Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Individual Voice Production in Gannets

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

Landing calls of known individual male gannets were recorded over a period of a month. The calls were subsequently analyzed using a sonograph with an amplitude display attachment. Changes in the amplitude envelope in time appeared to be the only measure which readily exhibited consistent individual features. Each sequence of landing calls which was given on a single occasion was reduced by averaging to a single 'profile' or pattern of numbers. Three such profiles were obtained for each of 10 males. One of each male's profiles was set into a computer as one of 10 reference sources; the remaining profiles were tested against them. The matching procedure consisted in cross-correlating the sample profiles with the reference patterns and identifying the sample with the reference which gave the highest correlation. The identification was usually correct. The same procedure was repeated using progressively less information from the sounds to see how much of a sound was necessary for correct identification. It was found that sometimes as little as one quarter of the sound profile was sufficient. The limitations of the technique and the implications of the results are discussed.

Affiliations: 1: Sub-Department of Animal Behaviour, Madingley, Cambridge, England


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation