Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Role of Vision in the Orientation of the Echolocating Bat, Myotis Lucifugus

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Behaviour

DAVIS & BARBOUR (1965) found that echolocating bats may utilize visual cues even when reliable, supra-threshold echolocation cues are available. The present experiment obtained a similar effect using a simultaneous discrimination paradigm. Ten Myotis lucifugus were rewarded with food for responding to a large-white triangle, but were not rewarded when they responded to a small-black triangle. The bats were given 20 trials each day until they achieved a criterion of 17 correct responses out of 20. They were then randomly divided into two groups and given 20 trials per day: 10 test trials to transfer test stimuli and 10 test trials to the original training stimuli. The transfer test stimuli for the "size" test group were a large-white triangle versus a small-white triangle, and for the "brightness" test group a large-white triangle versus a large-black triangle. On the transfer tests the bats in the "size" group did not run to either of the transfer test stimuli above chance, indicating a failure to discriminate size either visually or by echolocation. The bats in the "brightness" group, however, ran more frequently to the large-white stimulus than to the large-black stimulus, indicating a visual discrimination. During testing both groups indicated retention of the original training task. A blindfolded control group indicated that a size discrimination based on echolocation cues was possible. These results were interpreted as indicating that echolocation is not always the preferred modality for echolocating bats, and that under some conditions the bats may prefer to use visual cues.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, U.S.A.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Behaviour — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation