Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Effects of Prenatal and Postnatal Auditory Stimulation On Early Vocalization and Approach Behavior in the Japanese Quail (Coturnix Coturnix Japonica)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Behaviour

The purpose of this experiment was to examine the effects of prenatal and postnatal auditory stimulation and the effects of age, experience, and social context during testing on the early behavior of chicks of the quail Coturnix coturnix japonica. One group of chicks (group PRO) was exposed to a 2000-Hertz tone twice per second for 4 hours before hatching and 4 hours after hatching. A second group (group PR) was exposed to the auditory stimulus for 4 hours before hatching. A third group (C, controls) was not exposed to the stimulus. For testing, each group was divided into 7 categories defined by age at testing, prior test experience, and whether the subject was tested singly or with another chick. Each chick was tested for 8 minutes with the auditory stimulus on and 4 minutes with it off. Peep (distress) vocalizations and approaches to the auditory stimulus as opposed to a tactile stimulus in a choice test were recorded. Chicks in all groups peeped less when the auditory stimulus was turned on, and peeped less when tested in pairs. Age at testing and prior test experience had no effect. Group PRO peeped more than either group PR or group C, regardless of whether the sound was on or off. Few chicks approached either stimulus in the choice test, but all that did preferred the auditory stimulus. Group PRO approached more frequently than group C but less frequently than group PR. Thus both prenatal and postnatal auditory stimulation modified later vocalization and approach behavior. Several possible interpretations of these findings as well as their implications for imprinting research methodology are discussed.

Affiliations: 1: (Psychology Department, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

10.1163/156853975X00164
/content/journals/10.1163/156853975x00164
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853975x00164
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853975x00164
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853975x00164
1974-01-01
2016-08-31

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation