Gynogenesis is a peculiar mode of clonal reproduction in which eggs need to be pseudo-fertilized by sperm, but the male genes are not passed on to the offspring. One mating system in which gynogenesis is found involves a unisexual hybrid, the Amazon molly (Poecilia formosa), which typically uses males of its two parental species as sperm donors. Most gynogenetic lineages do not sexually parasitize males that were not involved in their hybrid origin and although some gynogens have the ability to utilize males from additional species, they rarely occur in sympatry with more than one sperm host. A few populations of the Amazon molly, however, do occur syntopically with more than one host species, raising the question of whether specific preferences have evolved in P. formosa and whether Amazon mollies can now act like Red Queens, driving the evolution of discrimination abilities in the host species. Near Ciudad Mante, Mexico, the critically endangered Tamesí molly (P. latipunctata) occurs in exclusive sympatry with Amazon mollies and one of P. formosa’s parental species, the Atlantic molly (P. mexicana). In this study we tested the initial and post-exposure preference of allopatric and sympatric P. formosa (with regards to P. latipunctata) between P. latipunctata and P. mexicana males. We predicted that P. formosa should favour P. mexicana because this is a parental species to P. formosa and the asexual shares half of the P. mexicana genome. Contrary to our predictions, we found no significant differences between preference scores in allopatric and sympatric populations of P. formosa in initial or post-exposure trials. Our findings may indicate that males of both species are perceived as equally effective in triggering embryogenesis by P. formosa. This study, along with limited previous work in the system, calls to attention the exploration of the adaptive ability of gynogenetic species relationships, and their implications for the long-term persistence of not only asexual lineages, but also the parasitized sexual species.
7. CholevaL. , ApostolouA. , JankoK. ( 2008). "Making it on their own: sperm-dependent hybrid fishes ( Cobitis) switch the sexual hosts and expand beyond the ranges of their original sperm donors". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Vol 363: 2911- 2919.
8. CostaG.C. , SchluppI. ( 2010). "Biogeography of the Amazon molly: ecological niche and range limits of an asexual hybrid species". — Global Ecol. Biogeogr. Vol 19: 442- 451.
21. KörnerK.E. , LütjensO. , ParzefallJ. , SchluppI. ( 1999). "The role of experience in mating preferences of the unisexual Amazon molly". — Behaviour Vol 136: 257- 268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853999501315
25. LivelyC.M. , CraddockC. , VrijenhoekR.C. ( 1990). "Red Queen hypothesis supported by parasitism in sexual and clonal fish". — Nature Vol 344: 864- 866. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/344864a0
26. MakowiczA.M. , PlathM. , SchluppI. ( 2010). "Using video playback to study the effect of an audience on male mating behavior in the sailfin molly ( Poecilia latipinna)". — Behav. Process. Vol 85: 36- 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.06.003
35. PetersonM.A. , HonchakB.M. , LockeS.E. , BeemanT.E. , MendozaJ. , GreenJ. , BuckinghamK.J. , WhiteM.A. , MonsenK.J. ( 2005). "Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrsysochus(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone". — Evolution Vol 59: 2639- 2655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00976.x
36. PfennigK.S. ( 1998). "The evolution of mate choice and the potential conflict between species and mate-quality recognition". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Vol 265: 1743- 1748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0497
41. RieschR. , SchluppI. , PlathM. ( 2008). "Female sperm limitation in natural populations of a sexual/unisexual mating complex (Poecilia latipinna, Poecilia formosa)". — Biol. Lett. Vol 4: 266- 269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0019
42. RobinsonD.M. , AspburyA.S. , GaborC.R. ( 2008). "Differential sperm expenditure by male sailfin mollies, Poecilia latipinna, in a unisexual–bisexual species complex and the influence of spermiation during mating". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 62: 705- 711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0495-y
43. RyanM.J. , DriesL.A. , BatraP. , HillisD.M. ( 1996). "Male mate preferences in a gynogenetic species complex of Amazon mollies". — Anim. Behav. Vol 52: 1225- 1236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0270
44. RyanM.J. , Keddy-HectorA.C. ( 1992). "Directional pattern of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases". — Am. Nat. Vol 13: 4- 35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/285303
46. SchartlM. , NandaI. , SchluppI. , WildeB. , EpplenJ.T. , SchmidM. , ParzefallJ. ( 1995b). "Incorporation of subgenomic amounts of DNA as compensation for mutational load in a gynogenetic fish". — Nature Vol 373: 68- 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/373068a0
47. SchartlM. , WildeB. , SchluppI. , ParzefallJ. ( 1995a). "Evolutionary origin of a parthenoform, the Amazon molly Poecilia formosa, on the basis of a molecular genealogy". — Evolution Vol 49: 827- 835. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2410406
63. WileyR.H. ( 1994). "Errors, exaggerations and deception in animal communication". — In: Behavioral mechanisms in evolutionary ecology( RealL.A. , ed.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p. 157- 189.