Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Aversion to violation of expectations of food distribution: the role of social tolerance and relative dominance in seven primate species

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Studies on how animals behave when two partners receive different amounts of food have produced variable results, with individuals responding negatively to specific food distributions in some cases (e.g., when food is distributed unequally between partners), but not in others. In this study, we used a simple experimental approach to (i) assess the strictness of dominance relationships based on the degree of social tolerance and (ii) compare the behavioural responses of seven primate species (chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes; bonobos, Pan paniscus; gorillas, Gorilla gorilla; orangutans, Pongo pygmaeus; brown capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella; spider monkeys, Ateles geoffroyi; long-tailed macaques, Macaca fascicularis), when two partners received different amounts of food and no effort was required. We predicted that negative responses (i.e., refusal to participate in the task or avoidance of proximity to the food source) would be elicited by food distributions that violate the individual expectations based on tolerance levels and subject’s dominance rank relative to the partner. In the ‘tolerance’ task, we found that species with less strict dominance relationships were chimpanzees and bonobos, followed by orangutans, spider monkeys, gorillas, brown capuchin monkeys and long-tailed macaques. In the ‘food distribution’ task, capuchin monkeys and especially macaques showed their aversion by refusing to participate in most conditions, including the ones with equal food distribution. When dominants received more food than the partner, subjects of all species maintained a comparable amount of proximity to the food source, possibly reflecting the general acceptance of such a food distribution across species. When dominants received less than or as much as their partners, dominant capuchin monkeys maintained less proximity than other species, possibly because having different expectations of food distributions (i.e., more/all food to the dominant). Our study highlights the importance of the species’ degree of social tolerance and the relative dominance rank between partners in the study of violation of expectations of different food distributions.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Comparative and Developmental Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; 2: Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, James Parsons Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK

10.1163/156853912X637833
/content/journals/10.1163/156853912x637833
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853912x637833
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Amici F. , Aureli F. , Call J. ( 2008). "Fission–fusion dynamics, behavioural flexibility and inhibitory control in primates". — Curr. Biol. Vol 18: 1415- 1419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.020
2. Amici F. , Aureli F. , Call J. ( 2010). "Monkeys and apes: are their cognitive skills really so different"? — Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Vol 143: 188- 197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21305
3. Amici F. , Aureli F. , Visalberghi E. , Call J. ( 2009a). "Spider monkeys ( Ateles geoffroyi) and capuchin monkeys ( Cebus apella) follow gaze around barriers: evidence for perspective-taking"? — J. Comp. Psychol. Vol 123: 368- 374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017079
4. Amici F. , Call J. , Aureli F. ( 2009b). "Variation in withholding of information in three monkey species". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Vol 276: 3311- 3318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0759
5. Aureli F. , Schaffner C.M. ( 2008). "Social interactions, social relationships and the social system of spider monkeys". — In: Spider monkeys: behavior, ecology and evolution of the genus Ateles ( Campbell C.J. , ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p.  236- 265.
6. Braeuer J. , Call J. , Tomasello M. ( 2006). "Are apes really inequity averse"? — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Vol 273: 3123- 3128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3693
7. Braeuer J. , Call J. , Tomasello M. ( 2009). "Are apes inequity averse? New data on the token-exchange paradigm". — Am. J. Primatol. Vol 7: 175- 181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20639
8. Brosnan S.F. ( 2006). "Nonhuman species’ reactions to inequity and their implications for fairness". — J. Soc. Just. Vol 19: 153- 185.
9. Brosnan S.F. , de Waal F.B. ( 2003). "Monkeys reject unequal pay". — Nature Vol 425: 297- 299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01963
10. Brosnan S.F. , de Waal F.B. ( 2004). "Fair refusal by capuchin monkeys". — Nature Vol 428: 140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/428140b
11. Brosnan S.F. , de Waal F.B. ( 2006). "Partial support from a nonreplication: comment on Roma, Silberberg, Ruggiero, and Suomi (2006)". — J. Comp. Psychol. Vol 120: 74- 75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.120.1.74
12. Brosnan S.F. , Flemming T. , Talbot C.F. , Mayo L. , Stoinski T. ( 2011). "Orangutans ( Pongo pygmaeus) do not form expectations based on their partner’s outcomes". — Folia Primatol. Vol 82: 56- 70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000328142
13. Brosnan S.F. , Freeman C. , de Waal F.B.M. ( 2006). "Capuchin monkey’s ( Cebus apella) reactions to inequity in an unrestricted barpull situation". — Am. J. Primatol. Vol 68: 713- 724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20261
14. Brosnan S.F. , Talbot C. , Ahlgren M. , Lambeth S.P. , Schapiro S.J. ( 2010). "Mechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes ". — Anim. Behav. Vol 79: 1229- 1237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.019
15. Burnham K.P. , Anderson D.R. ( 2004). "Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection". — Soc. Methods Res. Vol 33: 261- 304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644
16. Byrne R.W. ( 1999). "Object manipulation and skill organization in the complex food preparation of mountain gorillas". — In: The mentalities of gorillas and orangutans: comparative perspectives( Parker S.T. , Mitchell R.W. , Miles H.L. , eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p.  147- 159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542305.007
17. Chalmeau R. , Gallo A. ( 1996). "What chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes) learn in a cooperative task". — Primates Vol 37: 39- 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02382918
18. Chalmeau R. , Lardeux K. , Brandibas P. , Gallo A. ( 1997). "Cooperative problem solving by orangutans ( Pongo pygmaeus)". — Int. J. Primatol. Vol 18: 23- 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026337006136
19. de Waal F.B.M. ( 1989). "Behavioral contrasts between bonobo and chimpanzee". — In: Understanding chimpanzees( Marquardt P. , ed.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, p.  154- 175.
20. de Waal F.B.M. ( 1996). Good natured: the origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. — Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. de Waal F.B.M. ( 1997). "Food transfers through mesh in brown capuchins". — J. Comp. Psychol. Vol 111: 370- 378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.111.4.370
22. de Waal F.B.M. ( 2006). "Joint ventures require joint payoffs: fairness among primates". — Soc. Res. Vol 73: 349- 364.
23. Dindo M. , de Waal F.B.M. ( 2007). "Partner effects on food consumption in brown capuchin monkeys". — Am. J. Primatol. Vol 69: 1- 9.
24. Dubreuil D. , Gentile M.S. , Visalberghi E. ( 2006). "Are capuchin monkeys ( Cebus apella) inequity averse"? — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Vol 273: 1223- 1228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3433
25. Dufour V. , Pelé M. , Neumann M. , Thierry B. , Call J. ( 2009). "Calculated reciprocity after all: computation behind token transfers in orangutans". — Biol. Lett. Vol 5: 172- 175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0644
26. Fehr E. , Schmidt K.M. ( 1999). "A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation". — Q. J. Econ. Vol 114: 817- 868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151
27. Feigenson L. , Dehaene S. , Spelke E. ( 2004). "Core systems of number". — Trends Cogn. Sci. Vol 8: 307- 314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002
28. Hare B. , Melis A. , Woods V. , Hastings S. , Wrangham R. ( 2007). "Tolerance allows bonobos to outperform chimpanzees in a cooperative task". — Curr. Biol. Vol 17: 619- 623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.040
29. Hauser M. , Tsao F. , Garcia P. , Spelke E. ( 2003). "Evolutionary foundations of number: spontaneous representation of numerical magnitudes by cotton-top tamarins". — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Vol 270: 1441- 1446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2414
30. Jaeggi A.V. , Stevens J.M.G. , van Schaik C.P. ( 2010). "Tolerant food sharing and reciprocity is precluded by despotism among bonobos but not chimpanzees". — Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Vol 143: 41- 51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21288
31. Janson C.H. ( 1985). "Aggressive competition and individual food consumption in wild brown capuchin monkeys ( Cebus apella)". — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Vol 18: 125- 138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00299041
32. Janson C.H. ( 1996). "Toward an experimental socioecology of primates. Examples from Argentine brown capuchin monkeys ( Cebus apella nigritus)". — In: Adaptive radiations of neotropical primates( Norconk M.A. , Rosenberger A.L. , Garber P.A. , eds). Plenum Press, New York, NY, p.  309- 325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8770-9_18
33. Kappeler P.M. , Pereira M.E. ( 2003). Primate life histories and socioecology. — University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
34. Massen J.J.M. , van den Berg L.M. , Spruijt B.M. , Sterck E.H.M. ( 2012). "Inequity aversion in relation to effort and relationship quality in long-tailed macaques ( Macaca fascicularis)". — Am. J. Primatol. Vol 74: 145- 156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajp.21014
35. Melis A.P. , Hare B. , Tomasello M. ( 2006). "Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators". — Science Vol 311: 1297- 1300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1123007
36. Neiworth J.J. , Johnson E.T. , Whillock K. , Greenberg J. , Brown V. ( 2009). "Is a sense of inequity an ancestral primate trait? Testing social inequity in cotton top tamarins ( Saguinus oedipus)". — J. Comp. Psychol. Vol 123: 10- 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012662
37. Roma P.G. , Silberberg A. , Ruggiero A.M. , Suomi S.J. ( 2006). "Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion, and the frustration effect". — J. Comp. Psychol. Vol 120: 67- 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.120.1.67
38. Schmitt V. , Fischer J. ( 2011). "Representational format determines numerical competence in monkeys". — Nature Commun. Vol 2: 257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1262
39. Silberberg A. , Crescimbene L. , Addessi E. , Anderson J.R. , Visalberghi E. ( 2009). "Does inequity aversion depend on a frustration effect? A test with capuchin monkeys ( Cebus apella)". — Anim. Cogn. Vol 12: 505- 509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0211-6
40. Singleton I. , Knott C.D. , Morrogh-Bernard H.C. , Wich S.A. , van Schaik C.P. ( 2009). "Ranging behavior of orangutan females and social organization". — In: Orangutans: geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation( Wich S.A. , Utami Atmoko S.S. , Mitra Setia T. , van Schaik C.P. , eds). Oxford University Press, New York, NY, p.  205- 213.
41. Smuts B.B. , Cheney D.L. , Seyfarth R.M. , Wrangham R.W. , Struhsaker T.T. ( 1987). Primate societies. — University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
42. Stoinski T.S. , Hoff M.P. , Maple T.L. ( 2003). "Proximity patterns of female western lowland gorillas ( Gorilla gorilla gorilla) during the six months after parturition". — Am. J. Primatol. Vol 61: 61- 72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajp.10110
43. Tabachnick B.G. , Fidell L.S. ( 2007). Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn.Pearson Education, Boston, MA.
44. Takimoto A. , Fujita K. ( 2011). "I acknowledge your help: capuchin monkeys’ sensitivity to others’ labor". — Anim. Cogn. Vol 14: 715- 725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0406-5
45. Talbot C. , Williams L.E. , Brosnan S.F. ( 2011). "Squirrel monkeys’ response to inequitable outcomes indicates evolutionary convergence within the primates". — Biol. Lett. Vol 7: 680- 682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0211
46. Thierry B. ( 2007). "Unity in diversity: lessons from macaque societies". — Evol. Anthropol. Vol 16: 224- 238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evan.20147
47. Tiddi B. , Aureli F. , di Sorrentino E.P. , Janson C.H. , Schino G. ( 2011). "Grooming for tolerance? Two mechanisms of exchange in wild tufted capuchin monkeys". — Behav. Ecol. Vol 22: 663- 669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr028
48. van Schaik C.P. ( 2003). "Local traditions in orangutans and chimpanzees: social learning and social tolerance". — In: The biology of traditions: models and evidence( Fragaszy D.M. , Perry S. , eds). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, p.  297- 328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584022.012
49. van Wolkenten M.V. , Brosnan S.F. , de Waal F.B.M. ( 2007). "Inequity responses of monkeys modified by effort". — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol 104: 18854- 18859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707182104
50. Warneken F. , Hare B. , Melis A.P. , Hanus D. , Tomasello M. ( 2007). "Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children". — PLoS Biol. Vol 5: e184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050184
51. Warneken F. , Tomasello M. ( 2006). "Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees". — Science Vol 311: 1301- 1303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1121448
52. Werdenich D. , Huber L. ( 2002). "Social factors determine cooperation in marmosets". — Anim. Behav. Vol 64: 771- 781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.9001
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853912x637833
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853912x637833
2012-01-01
2016-12-10

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation