Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Counting in Jackdaws

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

A preliminary investigation into 'counting' in Jackdaws using the Discrimination Box as illustrated. Shadrach was trained to the buzzer as a significant cue and Meshach to light flashes. With Shadrach results, significant at the 01 level (X2), were obtained after 300 trials, and with Meshach after 400 trials. Transfer to the other modality gave results, significant at the 01 level, after 100 trials. Transfer from light to buzzer alarmed Meshach and trial sequences became so lengthy that he was discarded. A randomised schedule of 2: 3 buzzes was given to Shadrach, B door being + 3 and - 2, A door being - 3 and +2. Learning was rapid, results being significant at the 01 level after 100 trials. A randomised schedule of 3: 4 buzzes was then given keeping B door + 3 and - 4. Results were significant at the .01 level after 100 trials suggesting that the response was not being made on the basis of 'moreness'. A 2:3:4 discrimination was then given keeping B door still + 3 and -2 and - 4. Experimental breakdown occurred and a 'side response' developed. After a three month rest away from the experimental situation he was unable to relearn the original 2:3 discrimination resorting to a 'side response' which varied from 100-trial sequence to sequence. The results obtained appear to indicate that discrimination between 2 : 3 or 3:4 was based on the discrete properties of the stimulus and not on 'moreness'. Also, that the transfer between modalities is possible where the skill transferred involves discrimination of numbers of stimuli.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology, Birkbeck College, London


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation