. , Phillips A.T. , Rodriguez T. ( 2000). "Young children’s understanding of perception, desire, and emotion". — Child Dev. Vol 71: 895- 912.
20. Zahn-Waxler C. , Radke-Yarrow M. , Wagner E. , Chapman M. ( 1992). "Development of concern for others". — Dev. Psychol. Vol 28: 126- 136.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation