Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Mating preferences of Amazon mollies (Poecilia formosa) in multi-host populations

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

Buy this article

Price:
$30.00+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Behaviour

Gynogenesis is a peculiar mode of clonal reproduction in which eggs need to be pseudo-fertilized by sperm, but the male genes are not passed on to the offspring. One mating system in which gynogenesis is found involves a unisexual hybrid, the Amazon molly (Poecilia formosa), which typically uses males of its two parental species as sperm donors. Most gynogenetic lineages do not sexually parasitize males that were not involved in their hybrid origin and although some gynogens have the ability to utilize males from additional species, they rarely occur in sympatry with more than one sperm host. A few populations of the Amazon molly, however, do occur syntopically with more than one host species, raising the question of whether specific preferences have evolved in P. formosa and whether Amazon mollies can now act like Red Queens, driving the evolution of discrimination abilities in the host species. Near Ciudad Mante, Mexico, the critically endangered Tamesí molly (P. latipunctata) occurs in exclusive sympatry with Amazon mollies and one of P. formosa’s parental species, the Atlantic molly (P. mexicana). In this study we tested the initial and post-exposure preference of allopatric and sympatric P. formosa (with regards to P. latipunctata) between P. latipunctata and P. mexicana males. We predicted that P. formosa should favour P. mexicana because this is a parental species to P. formosa and the asexual shares half of the P. mexicana genome. Contrary to our predictions, we found no significant differences between preference scores in allopatric and sympatric populations of P. formosa in initial or post-exposure trials. Our findings may indicate that males of both species are perceived as equally effective in triggering embryogenesis by P. formosa. This study, along with limited previous work in the system, calls to attention the exploration of the adaptive ability of gynogenetic species relationships, and their implications for the long-term persistence of not only asexual lineages, but also the parasitized sexual species.

1. Alberici da Barbiano L. , Aspbury A.S. , Nice C.C. , Gabor C.R. ( 2011). "The impact of social context on male mate preference in a unisexual–bisexual mating complex". — J. Fish Biol. Vol 79: 194- 204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03009.x
2. Arnold M.C. ( 1997). Natural hybridization and evolution. — Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. Arnold M.C. , Hodges S.A. ( 1995). "Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents". — Trends Ecol. Evol. Vol 10: 67- 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88979-X
4. Avise J.C. ( 2008). Clonality: the genetics, ecology and evolution of sexual abstinence in vertebrate animals. — Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
5. Barton N.H. ( 2001). "The role of hybridization in evolution". — Mol. Ecol. Vol 10: 551- 568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01216.x
6. Beukeboom L.W. , Vrijenhoek R.C. ( 1998). "Evolutionary genetics and ecology of sperm-dependent parthenogenesis". — J. Evol. Biol. Vol 11: 755- 782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s000360050117
7. Choleva L. , Apostolou A. , Janko K. ( 2008). "Making it on their own: sperm-dependent hybrid fishes ( Cobitis) switch the sexual hosts and expand beyond the ranges of their original sperm donors". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Vol 363: 2911- 2919.
8. Costa G.C. , Schlupp I. ( 2010). "Biogeography of the Amazon molly: ecological niche and range limits of an asexual hybrid species". — Global Ecol. Biogeogr. Vol 19: 442- 451.
9. Coyne J.A. , Orr A. ( 2004). Speciation. — Sinaur Associates, Sunderland, MA.
10. Darnell R.M. ( 1962). "Fishes of the Rio Tamesí and related coastal lagoons in east central Mexico". — Publ. Inst. Marine Sci. Univ. Texas Vol 8: 299- 365.
11. Dries L.A. ( 2003). "Peering through the looking glass at a sexual parasite: are Amazon mollies Red Queens?"— Evolution Vol 57: 138- 1396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00346.x
12. Dukas R. ( 2008). "Learning decreases heterospecific courtship and mating fruit flies". — Biol. Lett. Vol 4: 645- 647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0437
13. Endler J.A. , Basolo A.L. ( 1998). "Sensory ecology, receiver biases, and sexual selection". — Trends Ecol. Evol. Vol 13: 415- 420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01471-2
14. Gabor C.R. , Ryan M.J. ( 2001). "Geographical variation in reproductive character displacement in mate choice by male sailfin mollies". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Vol 268: 1063- 1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1626
15. Goetz E. ( 2008). "Heterospecific mating and partial pre-zygotic reproductive isolation in the planktonic marine copepods Centropages typicusand Centropages hamatus ". — Limnol. Oceanogr. Vol 53: 433- 445. http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2008.53.2.0433
16. Goncalves D.M. , Oliveira R.F. , Körner K. , Poschadel J.R. , Schlupp I. ( 2000). "Using video playback to study communication in a marine fish, Salaria pavo ". — Anim. Behav. Vol 60: 351- 357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1459
17. Hettyey A. , Pearlman P.B. ( 2003). "Social environment and reproductive interference affect reproductive success in the frog Rana latastei ". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 14: 294- 300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/14.2.294
18. Hubbs C.L. , Hubbs L.C. ( 1932). "Apparent parthenogenesis in nature in a form of fish of hybrid origin". — Science Vol 76: 628- 630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.76.1983.628
19. Izzo A.S. , Gray D.A. ( 2011). "Heterospecific courtship and sequential mate choice in sister species of field crickets". — Anim. Behav. Vol 81: 259- 264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.10.015
20. Jones I.L. , Hunter F.M. ( 1998). "Heterospecific mating preferences for a feather ornament in least auklets". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 9: 187- 192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/9.2.187
21. Körner K.E. , Lütjens O. , Parzefall J. , Schlupp I. ( 1999). "The role of experience in mating preferences of the unisexual Amazon molly". — Behaviour Vol 136: 257- 268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853999501315
22. Kujtan L. , Dukas R. ( 2009). "Learning magnifies individual variation in heterospecific mating propensity". — Anim. Behav. Vol 78: 549- 555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.05.026
23. Lamb T. , Avise J.C. ( 1987). "Morphological variability in genetically defined categories of anuran hybrids". — Evolution Vol 41: 157- 165. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2408980
24. Lima N.R.W. , Kobak C.J. , Vrijenhoek R.C. ( 1996). "Evolution of sexual mimicry in sperm dependent all-female forms of Poeciliopsis(Pisces: Poeciliidae)". — J. Evol. Biol. Vol 9: 185- 203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1996.9020185.x
25. Lively C.M. , Craddock C. , Vrijenhoek R.C. ( 1990). "Red Queen hypothesis supported by parasitism in sexual and clonal fish". — Nature Vol 344: 864- 866. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/344864a0
26. Makowicz A.M. , Plath M. , Schlupp I. ( 2010). "Using video playback to study the effect of an audience on male mating behavior in the sailfin molly ( Poecilia latipinna)". — Behav. Process. Vol 85: 36- 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.06.003
27. Malmos K.B. , Sullivan B.K. , Lamb T. ( 2001). "Calling behaviors and directional hybridization between two toads ( Bufo microscaphus × B. woodhousii) in Arizona". — Evolution Vol 55: 626- 630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0626:CBADHB]2.0.CO;2
28. Marler C.M. , Ryan M.J. ( 1997). "Origin and maintenance of a female mating preference". — Evolution Vol 51: 1244- 1248. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2411053
29. McClintock W.J. , Uetz G.W. ( 1996). "Female choice and pre-existing bias: visual cues during courtship in two Schizocosawolf spiders (Aranea: Lycosidae)". — Anim. Behav. Vol 52: 167- 182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0162
30. McCoy E. , Syska N. , Plath M. , Schlupp I. , Riesch R. ( 2011). "Mustached males in a tropical Poeciliid fish: emerging female preference selects for a novel male trait". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 65: 1437- 1445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1154-x
31. Miller R.R. , Minckley W.L. , Norris S.M. ( 2005). Freshwater fishes of Mexico. — University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
32. Niemeitz A. , Kreutzfeldt R. , Schartl M. , Parzefall J. , Schlupp I. ( 2002). "Male mating behaviour of a molly, Poecilia latipunctata: a third host for the sperm-dependent Amazon molly, Poecilia formosa ". — Acta Ethol. Vol 5: 45- 49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10211-002-0065-2
33. Nuechterlein G.G. , Buitron D. ( 1997). "Interspecific mate choice by late-courting western grebes". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 9: 313- 321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/9.3.313
34. Nuismer S.L. , Thompson J.N. ( 2006). "Coevolutionary alternation in antagogonistic interactions". — Evolution Vol 60: 2207- 2217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01858.x
35. Peterson M.A. , Honchak B.M. , Locke S.E. , Beeman T.E. , Mendoza J. , Green J. , Buckingham K.J. , White M.A. , Monsen K.J. ( 2005). "Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrsysochus(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone". — Evolution Vol 59: 2639- 2655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00976.x
36. Pfennig K.S. ( 1998). "The evolution of mate choice and the potential conflict between species and mate-quality recognition". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Vol 265: 1743- 1748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0497
37. Pfennig K.S. ( 2007). "Facultative mate choice drives adaptive hybridization". — Science Vol 318: 965- 967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1146035
38. Poschadel J.R. , Plath M. , Schlupp I. ( 2009). "Divergent female mating preference in a clonal fish". — Acta Ethol. Vol 12: 55- 60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10211-009-0055-8
39. Ptacek M.B. ( 2000). "The role of mating preferences in shaping interspecific divergence in mating signals in vertebrates". — Behav. Process. Vol 51: 111- 134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00123-6
40. Reyer H.U. ( 2008). "Mating with the wrong species can be right". — Trends Ecol. Evol. Vol 23: 289- 292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.001
41. Riesch R. , Schlupp I. , Plath M. ( 2008). "Female sperm limitation in natural populations of a sexual/unisexual mating complex (Poecilia latipinna, Poecilia formosa)". — Biol. Lett. Vol 4: 266- 269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0019
42. Robinson D.M. , Aspbury A.S. , Gabor C.R. ( 2008). "Differential sperm expenditure by male sailfin mollies, Poecilia latipinna, in a unisexual–bisexual species complex and the influence of spermiation during mating". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 62: 705- 711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0495-y
43. Ryan M.J. , Dries L.A. , Batra P. , Hillis D.M. ( 1996). "Male mate preferences in a gynogenetic species complex of Amazon mollies". — Anim. Behav. Vol 52: 1225- 1236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0270
44. Ryan M.J. , Keddy-Hector A.C. ( 1992). "Directional pattern of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases". — Am. Nat. Vol 13: 4- 35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/285303
45. Ryan M.J. , Wagner W.E. Jr. ( 1987). "Asymmetries in mating preferences between species: female swordtails prefer heterospecific males". — Science Vol 236: 595- 597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.236.4801.595
46. Schartl M. , Nanda I. , Schlupp I. , Wilde B. , Epplen J.T. , Schmid M. , Parzefall J. ( 1995b). "Incorporation of subgenomic amounts of DNA as compensation for mutational load in a gynogenetic fish". — Nature Vol 373: 68- 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/373068a0
47. Schartl M. , Wilde B. , Schlupp I. , Parzefall J. ( 1995a). "Evolutionary origin of a parthenoform, the Amazon molly Poecilia formosa, on the basis of a molecular genealogy". — Evolution Vol 49: 827- 835. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2410406
48. Schlupp I. ( 2005). "The evolutionary ecology of gynogenesis". — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. Vol 36: 399- 417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152629
49. Schlupp I. ( 2009). "Behavior of fishes in the sexual/unisexual mating system of the Amazon molly ( Poecilia formosa)". — Adv. Stud. Behav. Vol 39: 153- 183.
50. Schlupp I. ( 2010). "Mate choice and the Amazon molly: how sexuality and unisexuality can coexist". — J. Hered. Vol 101(Suppl. I): S55- S61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esq015
51. Schlupp I. , Marler C. , Ryan M.J. ( 1994). "Benefit of male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females". — Science Vol 263: 373- 374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.8278809
52. Schlupp I. , Parzefall J. , Schartl M. ( 1991). "Male mate choice in mixed bisexual/unisexual breeding complexes of Poecilia(Teleostei: Poeciliidae)". — Ethology Vol 88: 215- 222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1991.tb00276.x
53. Schlupp I. , Parzefall J. , Schartl M. ( 2002). "Biogeography of the Amazon molly, Poecilia formosa ". — J. Biogeogr. Vol 29: 1- 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00651.x
54. Schlupp I. , Riesch R. ( 2011). "Evolution of unisexual vertebrates". — In: Ecology and evolution of poeciliid fishes( Schlupp I. , Evans J. , Pilastro A. , eds). Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL, p.  50- 58. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226222769.001.0001
55. Schlupp I. , Taebel-Hellwig A. , Tobler M. ( 2010). "Equal fecundity in sexual and asexual mollies (Poecilia)". — Environ. Biol. Fish. Vol 88: 201- 206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10641-010-9630-0
56. Schultz R.J. ( 1989). "Origins and relationships of unisexual poeciliids". — In: Ecology and evolution of livebearing fishes ( Poeciliidae)( Meffe G.K. , Snelson F.F. , eds). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, p.  69- 87.
57. Stöck M. , Lampert K.P. , Möller D. , Schlupp I. , Schartl M. ( 2010). "Monophyletic origin of multiple clonal lineages in an asexual fish ( Poecilia formosa)". — Mol. Ecol. Vol 19: 5204- 5215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04869.x
58. Tobler M. , Schlupp I. ( 2009). "Threatened fishes of the world: Poecilia latipunctataMeek, 1904 (Poeciliidae)". — Environ. Biol. Fish. Vol 85: 31- 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10641-009-9451-1
59. Trainor B.C. , Basalo A.L. ( 2000). "An evaluation of video playback using Xiphophorus helleri ". — Anim. Behav. Vol 59: 83- 89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1289
60. Umphrey G.J. ( 2006). "Sperm parasitism in ants: selection for interspecific mating and hybridization". — Ecology Vol 87: 148- 159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2148:SPIASF]2.0.CO;2
61. Van Valen L. ( 1973). "A new evolutionary law". — Evol. Theor. Vol 1: 1- 30.
62. Vrijenhoek R.C. ( 1994). "Unisexual fish — model systems for studying ecology and evolution". — Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. Vol 25: 71- 96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.000443
63. Wiley R.H. ( 1994). "Errors, exaggerations and deception in animal communication". — In:  Behavioral mechanisms in evolutionary ecology( Real L.A. , ed.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p.  157- 189.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853912x636302
2012-01-01
2015-06-30

Affiliations: 1: Department of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to email alerts
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Name:*
    Email:*
    Your details
    Name:*
    Email:*
    Department:*
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
     
     
     
    Other:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library

    Thank you

    Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation