Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Flight-Associated Discharge Pattern in a Weakly Electric Fish, Gnathonemus Petersii (Mormyridae, Teleostei)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Behaviour

A GnathonEmus petersii which is put into the tank of a Mormyrus rume, or of an electrically silenced G. petersii, displays a discharge rate which is only one fourth (8 Hz) the rate exhibited by an attacking, territory-defending animal. In both instances, the variability of intervals is great. In contrast to the bimodal histogram of an attacking animal, the histogram of an inferior, fleeing fish displays only one mode. This mode is identical to the burst activity-mode of the resting histogram, and different from the swimming histogram mode. So the histogram displayed by an attacked and persecuted animal is significantly different from the histograms exhibited by i) isolated resting, ii) isolated swimming, and iii) attacking fish. During an attack-elicited escape reaction, G. petersii increases its discharge rate up to 55 Hz in a step-like fashion, while regularising the length of successive intervals ("fleeing signal"). The step-like discharge rate increase is also shown by the receiver of an Approach who does not move. This suggests that the step-like discharge rate increase, associated with the escape reaction, is not an incidental response to changed motor activity. The "fleeing signal" presumably is i) an incidental response to a vegetative reaction, or ii) it may have the significance of a signal communicating a socially relevant message (e.g. threat).

Affiliations: 1: Laboratoire de Physiologie Nerveuse, Département dc Neurophysiologie Sensorielle, C.N.R.S. Gif-sur-Yvette, Fance, Universität Konstanz, Fachbereich Biologic, Konstanz, German Federal Republic

10.1163/156853976X00488
/content/journals/10.1163/156853976x00488
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853976x00488
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853976x00488
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/156853976x00488
1976-01-01
2016-09-26

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation