Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Singing Behaviour of Blue-Winged and Golden-Winged Warblers and Their Hybrids

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

1. Songs of 12 Blue-winged Warblers (Vermivora pinus), 7 Golden-winged Warblers (V. chrysoptera) and 5 obvious hybrids were studied in the field near Ithaca, New York, U.S.A. 2. The primary song of the two species is distinctive. Hybrids sing one or the other of the parents' songs. Two birds had "reversed" songs, one a Blue-winged Warbler with Golden-wing song, the other a Golden-winged Warbler with Blue-winged song. The secondary song, sung early in the season only by disturbed birds or later in the season by undisturbed birds as well, is similar in the two species and hybrids. 3. Golden-winged Warblers and hybrids with Golden-wing song vary the number of notes in their songs according to the context. Fewer notes are given after mating (especially near the female), and following encounters with other males. In most instances, the more intense the preceding encounter, the shorter the song. Blue-winged Warblers differ in that they do not change the song directly at mating. A hybrid with a Blue-winged song and a Golden-wing with Blue-wing song resembled Golden-wings more in that they shortened song immediately after mating. The only bird that lengthened his song after mating was a Blue-wing with Golden-wing song. Both species and hybrids gave secondary songs following encounters with males. Secondary songs were usually given following more intense encounters than shorter versions of the primary song. Secondary songs under undisturbed conditions later in the season were more common in the Blue-wing. Flight songs which consist of secondary songs were observed only in Blue-wings and certain hybrids. Variants of this secondary song occurred only in the Blue-wing. 4. The two species differed in the amount of song after mating. Blue-wings had an abrupt decrease at the time of mating, Golden-wings a more gradual one. However, Golden-wings ceased singing earlier than Blue-wings and were usually silent during the parental phase. Hybrids resembled more the parent species whose song they sang. 5. The sequential patterning of songs within bouts was studied in birds with Golden-wing songs. Songs beginning bouts had fewer notes than those ending bouts. Under undisturbed conditions, songs with the same number of notes tended to follow each other and there were only two types of songs per bout. However, when disturbed, there was more often skipping and more than two songs per bout. 7. A hybrid (character) index was constructed of plumage patterns of the two species and hybrids. Song form and singing behavior were also scored. Form of song was not directly associated with plumage but singing behavior was. Therefore, these motivational factors are probably directly genetically controlled. 8. Evidence is presented that singing is a relatively independent tendency. Birds with Golden-wing songs give the primary song when the singing tendency is strong. When the general singing tendency is weaker, either absolutely or relatively because of the influence of other tendencies, particularly escape, the song is shortened. Secondary song seems to occur when the escape tendency is even stronger and/or the singing tendency weaker. 9. The functions of the primary and secondary songs are different, secondary songs playing no role in mate selection. The Golden-wing has developed more complexity in the primary song, the Blue-wing in the secondary. 10. Those vocalizations termed "song" probably have diverse functions as well as motivations in different passerines as a consequence of different evolutionary histories.

Affiliations: 1: formerly Laboratory of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, U.S.A; 2: (Department of Zoology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland

10.1163/156853967X00226
/content/journals/10.1163/156853967x00226
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853967x00226
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853967x00226
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853967x00226
1967-01-01
2017-08-18

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation