Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Comparisons Between Chicks That Fail To Imprint and Ones That Imprint Strongly

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Day old chicks that imprinted strongly (followed strongly and showed subsequent, substantial preference for the imprinting stimuli) were compared to ones that did not imprint. Comparisons were by weight, sex, and activity level. Results included : 1. No relation between neonatal weight and imprintability. 2. No relation between sex and imprintability. Though males were somewhat more active (or more probably, reactive) than females were, the greater reactivity related to still stronger following only in strongly imprinted males. 3. A positive relationship between reactivity and following. Specifically, chicks that followed strongly were more reactive than chicks that did not follow.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, U.S.A.

10.1163/156853967X00145
/content/journals/10.1163/156853967x00145
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853967x00145
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853967x00145
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853967x00145
1967-01-01
2016-12-10

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation