Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Prey Recognition in the Praying Mantis 1)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

The external factors which release and control prey capture in the praying mantis have been studied in Parastagmatoptera unipunctata and Hierodulae gen. In tests with various kinds of live prey and dummies the strike has been found to be most readily released if I.) the prey is within reach of the forelegs; 2.) the prey moves as a whole while exhibiting rapid, jerky movements of appendages. Size, shape and direction of the prey are less important, while color and odor have no strike releasing value. Continuous presentation of a strike-releaser results in more or less rapid response-waning, depending upon its releasing value. Suboptimal dummies cause complete refractoriness within minutes, while optimal prey continues to elicit strikes after several hours. However, even under optimal internal and external conditions the frequency of strike-discharge declines rapidly at first and then more slowly. By comparing mantids normally raised on live flies with isolated, hand-fed animals and with mantids which were exclusively fed on prey of low stimulus-value, it has been shown that 1.) the strike-releasing qualities of the prey are not learned through experience; 2.) the stimulus-response relations of the subsequent acts of catching and putting to the mouth can be quantitatively modified during the individual life.

Affiliations: 1: (Department of Biology, Tufts University-, Medford; Massachusetts, U.S.A.

10.1163/156853959X00063
/content/journals/10.1163/156853959x00063
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853959x00063
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853959x00063
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853959x00063
1959-01-01
2016-12-05

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation