Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Coital Behavior in Dogs Iii. Effects of Early Isolation On Mating in Males

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Three groups of male beagles were reared from weaning to sexual maturity under special circumstances and their responses to estrous females were compared in a series of mating tests. Five dogs were reared under conditions of semi-isolation (SI). They lived in individual cages and had very little physical contact with other animals throughout the experiment. The 5 males constituting the control group also inhabited individual cages but for 15 min. each day they were set free in the colony room where they could interact with other uncaged dogs. A final group of 5 males was reared together with 5 females in a I-acre field. None of the subjects had contact with estrous bitches except during the mating tests. The copulatory performance of the control and the group-reared males was essentially the same, but that of the semi-isolates was deficient in one particular. SI males mounted estrous females as readily and as frequently as members of the other 2 groups, but the orientation of mounting was abnormal. Ninety-seven per cent of the mounts by control and group-reared males were oriented to the female's rear, whereas 39 per cent of the mounts by SI dogs were directed to the head, side, or flank of the receptive bitch. One consequence of this difference was that SI males achieved intromission in only 24 per cent of their tests, as compared with 58 per cent and 54 per cent for the control and group-reared animals.

Affiliations: 1: University of California, Berkeley, Calif. U.S.A.

10.1163/156853967X00334
/content/journals/10.1163/156853967x00334
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853967x00334
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853967x00334
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853967x00334
1967-01-01
2016-12-04

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation