Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Wavelength Preferences and Brightness Cues in the Water Finding Behaviour of Sea Turtles

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Experiments with 1116 hatchling green sea turtles, Chelonia mydas, involving 1927 trials, revealed that 1. In preference tests between a blue and a red stimulus, or between a yellow and a red stimulus, the attractiveness of the red stimulus could be boosted by increasing its intensity relative to the blue or yellow alternative. Although there was a preference for a blue stimulus over a red containing equal energy, this preference could be reversed if the relative intensity of the red was made sufficiently high. 2. Pure blue or green lights did not attract turtles significantly more than blue/red or green/red mixtures containing greater amounts of energy. 3. When large visual obstructions were introduced into the natural beachscape hatchlings headed toward the centre of an open horizon. 4. Unilaterally blindfolded turtles circled toward the uncovered eye. In the present tests there was some directional progress along the shore. 5. Weather conditions could affect orientation; the influence of a freak cloud over the ocean horizon was described as an example. 6. Hatchlings had individual directional biases. Mildly aberrant animals that headed off at a slight angle to the surf during seafinding tended to show the same behaviour when retested. 7. The reaction to photic stimuli became weak in animals taken from environments above about 24° C. 8. The method of releasing animals in the turtle arena test did not greatly alter eseaward orientation (Appendix). The following interpretations are put on these results: The preference for a blue stimulus over a red depends partly on brightness. There could be a subsidiary colour preference for blues, since the red stimuli had to contain relatively more energy to make them behaviourally as potent as the blue or yellow than would have been expected on the basis of the ERG sensitivity data, and since in the mixing experiments there was no tendency to select the brighter stimuli. But if there is a blue preference the part it plays in seafinding can only be secondary compared to brightness. Simultaneous comparison of brightness cues from a wide field of view enables the turtle to head for the centre of an open horizon. The underlying mechanism involves a balancing of brightness inputs in both eyes. The hatchling orientates to maintain such a balance. Individual directional tendencies may be explained in terms of initial biases system; for instance, mild unilateral pathology leading to reduced sensitivity in one eye might be implicated. A number of other miscellaneous points and observations about water finding behaviour can be understood in terms of a balancing of brightness inputs, but there are a few cases in the literature of breakdown in seafinding that remain unexplained. The water finding of freshwater turtles probably requires other or auxiliary mechanisms. For the green sea turtle on the Tortuguero beaches the most open horizon is nearly always seaward and is nearly always brighter than the landward direction. These turtles have a brightness preference and a tropotactic reaction to light. Therefore the principal cue in their seafinding is the bright illumination from an open horizon.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; 2: Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa., U.S.A

10.1163/156853968X00216
/content/journals/10.1163/156853968x00216
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853968x00216
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853968x00216
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853968x00216
1968-01-01
2016-12-02

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation